Revised March 22nd, 2001. Your comments, corrections and suggestions would be appreciated.
Rural
poverty gradually appeared early in the 19th century as the
industrial revolution got under way. The Walloon parts of southern
Belgium (Liege, Namur and some of Hainaut) tended to fare better
because they were quick to invest in the new industrial technologies
in coal mining operations and other heavy industries. However the
rural economies of Flanders remained dependent on labour-intensive
agriculture and on poorly paying cottage
industries, such as spinning
and
weaving.
Before the industrial revolution spinning and weaving in the homes
contributed an important part to rural peoples' incomes,
supplementing their earnings from farm work. But poverty increased as
the work of these cottage industries moved into
factories
in towns and the effects of this were further aggravated by the
increasing difficulty of providing adequate amounts of farming l and
because the
population
doubled
between 1846
and 1947 and
grew from 4.3 to 8.5 million
people.![]()
In
contrast to what was happening in neighboring countries, Belgium was
still characterized by small
unproductive farms that continued to use primitive methods which were
not always able to ensure an adequate food supply. An ongoing
fragmentation of the farms meant that the farm
size
became
smaller and smaller and
the variety of the crops larger. Many members of
large farming families could no longer find employment on the farm,
thus causing a considerable
labor
surplus. As
a result, between 1846 and 1947 the agricultural population dropped
by 62% from 1,075,031 to 412,026. Some of these moved into towns to
work in new
factories.
Others moved
to
work
seasonally
in France and Holland, usually at the time that the sugar beet crop
needed cultivation. And may thousands
emigrated
permanently
to the
United States and Canada.![]()
Some
of the consequences of these changes are reflected in the map below
that shows that in mid-1800s a high percentage of households in East
and West Flanders and in Walloon Brabant required financial help from
their municipality. By this standard, conditions were not as bad in
the district of Leuven in which Tremelo is situated. In comparison to
conditions in Flanders, poverty was less severe in the northeastern
provinces, Antwerp and Limburg because population density was lower
and because the soil was sandy and less fertile than in Flanders. The
people there had long been accustomed to surviving by small-scale,
self-sufficient, subsistence farming.![]()
However, in West and East Flanders
and in parts of Brabant many of the unemployed sought financial
assistance as shown below.
In
addition to the gradual loss of income from the move of cottage-based
spinning and weaving to
factories
in the towns, effects of the
industrial
revolution
were
aggravated by a gradual decrease in the size of family farms. This
was the result of two major factors: The population increase caused a
progressive decrease in the size of parcels
of land inherited by farmers' sons. From
about 1830 to 1870 the number of holdings under 0.5 hectares (under
1.5 acres) rose, reflecting the progressive subdivision of the land
into less-and-less viable farming lots. Thereafter there was a
gradual consolidation of the land by the land owners into more
profitable larger farming units.
In
order to survive, additional income had to be found and the rural
population tried to earn extra money by working in their homes.
However, spinning in cottages disappeared as it moved to large
factories such as that of Lieven Bauwens in Gent. This was further
aggravated by the subsequent loss of weaving of fine woolen goods.
Then in 1842 linen weaving in Flanders became mechanized and this
last of the major cottage crafts gradually
ceased.
2Very,
very
few
farmers owned
land
they
cultivate. They were mostly tenants of large land owners who
demanded
high
rents
for land,
based on their expected crops' value. This rent, averaging
perhaps 30% of that value, was determined by agreement long
before the crops were harvested and the rent remained fixed
regardless of yield or prices at market time. On top of that they had
to pay in peacetime tax of 5%, and this rose to 10 to 20% in wartime.
A further 10% of their income went to support the priest and maintain
the church, amounting to a total of around 50% of their
farming
income,
leaving barely enough to live on. Many could not survive on this and
hired themselves out as farmer laborers ('boerenknechte' or
'dagloners'), doing the sowing or harvesting on farms in summer and
working as weavers
in their
cottages during the fall and winter. Most of the
weaving of linen cloth in cottages was done by the men. They
typically lived on the
edge of
poverty. People made do with clothing.
