Hiram
Parks Bell: The Old Field School
Chapter 3 from Men
and Things is a continuation in the series on Col. Hiram Parks Bell. The volume was published in 1907 shortly
before the death of its author. The
following is located on pp. 14-26:
“The old field school, like some other institutions of this country,
has, in its peculiar way, served its day and generation, and by common consent
has been relegated to memory and history.
In these days of public school fads, higher education pretentions,
college and university base and football games, and punch bowl banquets,
reference is seldom made to an institution which, though lowly in origin and
humble in claim, has made possible all these institutions as well as our
advanced state of civilization. When it
is referred to it is usually with the sneer of derision or the smile of
amusement. It seems that such a spirit
of ingratitude is capable of repudiating the love of a mother, or reproaching
the misfortune of poverty. It met a
condition of society at a time and under circumstances which could not have
been met without it. It kindled a light
that made the opening years of the twentieth century all radiant with the glow
of intelligence. The ‘old field school’
possessed three distinctive sides---the ludicrous, the sentimental, and the
useful. Its houses, furniture and
comforts, as well as the extent of its curriculum and the qualifications of its
teachers, compared with those of the present time, appear ludicrous in the
extreme.
“The schoolhouse was usually located in the corner of an old field
cleared by the Indians, or in the woods, constructed of small round oak or
large, split pine logs, notched down at the corners and covered with
clapboards. The orthodox dimensions
were 24 x 16 feet. The larger part of
one end was devoted to what is known as a ‘stick and dirt chimney.’ Economy in labor and money was promoted by
dispensing with sleepers and floor, and substituting the ground therefor. The furniture consisted of a small, rough
pine table and a superannuated chair in the rear of it. This was the throne of the intellectual
sovereign. The seats for the pupils
were made of oak or chestnut logs about six inches in diameter, split open in
the center and pegs driven into auger holes from the round side of the
half-log. These pegs were of a length
that would prevent the feet of the urchins occupying the benches from reaching
the dirt floor by a distance of from six to eight inches. To occupy such a seat for a long, hot summer
day was a penance that ought to atone for a multitude of sins. The remaining article of furniture was the
writing bench. This consisted of a
rough plank nailed to the top of a frame, as nearly on a level as practicable,
twelve inches wide and ten feet long, and a plank of similar dimensions joined
to each of its edges, slightly inclining downwards.
“The aesthetic will perceive that this equipment, in the line of
convenience and comfort, was neither expensive nor elaborate. The curriculum was not extensive but it had the
merit of being in harmony with its surroundings, and confined, within the
constitutional limitation, to ‘the elements of an English education only.’ It embraced spelling, reading, writing and
arithmetic. The standard textbooks
were: The American Spelling Book,
the American Preceptor, and Dilworth’s or Fowler’s Arithmetic. A little later, as this class of educational
institution advanced, the Columbian Orator and Weem’s Life of Washington were added.
“The teachers, in the main, were men of advanced age, too lazy to work
and too poor to live without it. Having
appeared after the age of Raphael, Titian, Angelo, and Reynolds, and passed
away before the discovery of Daguerre, the world has lost the pleasure of
looking upon their pictures and must rely only upon such faint and imperfect
pen-pictures as memory alone can supply.
“I have in mind with some degree of distinctness, the image of four of
them who are strikingly typical of the class.
For fear of marring the pleasure of some filial descendant in tracing
his heraldry, for the discovery of his ancestral escutcheon, I refrain from
stating names. Indeed, the given or
Christian name of the first one to whom I refer is forgotten. I only remember that his students, by common
consent, substituted for it, whatever it was, the name ‘Nipper,’ so that he was
known only as Nipper A____s. I do know,
however, that he was a tall, ungainly, bald-headed, sour-tempered old man, with
no magnetism and but little intelligence.
He was not deficient in physical force, as two certain boys who engaged
in an innocent game of ‘hard-knuckles’ during study hours when he was supposed
to be asleep, after having visited, at the noon recess, a neighboring
still-house, discovered to their mortification and discomfort.
