SELECTED NEWSPAPER PUBLICATIONS
BY FIROZE SAMEER
firozesameer@gmail.com
|
That massacre upon massacre
http://www.sundaytimes.lk/080727/Plus/sundaytimesplus_08.html
|
|
By Firoze Sameer
Sunday Times July 27, 2008
|
“We
shall have to repent in this generation,
not so much for the evil deeds of the wicked people,
but for the appalling silence of the good people.” – Dr Martin Luther King.
A
slew of eminent authors have dealt with 1983’s Black July: T. D. S. A.
Dissanayaka in “Agony of Sri Lanka” (1984); Sinha Ratnatunga in “Politics of Terrorism:
The Sri Lankan Experience” (1988); Narayan Swamy in “Tigers of Lanka” (1994);
V. P. Vittachi in “Sri Lanka
– What Went Wrong?” (1995); Professor Rajan Hoole (University Teachers for
Human Rights) in “Sri Lanka:
The Arrogance of Power: Myths, Decadence
and Murder.”
The
public commotion going on in Borella that Sunday evening,
on July 24, 1983, was heard by inmates of Welikada Prison. On July
25, prisoners condemned to death had
access to newspapers that carried the report on the ambush of Four-Four Bravo
patrol, led by Lieut. Vaas
Gunawardena, in which 13 of 15
soldiers were ambushed and killed in Jaffna
on the night of Saturday, July 23.

The
chapel at Welikada prison is built in the shape of a cross, comprising wings A3,
B3, C3 and D3 on the ground floor.
Entry to each wing is through iron doors in their respective corridors. Guards
are posted in each wing to man the locked cells abutting the corridors. Two
guards are stationed in the lobby in the spacious heart of the cross. There are
a total of 16 guards.
In
July 1983, there were 23 detainees
held under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA). TELO mandarins Kuttimani, Thangathurai,
Jegan and three others, who had
appealed against their death sentences following the Neervely bank robbery in
1981, were in one cell in B3; 28
Tamils detained under the PTA were in cells at C3; another 29 Tamil youths
taken on suspicion and due for release were in D3; and,
in A3, were dangerous criminals, including would-be escapees,
mostly Sinhalese, notable among them
being the Alitalia aircraft skyjacker,
Sepala Ekanayake, convicted after
his aborted attempt in 1982.
The
upper levels, from which the lobby
was visible from the galleries,
housed some 800 ordinary convicts. The Youthful Offenders Building (YOB), a distance away,
housed nine professionals: Doctors S. A. Tharmalingam (TELF), S. Rajasundaram (sec./Gandhiyam) and
Jeyakularajah; Fathers Singarayar and Sinnarasa; Rev. Jeyatilekarajah; Jaffna
University don M. Nithyananthan,
“Suthanthiran” editor Kovai Mahesan (TELF),
and architect Arulanandam David (president/Gandhiyam).
Mayhem
On
Monday, July 25, at 2pm,
curfew was declared. Some 400 prisoners broke out from their cells and rushed
into the lobby. Some 25 attackers reportedly caused carnage amidst screams in
B3 and D3. Acting Commissioner C. T. Jansz and his staff tried to restrain the
mob, but failed to quell the riot.
In the corridors of B3 and D3, all
35 inmates lay battered, dying and
many dead. Kuttimani’s eyes were reportedly gouged out. The prisoners in A3
continued to remain locked inside their cells.
An
unidentified Sinhalese jail guard in charge of C3 reportedly told the inmates
that “If they are to get you, it
will have to be over my dead body.” He hid the cell door keys in the toilet, and,
when the attackers arrived,
stretched his arms, and faced the
mob, forcing it to retreat. Douglas
Devananda, Manikkathasan, Paranthan Rajan,
Panagoda Maheswaran were in C3.
According
to Professor Hoole, Lieut. Mahinda
Hathrusinghe, of the 4th Artillery
in charge of the platoon guarding Welikada Prison,
on receiving a call from Mr. Jansz for help,
rushed to the chapel section with seven soldiers armed with SLRs, and claimed: “The crowd upon seeing us dropped
their weapons and started running upstairs.”
Mr.
Jansz dashed to the Borella police station,
only to hear that the station was short-staffed. He next visited Senior DIG
Sunderalingam in Gregory’s Road, who
was preparing to leave for the Security Council meeting. When Mr. Jansz
returned to Welikada Prison, he saw
Borella police personnel ambling outside the prison precincts. They were
“reluctant to enter, as it was
guarded by army personnel”, in
contravention of the Prisons Ordinance,
which requires that the police be called in at any sign of trouble.