This gradual
degradation of the poor is reflected in the
changing
occupations
of
bridegrooms on marriage records
and of the fathers on birth certificates. Beginning early in the
century the occupation 'landbouwer' (farmer) on these documents
changed to 'dagloner'. Such families saved as much as possible money
earned as laborers for essential purchases. Even the cheapest pair of
shoes cost 5 days' labour. They grew much of their own food,
especially potatoes, in a small garden and pastured a cow on grass
along public roads for milk. A pig fed on food scraps was slaughtered
in the autumn and its meat smoked or salted down for use in the
winter. Their monetary income was supplemented by weaving or spinning
during winter season. For our ancestors, life was always lived on the
edge. Economics and the prevailing social structures of their time
combined to keep the tenant farmers and their helpers
('boerenknechten') firmly in their 'place' in the world.
If you were
poor, the realities of life were cruel and you had to be totally
dedicated to the mere act of survival. In the
cottages women did lace work and handiwork at home by candlelight or
kerosene lamp. Here the middlemen merchants who supplied the raw
materials and 'bought' the products benefited more than the cottage
workers. Such lace makers and seamstresses often went blind in the
process. Often the only furnishings in the
cottages
such the one to the right might be a table, bed, trunk or
a
couple
chairs and some kitchen utensils.
![]()
The gradual overall deterioration of life was
aggravated by the population explosion that coincided with
industrialization and many country folk were uprooted and forced to
seek employment in factories in the towns. Note in the photo the the
farmer's wife ('landbouwster') peeling potatoes, the mainstay of life
among the poor.
By the 19th century potato had become the
staple food of poor people as it helped to fill empty stomachs
better
than bread and the poor had become <--potato
eaters.
But in 1845 the harvest of potatoes and grain was reduced to 30% of
normal. The importance of the potato had grown: In 1713 the potato
was not used, in 1740 it began to be traded on the market, by 1775
the potato was the main food of the poor.
In the months of July and August
1845, aided by damp weather, an extremely virulent form of the fungus
Phytophtora Infectans, resulted in a very unpredictable harvest,
first in Belgium (around Kortrijk ?) and in the Netherlands, followed
by the rest of Europe. Estimated losses due to this
potato
plague amounted
from 1/4 to 1/2 of the crop. In the provinces of West and East
Flanders this figure reached more than 90%. The disease reared its
head again in July 1946: "The fields were black in two to three weeks
time and
the smell blew over the roads"3.The
disaster became complete when the barley crop
also failed.
But famines never occur in isolation. Poorly fed
people living in closely packed little houses under unhygienic
conditions encouraged infestation with lice which often carried the
typhus organism. These conditions resulted in frequent epidemics of
typhus.
Cholera
due to poor
sanitation combined with poor nutrition resulting from
semi-starvation diets, particularly after a crop failure, and endemic
typhus produce periodic disasters. It became a routine duty of the
local 'veldwachter' (policeman) to visit frequently each cottage in
the community. Often he might find everyone dead4.
However, with
time incomes slowly increased:
![]()
Why was there so much poverty?
Poverty has also been describe in detail, including the life of the "Wild Beggars" (bosgeuzen) in the town of Korsele. That information was originally mounted by Dirk De Ruyver at: http://www.geocities.com:80/Athens/Cyprus/1521/korsele.html and has been copied here with his permission.
1
"The
Structures of Everyday Life - Civilization and Capitalism, 15th -
18th Centuries", Volume I, by Fernand Braudel. English translation
from the French "Les Structures du Quotidien: Le Possible et
L'Impossible" 1979.)
For a nostalgic look at life about 50-100 years ago in southern
Holland, see the beautiful picture book: "In My Grandfather's House"
by Rien Poortvliet, published by Henry N. Abrams, New York.
Henrietta Diehl and Arthur Hgen helped edit this page.
2
Personal
communication from Jozef Smits.
3
Mijn land in de Kering" by Karel van Isacker, 1980
4
Described
in Dutch as "The population died quietly from the "Flemish sickness''
starvation and exhaustion" at
<http://www.vum.be/dsifvlm2.html>.