“The next one, W_____, whose only possession was a homely wife and a bad
‘small boy,’ was an Irishman of exuberant cheerfulness. No conditions seemed to discourage or
dishearten him. He secured his support,
principally, from his neighbors by borrowing such articles of food as were
necessary to prevent actual starvation, under the pretext that ‘to his
surprise, he had ascertained that the articles desired had just been exhausted
at home,’ and with the munificence of a prince bestowing an ‘order’ or
conferring a proconsulship upon a grateful subject, he promised to return it
with manner that simply defies description, except to say that it was done in a
way of Irish shrewdness that made the lender feel that he was the
beneficiary. This feeling was the only
benefit he ever received for the loan.
His theory of teaching seemed to consist, judging from his practice, in
the belief that light could be communicated to the mind by the application of
force to the body.
“H_____, unlike W_____, was a man of some means. He had a wife, a very large family of
children, five or six dogs and two rifleguns, the stocks of which were well
worn by long use. Mr. K_____ was a man
of large frame, dark complexion, of slow and deliberate speech; though of
robust health he seemed to be averse to motion, and the act of breathing
appeared to be irksome to him. If the
‘law of the Lord’ was not his delight the law of inertia was. His uncharitable neighbors entertained the
suspicion that he was afflicted with an attack of remediless laziness. Of the truth of this imputation, posterity
must judge. I only state the facts in
this case.
“F_____, the remaining member of this quartet of famous pedagogues, was
a man of decidedly marked, if not unique personality. His stature was low, his head large and of peculiar form, his
lower limbs short and bent with a regularity that fitly represented the segment
of a circle, the convex side being outward; his feet inclined to the club
variety; his walk was sort of hobbling and shuffling movement. The conception of a cross between a
chimpanzee and a dwarf would present the nearest an ideal picture, of which his
figure was susceptible. In bestowing
her gifts, Nature had been parsimonious with him; some---and among them
beauty---had been entirely withheld. An
officiating clergyman said at a vagrant’s funeral, that ‘Whatever else might be
said of the deceased, all would admit that he was a good whistler.’ So I can
say of this dead pedagogue (and it is about all that could be said), he wrote a
beautiful hand.
“These great men of the olden time were differentiated mainly , if not
solely, in their personality. They were
all old men. They were about on an
equality in scholarly attainments, perhaps I should say, in the absence of
scholastic attainments. They all taught
at the same place, used the same books, practiced like methods and quenched
their thirst at the common ‘still house.’
“As the branches taught were few, the methods employed were simple. The lessons were studied vocally, not
silently, and by far the largest portion of the study consisted in the hubbub
of mingled voices in every variety of key.
The full measure of vocal power was developed in preparing the “heart
lesson” preceding the evening adjournment.
With favorable atmospheric conditions the hum of this noise could be
distinctly heard at the distance of a
mile, and the peculiar shrieks of one boy’s voice (Duncan Campbell’s) could be
easily distinguished at that distance.
The useful art of writing was taught by commencing with a so-called
‘line of straight marks’ across the top of a leaf of coarse, unruled
paper. This, of course, was made by the
teacher and called the ‘copy.’ The
beginner, equipped with a goose-quilled pen and the juices pressed from oak
balls (well known among the scholars as ink balls) for ink, commenced the
process of copying the marks. The
second lesson was the mark, as in the first, curved at the bottom and traced
upward. This mark, in the figurative
language of the teacher, was called ‘pot hooks.’ The third copy was a line of ‘pot hooks’ with the second line
curved at the top and brought down to evenness with the lower curve; then
followed copies of capital letters of the alphabet, etc. It was a singular fact that the students
almost invariably in making these curves, slightly twisted and protruded the
tongue, and kept the tongue and eyes in a movement precisely corresponding to
the motion of the pen. I never did
understand, and do not now know, which was the dominant motion in this
operation---these members or the pen. I
had the privilege of securing early instruction from each of the worthies here
mentioned, in an institution which I have endeavored to describe. Whatever mistakes in instruction or
discipline they made I forget and forgive.
For whatever of good they did me, I give them the thanks of a heart
which I trust is incapable of ingratitude.
The
Sentimental Side of the Old Field School
‘A land without sentiment is a land without liberty,’ The short
resolution adopted by the Pilgrim fathers in the cabin of the Mayflower was the
prophecy of our magnificent structure of democratic constitutional
government. They symbolized the
religious faith of the United States as they stood on Plymouth Rock.