Jailor
Rogers Jayasekere, President J. R.
Jayewardene’s supporter in Kelaniya,
allegedly played from behind the scenes while the killings were in progress, while jailor Samitharatne alias Samitha Rathgama
and location officer Palitha’s roles were apparently tenuous on that fateful
day.
Lieut.
Hathurusinghe would not allow the truck containing 35 bodies to leave the
prison precints for the Accident Service until he received approval from the
top. Over the telephone, the major
in charge of the unit told him that “permission for such removal would have to
be granted by the secretary to the Ministry of Defence”,
who was Col. C. A. Dharmapala, who
was present at the Security Council meeting at Army Headquarters, chaired by President J. R. Jayewardene. Mr. Jansz
then visited the General
Hospital and met with
hospital director Dr. Lucian Jayasuriya to make arrangements to admit the
injured.
Mr.
Jansz then telephoned the Army Commander Major General (later General) Tissa
Weeratunga from DIG Ernest Perera’s office,
seeking permission to release the truck. The general told Mr. Jansz to convey
his “no objections” to the army platoon commander. However, Mr. Jansz suggested the general issue instructions
to his staff. Mr. Jansz then called on IGP Rudra Rajasingham and DIG
Sunderalingam, who appeared to be
helpless.When Mr. Jansz returned to Welikada Prison,
he saw the truck parked in the compound and learned that “35 bodies in the
truck were heaped for removal”, and
that the prison doctor, Dr.
Perimpanayagam, had examined the
victims at the gate, after a lapse
of about an hour, and pronounced
them all dead.
Suriya
Wickremasinghe, civil rights
activist and daughter of Dr. S. A. Wickremasinghe,
notes: “… We know from eyewitnesses,
and which appears likely from the inquest evidence,
that the bodies were attacked again on the floor of the lobby to make sure they
were dead. They were dragged into the compound and attacked there. They were
thrown into the truck, and according
to some eyewitness accounts, the
sound of bodies being attacked even inside the truck could be heard. Indeed, according to one of our witnesses, one young prisoner (Kanapathipillai Mylvaganam, 19 years,
5 feet, 1 inch), who had succeeded in hiding,
was actually killed in the compound by a jailor.” She also notes the fact that
there were some 17 jailors in Welikada prison at the time of the masssacre, but only one jail guard,
locked in B3, testified.
Post-mortem
The
JMO, Dr. M. S. L. Salgado, was facing difficulties to procure from the police
the magistrate’s order to perform a post-mortem examination on the 35 bodies.
Colombo chief magistrate Keerthi Srilal Wijewardene,
followed a protracted process to issue one,
vis-à-vis implications in Emergency Regulation 15A of 18.07.83 of the gazette
extraordinary made by J. R. Jayewardene,
under the Public Security Ordinance,
which allowed any gazetted police officer not below the rank of ASP or any
authorised officer, with the
approval of the secretary to the Ministry of Defence,
to take possession and disposal of any dead body without reference to any other
legal provision.
Inquest
Secretary
to the Ministry of Justice, Mervyn
Wijesinghe, DSG Tilak Marapone and
Senior State Counsel C. R. de Silva assisted the court on July 26 at 4.20pm.
Despite the fact that a lawyer could have represented the victims, if one had applied to the Attorney General’s
department, no such person emerged
to do so.
Prisoner
Kandiah Rajendran (alias Robert),
who was in a nearby cell and witnessed what had happened in the lobby, gave a statement,
which was recorded by Suriya Wickremasinghe. Rajendran was killed in the second
prison massacre.
The
Sinhala radio announcement on the night of the 25th was heard by the C3
prisoners from the jailor’s room close by. The magistrate observed that “none
of those prisoners who could be eyewitnesses … have volunteered to give
evidence …”
SP Leo de Silva complied with the request made on July 26 at 3 p.m. by Thambapillai
(Panagoda) Maheswaran, Paranthan
Rajan and Douglas Devananda to transfer the 28 detainees in C3. On July 27, at 1 a.m.,
the prisoners were transferred to the YOB,
but housed three each in one cell and four in one cell,
despite their request to be housed all together. The nine professionals in the
YOB were transferred to the dormitory upstairs.
