Main |  Kentucky Data  |  Family Records   |  Photos   |  Slave Records  Tombstone Project  Vital Records   |  Surname Registry 

Look Ups!  | Acknowledgements  Queries  | Discussion Forum   |  Submissions  |  Publications  |  Site Search Contact Us

 
   

 

County Collections

Adair  Allen Anderson  Ballard  Barren  Bath  Bell  Boone  Bourbon  Boyd  Boyle  Bracken  Breathitt Breckinridge  Bullitt  Butler Caldwell  Calloway   Campbell Carlisle Carroll Carter  Casey  Christian   Clark  Clay  Clinton Crittenden Cumberland Daviess  Edmonson Elliott   Estill  Fayette Fleming  Floyd  Franklin  Fulton  Gallatin   Garrard  Grant  Graves  Grayson  Green  Greenup  Hancock  Hardin  Harlan  Harrison  Hart  Henderson  Henry  Hickman  Hopkins  Jackson  Jefferson  Jessamine  Johnson  Kenton  Knott  Knox

LaRue  Laurel Lawrence  Lee  Leslie  Letcher  Lewis  Lincoln  Livingston  Logan  Lyon  Madison Magoffin  Marion  Marshall  Martin  Mason  McCracken McCreary  Mclean Meade Menifee Mercer  Metcalfe  Monroe  Montgomery  Morgan  Muhlenberg  Nelson  Nicholas  Ohio  Oldham  Owen  Owsley  Pendleton  Perry  Pike   Powell  Pulaski  Robertson Rockcastle  Rowan  Russell  Scott  Shelby Simpson  Spencer  Taylor  Todd  Trigg  Trimble  Union  Warren  Washington  Wayne  Webster  Whitley  Wolfe Woodford

 

 
 

Excerpt from Logan Ewell Stories-Sentinel Echo Newspaper

Contributed by Jamie Grimes 3/29/2006

 

 November 20th, 1958, Sentinel-Echo Newspaper

There lived in London a harmless old colored man named HENRY WASHINGTON. Very old he was, but spry for his age and a favorite of many people of London. He was an imitator of sounds and a very good one. He was shot by his own son for no cause whatsoever and left lying in the fire. All people were shocked at this crime but no action was taken toward mob violence until after the trial of his son who received a life sentence in the penitentiary. Everyone said he should have received the death penalty.

 

Excerpts February 11th, 1960,  Sentinel-Echo Newspaper

A few weeks ago I had the pleasure of attending a supper meeting of the Scottish Rite Masons at which I was asked to make a few remarks. In making them, I spoke of the willingness of the citizens of this county to recognize true merit in their fellowmen. I mentioned two or three cases where the recognition was shown.

Since the time of my remarks was limited. I did not fully relate one incident which I had observed nearly sixty years ago in the old courthouse. I have gathered many things from this old building and in this building I learned to know the people of my county, to love the, and respect them for their sterling qualities. A very young fellow I was when one of the most vivid cases was tried before the bar of this court and it brought forth one of, I think, the finest men ever to have lived in Laurel County.

A gentleman was before the Bar. He had unwittingly committed a serious crime. He had married a young girl not quite sixteen years of age. Her family brought charges against the man, charging that he had a considerable mixture of African blood, therefore he could not lawfully marry the Caucasian.

The indicted man was a very respectable citizen, law abiding, but had not succeeded in his endeavors to amass a competence. Before the community he had little standing. Not so with his elder brother who was held in great respect by all who knew him. His acquaintance in the county was large. He came readily to the aid of his unfortunate brother, offering any and all assistance he might be able to render. He, too, was lacking in financial means but in nothing else of the makeup of a fine citizen.

He came to my father who was his sincere friend and asked my dad that he aid his brother.

Upon learning of the charges, father realized that there was little hope for the offender and small chance of fees for attorneys. My father told his friend that he would help his brother; there would be no charge. GOVERNOR JAMES D. BLACK of Barbourville, D. K. RAWLINGS of London and JAMES SPARKS all offered their services free.

The circumstances were as follows: It has been stated the man was of tainted blood. If the court decided this was so (and it did) then the accused man faced a serious criminal charge under the Consent Laws of Kentucky, a statutory crime against a girl under 16 years of age.

The lawyers discussed the case with the man and his brother in which someone made the statement that if evidence could be found refuting the fact of tainted blood the whole case would fall apart. It was here that the character of the older brother was revealed. He said: “Gentlemen, such evidence cannot be found. If it was produced, I would contradict it for the allegation is true. I will so state this on the witness stand.”

His own testimony destroyed the hope the accused man had. The marriage was set aside as null and void. The man was then tried on the criminal charge. There was nothing it seemed that a jury could do but convict him. His lawyers used everything they could think of to help him but there was no help.

When the trail had reached the time for submission to the jury the attorneys held a caucus; what should they do; did they dare argue before the jury with nothing in the way of evidence on their side? Three of these attorneys were widely known for their ability to sway jurors.

Mr. Sparks said: “Gentlemen, we cannot touch upon the evidence in this case. We will have no argument before the jury. We want them to forget this case if they can. Let’s do this; let’s let COL. EWELL take his bible in his hands, stand before these men and peach the damndest sermon since John the Baptist roamed the wilderness of the Jericho River, while the rest of us pray that the jury will give the defendant the lowest penalty.

It was done and the jury did give the lowest penalty. The accused went to the penitentiary but through the untiring efforts of the older brother and his host of friends he was eventually pardoned.

 

1962 Sentinel-Echo Newspaper

Several weeks ago the will of JOHN YOUNG, founder of the large family bearing his name in this county, was published in these columns, finding considerable favor among the readers of this paper.