‘And shook the depths of the forest gloom with hymns of lofty cheer.’
“The old field school was our present generation in embryo. It was the beginning of what now is. Pioneer settlers were always distinguished
for their energy, industry, fearlessness and faith. This school was theirs.
Indeed, it was the pioneer educational institution of the North American
wilderness.
“On a Monday morning, late in July or early in August, coming from all
directions in a circle within three miles around the schoolhouse, from 40 to 50
children of both sexes, ranging in age from five to 20 years, might be seen to
meet at the schoolhouse. They were
simply and cheaply clad in such apparel as their good mothers could
manufacture. They were all barefoot,
except for the few grown girls. They
were all bronzed by the mingled force of hard labor and hot sunshine. The commissariat consisted of bacon, or
steak, sandwiched between slices of cornbread or biscuit, neatly wrapped in a
clean napkin and placed in a small tin bucket, or basket, and a black quart
bottle---which had seen other service---filled with buttermilk and closed with
a corn cob stopper. The
dessert---peaches and apples---were carried in the boys’ pockets. There was no difficulty in arranging
classes. All that was necessary was to
point out and assign as lessons, the alphabet, the lesson in spelling and the
multiplication table. A few lessons
being recited, the noon recess reached and lunch over, they assembled on the
playground, and speedily renewed old and formed new acquaintances. They cared little for the ceremonious
etiquette of courts, or the military discipline of camps. These children on the playground presented a
scene on which idle angels would delight to look for.
‘
They also serve who only stand and wait.’
“The games they played, if lowly and rustic, were healthful and
harmless. Their section of the country,
at least, had not been favored with the entertainment of the cock pit, the bull
fight, nor football. Nor had a powerful
daily press then delighted the public with columns of detailed description of
the bloody ‘rounds’ of Jeffries and Fitzsimmons. To preserve the facts of history, a list of them is given; they
were: Base, tag, cat, marbles,
bull-pen, town-ball, shinny, roly-hole and mumble peg. Both sexes joined in the first two named,
therefore base and tag had precedence in popularity. I always thought, for the reason, that the execution involved the
thrill of touch. These children had a
common experience in labor and poverty; had learned self-denial and
self-sacrifice; had waded in the branch and been charmed by the ripple of its
tiny waterfalls; had gathered autumnal fruitage in the tangled wildwood; had
breathed alike the fragrance of the rose and honeysuckle; had listened in
ecstasy to the chorus of the birds and gazed in wonder upon the stars that deck
the diadem of night. They had communed
with Nature and reveled in its charms until their life had become an unwritten
idyl. They had likewise realized in
their short, young lives all the emotions of hope and fear, of success and
defeat, trial and triumph, and gratification and disappointment.
“As they stood on the playground about to advance a step in the social
and intellectual world, each felt the consciousness of a force within that was
not understood, and that could neither be defined nor described, still it
throbbed in the brain, pulsated in heartbeats and gurgled through the
veins. It was present in their
ambitions, aspirations, admirations, envyings, rivalries, likes and
dislikes. What was this force? Was it the struggling of the mind for higher
attainments in knowledge, the panting of the restless spirit for the solace of
peace, or the thirst of the soul, clamoring for one full draught of immortality? Nobody can tell. No one knows. Whatever it
was, it was the power dying
‘Ion caught from Clemanthe’s eye’ that assured him a reunion of love,
Beyond the sunset’s radiant glow.’
“If they never heard the name of the poet, nor read the couplet, they
all felt the sentiment that
‘Kind words were more
than coronets,
And simple faith, than Norman blood.’
It was very soon discovered that in playing the game of base some boys
were very easily caught by certain particular girls. It was further observed that the same boys and girls, in going
home in the evening, would linger at the parting of the ways and play, or
pretend to play ‘tag.’ They parted with
the compact that, whichever one reached the place first on the succeeding
morning, in returning to school, would make a cross mark or drop the twig of a
green bush in a particular place in the road.
This sign always accelerated the movements of the party of the second
part. I never heard of any complaint of
violating the stipulations of this treaty.
It may be, after all, that these trivial, simple little things shed
light on the solution of this great problem that has baffled the learning and
exploded the theories of psychologists.