The
inquest was concluded in the early hours of July 27,
after the post-mortem reports were in,
but the bodies were not handed over to the next of kin. The magistrate
considered an application by Inspector H. Y. (Hyde) de Silva for possession of
the bodies, under ER15A, while DSG Marapone,
presumably representing the AG, had
no objection, notwithstanding
authorisation reportedly being required by the secretary to the Ministry of
Defence, instead of the AG. The
bodies were wrapped in white sheets and disposed of at Kanatte Cemetery, Borella,
shortly before dawn, where they were
dumped into a large pit and burnt.
Tiger Friday: July 27
The
temporary transfer of prisoners to the YOB,
with the approval of the secretary,
Ministry of Justice and on the directions of the chief magistrate, proved a failure. A query made to former Deputy
Commissioner of Prisons, R. J. N.
Jordan, evoked the response: “Why
were they not transferred to the safety of the Magazine prison? The 1962 coup
defendants were housed over there in absolute safety.” This was subject to
receiving direct orders from the detaining authority,
who was the then Deputy Minister of Defence T. B. Werapitiya, whom Mr. Jansz tried hard to contact, but failed.
Mr.
Jansz shared his fears with the secretary,
Ministry of Justice, that morning
that a second attack was imminent. Mr. Jansz,
was present at the Security Council meeting in the afternoon, where President J. R. Jayewardene had advised him
to liaise with Brigadier Mano Madawela to transfer the remaining prisoners to
the Batticaloa prison. According to Sinha Ratnatunga (page 30), “… President Jayewardene wanted the rest of the
prisoners sent immediately to the Jaffna
prisons, but Ministers Lalith
Athulathmudali and Ranil Wickremesinghe opposed it,
saying that the Sinhalese would become further infuriated over such a decision.
When a compromise was suggested,
Negombo, close to the International Airport,
the President opposed it, saying
there would be a repeat performance there.”
The second massacre
On
Mr. Jansz’s return to Welikada Prison,
he discovered that a second massacre had occurred at around 4p.m., when curfew had just begun,
and that 17 of the 28 suspects formerly housed in C3 had died, with one professional,
Rajasunderam. In all, 53 of the 72, or 74 percent,
of the PTA detainees were dead. The SP,
his two ASPs and two jailors were reportedly absent that day. Commissioner J.
P. Delgoda returned to the country that night after attending an overseas
conference.
The
same participants of the first inquest attended the second inquest, held on July 28 at 1 p.m.,
assisted by ASP Packeer of the CDB. The inquest ended on July 29 at 12.05 a.m.
Chief jailor W. M. Karunaratne testified that he had,
via the prison intelligence system,
learned of a proposed “mass jail break by prisoners”,
and had conveyed the news to Mr. Jansz that morning.
Prisons
overseer Don Alfred had approached wing A3 at 4 p.m. to serve the night meal. He
found the cell doors open and the prisoners ambling inside the corridor. On
opening the iron door, he was
overpowered by the prisoners. They,
with about 300 other prisoners armed with poles,
axes, crowbars,
iron bars with sharp points and a saw (all seized from the woodshed, as in the first massacre),
then ran towards the YOB. Dr. Rajasundaram,
who approached the mob in an attempt to reason with them,
lost his life. Dr. Tharmalingam, who
was in his seventies, urged the
defenders to fight back and save the rest of the professionals.
Suriya
Wickremasinghe noted that not a single prison officer was able to identify a
single rioter, and that an
identification parade was never held following both prison massacres.
Major
(later Colonel) Sunil Peiris and his commando team of 12 arrived in two jeeps
within less than 20 minutes of Mr. Jansz’s call to Army Headquarters, and were deployed into action. Prisoner-skyjacker
Sepala Ekanayake was reportedly the first to enter the YOB. Ekanayake displayed
an object he was carrying in his hand,
and said to the approaching Major Peiris: “Sir,
kohomada vede?” The major was horrified (in his words,
it was “like the head of John the Baptist on a charger”),
who then smashed his fist into Ekayanake’s face and felled him. The commandos
fired into the air, and at two
attackers, and entered the YOB, also firing tear gas.
