CARLOW HISTORY
 
Carlow County - Ireland Genealogical Projects (IGP TM)

General Election

December 1834-January 1835

From a book 'Ireland 1800-1850' by Desmond J. Keenan, B.S.Sc.; Ph.D. c2001

http://www.deskeenan.com/index.htm


Chapter 13

General Election December 1834-January 1835

Peel's First Ministry (1834-1835)

January 1835

The bitter in-fighting continued in Carlow between those Catholics who wished to vote for the local resident Tory landlord and the priests who wished to support O'Connell. The new bishop of the diocese Dr Edward Nolan, who had succeeded after the death of Doyle, allowed some of his political priests, in what he perceived as an emergency, to canvass Catholic voters, to explain to the 'real nature of the question', namely, the need to protect the people from (alleged) tithe massacres, to rescue education from proselytizers, to prevent the return of the 'old ascendancy faction', and to remove the 'enormous abuses of a Church establishment'. It can be seen that the bishop had not bothered to read the Tamworth Manifesto or to consult Colonel Bruen, the local Tory landlord and MP. The bishop was not stating a general policy on political priests and considered his permission to the priests as being limited to what he regarded as a time of national crisis. But he set a precedent that was to endure until the setting up of the Irish Free State. Every election thereafter could be depicted as critical either for Church or national interests or both.

At this time too the leader of the Catholic Tories in Carlow, a man named Thomas Finn, whose brother was married to O'Connell's sister, wrote a public letter in which he accused him of gross immorality. Rebutting a charge of ‘profligacy in his political opinions’ made against him by O’Connell in the Anti-Tory Association he replied, ‘This is pretty well coming from the proprietor of a seraglio, composed of every order of the Cyprian profession, from the lofty runagate of Kerry down to the lowly under-wench of the Earl of Meath’s Liberty’ (Carlow Sentinel 14 Feb 1835. No evidence was adduced, and most newspapers quoted the letter with no comment. This letter appears to be the origin of the rumour, cherished in both Orange and Republican circles, that O'Connell had a bastard child in every parish in Ireland.) In Carlow and elsewhere there were allegations that the Tory landlords were threatening to evict any tenant who failed to support them. Col. Bruen and others rebutted the allegations, but the Repealers tried to bankrupt Protestant shopkeepers in the boroughs through 'exclusive dealing,' i.e. dealing only with Catholic shopkeepers. (This policy had been considered earlier by the Catholic Association but was rejected on the grounds that it could hurt Catholics more than Protestants. For example, Protestants could refuse to hire any Catholic servants. The policy was to be enforced as the 'boycott' fifty years later, leading inevitably to the refusal to hire Catholic servants.)

The Trades' Political Union, now (January 1835) legal again, met to organize the return of O'Connell and Ruthven. Their adoption as candidates was proposed by Lawless. The meeting was a public one in Townsend Street chapel, so presumably anyone could speak. O'Connell had already formed the Anti-Tory Association.

O'Connell and Ruthven were returned in Dublin, Wyse in Waterford, Sheil in Tipperary, More O'Ferrall in Kildare, and Michael O'Loghlen in Dungarvan. Sharman Crawford was elected in the borough of Dundalk. In Louth, Sir Patrick Bellew, now Lord Lieutenant of the county, and his brother Montesquieu, beat off a strong Tory challenge and took both seats for the Whigs. The Repealers in Carlow could get no support among the local Whig gentlemen, and so they put up outsiders. The Tories took both seats in the county, and the seat in the borough, Colonel Bruen and his brother both being elected. In Kerry O'Connell threw his influence behind Mullins, the Whig candidate, against the Knight of Kerry. The number of O'Connell's supporters in the House of Commons (‘O’Connell’s Tail’) was estimated to be about twenty. The Catholic Whigs, Stephen Woulfe and Nicholas Ball were returned in by-elections in 1835 and 1836. Feargus O’Connor was elected in Cork but was unseated on petition, not having sufficient property. He went to England, failed to find a seat there, and devoted himself to promoting what was to be called Chartism.

Petitions against the return of Bruen and Kavanagh in Carlow and against O'Connell and Ruthven in Dublin were lodged, and parliamentary committees were appointed to examine the claims. There are indications, chiefly in the Protestant Carlow Sentinel, that the two Tory landlords were popular and received the support of some Catholic freeholders. Indeed a local magistrate had to send for a file of soldiers to protect Catholics who had voted for Colonel Bruen (Carlow Sentinel 14 March 1835). A Catholic priest accused the Rev. James Maher of telling lies. Also, it would appear that some of the Catholic clergy were not supportive of O’Connell. It would seem too that, notwithstanding the election landslide in Clare in 1828 the old habit of tenants voting for their landlord’s candidate had not died out, and that Peel’s invitation in the Tamworth Manifesto to support the Tories had reasonable hopes for success. The reason for the fanatical opposition of some of the Catholic priests to Peel is not obvious. Archbishop Murray, during the Famine, expressed a high opinion of Peel and explained to Rome that the Protestant Government was very mild, as indeed it was. The highly-charged language of the two rival Carlow newspapers at this time, and the cockpit atmosphere they reflected, were to be typical of Irish local newspapers for almost a century. Into this highly passionate conflict many Catholic priests rushed. Dr Nolan would have been better advised to forbid them to take any active part in elections. But it must also be remembered that among some Protestants the anti-popery campaign was equally strong.

In the Carlow case the Committee, dominated by Whigs and Radicals, fairly speedily accepted the allegations against the Tories and both candidates were unseated. For the by-election in Carlow O’Connell told a London merchant, Alexander Raphael, formerly a Jew but now a Catholic, that he could have the seat for £2,000. At a subsequent inquiry, O'Connell maintained that the sum referred only to the cost of essential expenses. He was cleared but people believed what they liked. A Whig gentleman named Vigors and Raphael, were elected, but were themselves promptly unseated on petition. Vigors was finally elected for Carlow county in 1837 as a radical Whig. The Rev. James Maher emerged as the chief political broker in Carlow, and charges were made against him, which were to be repeated all his life that he was careless with the truth.

O'Connell proved more difficult to remove from Dublin but it was managed eventually. An MP sat and voted in Parliament while the case against him was being examined. The resurgent Orange faction was determined to challenge every possible vote registered by members of the Trades' Political Union. O'Connell retaliated by challenging the Orange votes. As witnesses had to be brought to Westminster to testify in person for or against each vote the case dragged on for some years. When O'Connell was eventually dislodged, a member of the ‘Tail’ resigned his seat to get him back to Westminster without delay.

The above is only a section of Chapter 13 in keeping with the authors wishes regarding copyright


Parliamentary Debates


The information contained in these pages is provided solely for the purpose of sharing with others researching their ancestors in Ireland.
© 2001 Ireland Genealogy Projects, IGP TM By Pre-emptive Copyright - All rights reserved

TOP