Until this incident I had not given much thought to what part of Laurel County may have had in this regrettable period of time: Did we participate in slavery to any extent? If so, how were our slaves treated? What were their comforts, what attitude did the owners of these unfortunate members of a so-called inferior race, assume toward the enslaved ones the law of the land permitted them to own, the people of the African race?

Were many of them motivated by Christianity or otherwise to do with them as did John Young? Did they provide for the eventual freedom of these poor people? Were they treated according to the high principles of humanity?

Certainly I have heard from the lips of former slaves, their recollections of their life with their masters and mistresses in this region and I have listened to the recollection of the masters and mistresses. From these two sources, I came long ago to the conclusion that in this region there was not a great deal of difference in the physical welfare of master and slave. Each of them had a living and in this day and time there was not too much difference here.

The food of both of them was very similar, indeed it may have been the same, for all of it was raised upon the land of the master. Likewise the clothing was for the most part manufactured from the products of the land; their fuel for warmth came from the virgin forests which surrounded their habitation. Money was a scarce thing for both of them.

That I might know more, I searched the records of our county and have come up with the facts that (surprising to me) the people of the county were considerably engaged in this slavery; also I found that two forms of slavery existed in the county from its founding until the Emancipation Proclamation.

The colored people were owned outright, subject to trade, barter and sale forever, if not freed by their lawful owners.

Another form of slavery was practiced quite widely by the people was known as the law of “apprenticeship.” It permitted any minor, male or female, under the age of 21 to be bound as an apprentice to a qualified person under whom the child should learn a trade, with some exactions required of the manor woman receiving the minor child as to some simple schooling and an award of fifteen dollars and a dress when apprenticeship ended at 21 years of age. Such child could not be sold.

I shall give tow examples: the first illustrates one method by which a slave was acquired. From the records of our County Court:

 

“Sate of KY. Sct:

“WILLIAM FREEMAN, a resident in the State of KY. And County of Laurel, appeared before me a Justice of the Peace for said County and made oath according to the Statutes of the County and State, the he purchased in the State of Tennessee two Negro boys by name Moses and Robert from JOHN POAGUE, the bill of sale is hereunto annexed, and that he does not intend said Negroes for traffic or trade, but intends to convert them to his own use and benefit.

“Given under my hand this 22nd day of July 1827.

JEDL HIBBARD, J. P.

“Laurel Co. Ct.

“The above certificate recorded the 10th day of July 1827. Given under man hand & c.

LOT PITTMAN, CLERK.”

 

So Mr. Freeman owned the little colored boys but he would not sell them.

This form of slavery was considered less brutal than the outright without restriction sale.

I think the law permitted the passing of the boys by will.

Many reports of purchases appear on the record but so far as my examination went, no sales were recorded. Many were willed along with other goods and chattels, some were even freed.

In next week’s issue, I shall give a copy of the order enslaving the young children.

 

1962 Sentinel Echo Newspaper

To REUBEN JACKSON of said County and State.

“State of KY

Sct.

“County of Laurel

“This endure made the 2nd day of July 1827 witnesseth:

“That LOT PITTMAN, Clerk of the County Clerk of Laurel County, by order of JARVIS JACKSON, WM. FREEMAN, DAVID WEAVER, JACOB BYER, JEDH HIBBARD, WM. PITTMAN, & MARK DEES, Justice of the said County Court, do place and bind SALLY ANN NIX, orphan of NANCY NIX, age 7 years the 25th, of Sept. (Here document is torn; it probably was a provision that child should obey, show respect, etc.) toward her said Master and all the lawful commands obey during said term and the said Reuben and Jarvis Jackson for themselves, their heirs, executors and administrators do convenient and agree with the said clerk, his representatives and successors in office, that the said Sally Ann Nix as an apprentice in the trade and avocation of housewifery, shall and will isntruct during the term aforesaid and provide and allow the said apprentice sufficient meat, drink and apparel, washing, laundering and mending and all other things fit and necessary for an apprentice and shall teach or cause her to be taught reading and writing and pay her three pounds, 10 shillings, and a decent new suit of clothes at the expiration of said term of service.

“Witness our hands and seal the day and date above written.

His

“REUBEN X JACKSON (seal)

Mark

“Jarvis Jackson (seal)

“Laurel County Ct.

“The foregoing indenture recorded the 10th day of July, 1827.

“Lot Pittman, Clk.”

So by order of the Court, Mr. Jackson had a maid of all work for 14 years at which time he was to per her 15 dollars and a new dress.

On the same day JOSEPH NIX, a brother of Sally Ann, was apprenticed to Jedh Hibbard, a Magistrate of the County, with Jarvis Jackson as his surety. This young man was nine years old and he was to be taught reading, writing and common arithmetic, including the rule of three. This young man was to be taught the trade of a hatter.

I have never known where SQUIRE HIBBARD maintained his hat factory nor have I ever seen his creations nor heard of any who have, nor do we know where Squire Hibbard resided.

He must have descendents in the County and if he does so, would like some information on this man and what success he had with his hat factory,

The order enslaving the little boy is nearly the same as that binding the little girl, except in the matter of education. You will have noticed that Jackson was only required to teach the little girl reading and writing, while the Squire must add to the education of the boy some arithmetic, even “the rule of three.”

Well enough, for the times mentioned did not consider it worth while to educate the girls of the family, since few occupations outside the home had any place for them. Since Mr. Jackson apparently was not educated, I fear the little bound girl’s training was not very thorough.

I read on in this book and in 1836 I find an appraisal of the personal property of Lot Pittman, our first clerk, who appears as clerk in this narrative, was well as a sale of the property. One item sold was a particular interest. I quote it: “JACOB HACKNEY bought at sale 6 Imp. Windsor Chairs for $3.12.”

This is the way we lived in the late 1820’s and ea

 

  

 

Copyright © 2004 - 2010 C. Harvey