It was a little thing to dip seven times in Jordan but it healed a
leper.
“In long after-years and from faraway places, many a heart has sent
memory back to the old playground, and silently sighed for
‘The touch of a vanished hand, and the sparkle of an eye forever
closed.’
The
Useful Side of the Old Field School
“It must be remembered that the school under consideration was the
educational initiative, the first grade or primary species of the genus old
field school. This grade did not, and
necessarily, could not exist long. It
was subject to the great law of gradation, progress and development, which
seems to have dominated the process of creation, as well as the disclosures of
revelation. As the good people improved
their conditions, increased their means and enlarged their views, they built better
houses, used superior books and employed more capable teachers. Occasionally, in a more wealthy
neighborhood, an academy would spring up, and as new counties were formed the
law provided for the establishment of an academy at the county seat. In the meantime the University was
struggling up to the guerdon of triumph; later the great churches built
colleges for both sexes; finally public sentiment crystallized into
constitutional provision for the public school system.
“The first grade of the old field school, as described in these pages,
is the granite bedrock upon which this superb superstructure rests. It was the small seed from which this
luxuriant harvest within the period of a century was gathered. The children of this school, belonging to
the same grade of society, identified in common environments, and the
sympathies which result from early association (at least many of them), married
and organized homes in the quiet country, in which peace, gentleness, affection
and contentment exemplified the only remnant of Eden, unblasted by the
fall. They became the parents and
grandparents of a race of men and women that subdued the wilderness, beautified
it with gardens, orchards, farms, towns and cities, and crowned it with temples
of worship and learning, and hospitals and asylums. A race of chivalrous patriots, who in 1812, dispersed the boasted
navy of England, sent back to her, from New Orleans, the pickled corpse of
Packenham; scaled the rocky heights of Cherubusco, Chepultepec, Milino del Rey;
floated the American flag from the dome of the capitol of the Aztecs, and
spangled the ‘milky way’ of national glory with a gorgeous jewelry of stars.
“The people provided the old field school for themselves. It was the best they could do, and they
deserve the grateful thanks of all the coming ages for what they did.
“There were two other potent factors cooperating with the old field
school in laying the foundation for these achievements. They were the Decalogue and the Sermon on
the Mount. Side by side with the school
appeared the irrepressible Methodist circuit rider, with his much-used and
well-worn Bible, hymn book, and ‘Discipline,’ preaching every day in the week,
at the little log church or schoolhouse, and at night frequently at some house
of a brother in the neighborhood. At
the same time the Baptists appeared, preaching on Saturday and Sunday. The preaching of that day dealt with the
doctrines of depravity, repentance, faith, regeneration, and obedience, as
taught in the Bible, with occasional reference by the Baptist brethren to some
of the dogmas of the ironclad theology of Geneva, such as election and
reprobation, final perseverance, mode of baptism, etc. These combined forces formed the character
of a good people and directed the course and shaped the destiny of a great
nation. The power of many of these men
finds fit expression in Wirt’s description of the blind preacher: ‘They spoke as if their lips had been
touched with a live coal from off the Altar.’
They accepted the Mosaic cosmogony.
They taught that ‘the Son of Man came to seek and to save that which was
lost,’ and that He brought ‘life and immortality to light.’ They indulged in no speculations on the
‘glacial’ and tertiary periods, nor did they waste any time in searching for
‘protoplasm,’ nor tracing their paternity, through the process of ‘evolution,’
to a monkey progenitor.
“Schools, academies, colleges and universities cannot educate. They can only supply the means to aid and
enable people to educate themselves.
Education, in its last analysis, is a personal work, facilitated by the
aid of helpful agencies, or retarded, of course, by their absence. To become thoroughly educated,
comparatively, required a life long, unremitting, systematic process of
observation, reading, and thinking; and this can only be done by the student
himself. The great and learned Newton
said that he ‘had only picked up a few shells on the shore, while the great
ocean of knowledge lay, unsailed, beyond him.’
The old field school did its work, and did it well. Like the ‘Mother of the Gracchi,’ she can
present George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay, and
Abraham Lincoln as her jewels and proudly challenge Harvard or Yale, Oxford or
Cambridge, Leipsic or Heidleberg, or all of them combined, to duplicate this
quintet of American immortals.