Major
Sunil Peiris moved the Tamil prisoners out of Welikada that very night;
bringing out Mrs. Nithyanandan, a
graduate from a US university, from
the female ward, and her husband, who was in YOB,
and transporting all 20 to the Galle Face Green late that night and putting
them into two buses bound for the Katunayake airbase,
from where they were airlifted to Batticaloa prison. In September 1983, all escaped,
except Fr. Singarayer, who opted to
face trial, and Dr. Tharmalingam, who was too old to leave.
Two-and-a-half decades on, the echoes of screams reverberate between the drab
walls of Welikada’s chapel and the Youth
Offenders Building.
Words by the English writer Thomas Hardy come to mind: “While much is too
strange to be believed, nothing is
too strange to have happened.”
|
Sunday Times July 20, 2008
Hollywood
plots Hitler thriller
http://www.sundaytimes.lk/080720/Plus/sundaytimesplus_11.html
|
|
By
Firoze Sameer
|
|
The
day is Thursday, July 20, 1944,
the time 12.42 hours, and the
place the Nazi nerve centre, the
Wolfsschanze (Wolf’s Lair), in
Rastenberg, East Prussia. The
scene is a military conference. The room is filled with black-suited SS
officers standing around as the chief of operations of the army high command, General Adolf Heusinger,
reads a report on the central Russian front. Chairing the conference is Adolf
Hitler, and with him are 23 other
Nazi officers.
A
time bomb explodes from below the table,
killing four. The blast is the culmination of Operation Valkyrie, organised by a group of army officers. Hilter
survives.
Director
Bryan Singer and his team are presently working on a Hollywood
film based on the World War II incident. The United Artists’ US$100 million
production, titled “Valkyrie”, is slated for release on February 13, 2009. Shooting commenced at the Bendlerblock
memorial in Germany
last July. The official trailer is now on YouTube. Tom Cruise acts as the key
instigator of the revolt, Colonel
Claus Schenk Count Stauffenberg,
chief-of-staff to Col-Gen. Erich Fromm (Tom Wilkinson),
commander of the reserve or home army.
|

|
|
Tom Cruise as Col. Claus Von Stauffenberg. (Pic
courtesy firstshowing.net)
|
The
plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler is well documented in a number of books, including British historian Alan Bullock’s
“Hitler” (1952); John Wheeler-Bennett’s “The Nemesis of Power” (1953);
Constantine Fitzgibbon’s “The Shirt of Nessus” (1955); William Shirer’s “The
Rise and Fall of the Third Reich” (1960); Jacques Delarue’s “The Gestapo”
(1962); and Roger Manvell and Heinrich Fraenkel’s “The July Plot” (1964), and the brilliant 822-page “Inside the Third
Reich” (1970), by Hitler’s
armaments minister Albert Speer.
A
Roman Catholic aristocrat, Col.
Stauffenberg arrives at the Rastenberg conference attired in a field-grey
Wehrmacht uniform, glittering with
an array of medals, including the
Iron Cross 1st Class, the Wound
Badge and the German Cross, both
in gold. He cuts a remarkable figure: he is wearing a black eye-patch, the result of a war incident in Tunisia, on April 7,
1943, when his staff car was
riddled with fire from low-flying aircraft,
causing him to lose his right hand and arm,
two fingers of his left hand and his left eye,
with injuries to his left ear and knee.
The
colonel walks into the room carrying a briefcase containing a time bomb.
Depending on what side you were on,
Stauffenberg’s act was either heroic or high treason. When Marcus Brutus
delivered the coup de grâce in the assassination of Roman dictator Julius
Cæsar, he said he was doing so not
because he loved Cæsar less, but
because he loved Rome
more. Every German officer had to pledge a personal oath of loyalty to Adolf
Hitler.
Hitler’s
early victories saw the Third Reich taking control of almost the whole of
Europe, sections of Scandinavia, the Balkans and North Africa.
It was during Hitler’s advance on Russia, when the German army had almost reached Moscow, that the tide turned.
Following
the failed plot to kill Hitler,
Col. Stauffenberg and three other officers faced a summary court martial
decreed by Gen. Friedrich Fromm. They were shot that very evening, on July 21,
1944, in the courtyard of the
Bendlerstrasse by a firing squad of 10 men commanded by a lieutenant. Fromm
turned the tables on the conspirators when the putsch misfired. But it did
not save his neck. He finally faced a firing squad on March 19, 1945.
Those
who fell with Stauffenberg that evening were his adjutant, Lieut. Werner von Haeften; Col. Gen Freidrich
Olbricht (played by actor Bill Nighy); head of the supply section of the
reserve army, and his
chief-of-staff, Col. Mertz von
Quirnheim (Christian Berkel). Gen. Ludwig Beck (Terence Stamp), who was Franz Halder’s predecessor as chief of
the army general staff, was given
the option of shooting himself,
which he failed in doing twice. He was dispatched by a sergeant.
Major
Otto Ernst Remer and SS Obersturmbannfuehrer (Lieut. Col.) Otto Skorzeny, both holders of the Knight’s Cross with oak
leaves, were key bulwarks against
the conspirators and contributed indefatigably towards quashing the coup.
Major
Remer (Thomas Kretschmann), who
commanded the guard battalion inside Berlin, was ordered by Lieut-Gen. Paul von Hase, commandant of Berlin,
who was a conspirator, to throw a
cordon around the ministry buildings in the Wilhelmstrasse and the SS
security offices. However, Remer
was confused and referred to propaganda minister Dr Joseph Goebbels, who put through Remer on a priority call to
Hitler. The Fuehrer directly instructed Major Remer to quell the coup, promoting him two grades to full colonel.
Shirer
writes: “On July 24, the Nazi
salute was made compulsory in place of the old military salute ‘as a sign of
the Army’s unshakeable allegiance to the Fuehrer and of the closest unity
between Army and Party’.” View www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQgESliKQUA. Col. Remer
was made major-general and given command of the legendary Panzer
Führer-Begleit division.
Lieut.-Col.
Skorzeny, famous for rescuing
Mussolini in a daring operation in September 1943,
was hauled out of his sleeping berth on the night-express to Vienna when it
stopped at Lichterfeld, where
repeated announcements went over the tannoy for him to immediately report to
Berlin on the instructions of SS Brigadefuehrer (Maj-Gen.) Walther
Schellenberg, the number two man
in the SD. Skorzeny’s company entered the Bendlestrasse and took control from
within, while Remer’s detachment
isolated the entire block.
Former
Afrika Korps commander Field Marshal Erwin Rommel’s role in the conspiracy
was revealed after the war. Although the “Desert Fox” was privy to the plot, he favoured arresting rather than killing
Hitler. Rommel’s last posting was as commandant of Army Group B amongst five
other army groups spread out in northern France in defence of the D-Day
operation. Rommel’s staff car was strafed on July 17 and he sustained major
head injuries. On October 14, 1944, Rommel was given the option of suicide by poison, followed by a state funeral with full military
honours, instead of facing treason
in the People’s Court. Rommel chose suicide.
Field
Marshal Guenther von Kluge was replaced by Field Marshal Walther Model as the
army group commander in France, and was recalled to Berlin. On his way by car near Verdun, Kluge (who,
like Fromm, switched sides on
learning of Hitler’s escape),
probably guessed the game was up and committed suicide by poison.
Col.
Gen Heinrich von Stuelpnagel, the
military governor of France, moved to arrest all SS and SD personnel in Paris. SS
Obergruppenfuehrer (Gen.) Karl Oberg and his deputy,
SS Obersturmbanfuehrer (Lieut-Col.) Dr Helmuth Knochen,
with their troops were later released after the coup had gone awry. Recalled
to Berlin,
Steulpnagel, shot himself at Verdun during a car
journey, only to blind himself in
both eyes. He and Lieut. Col. Caesar von Hofacker,
who served on his staff, were sentenced
to death and hanged.
Shirer
states the Gestapo recorded 7,000
arrests, and another source some 4,980 deaths,
but the figure is thought to be much higher.
The
SS, its intelligence unit the SD, the Gestapo,
and a series of departments fell under the umbrella of the
Reichssicherheitshauptamt or RSHA (Reich Security Main Office), headed by SS Obergruppenfuehrer (Gen.) Dr Ernst
Kaltenbrunner. He was placed in charge of the Special Commission of July 20
by Hitler (David Bamber) and Himmler (Matthias Freihof),
now Commander in Charge of the reserve army,
and conducted extensive investigations and interrogations to round up even
those remotely connected with the attempt.
According
to Manvell and Fraenkel, Hitler
appointed a military court of honour led by field marshals Wilhelm Keitel, Gerd von Rundstedt and Col. Gen Heinz Guderian, who replaced Gen. Kurt Zeitzler as chief of the
general staff, “to dismiss from
the Army all officers remotely concerned in the putsch”. The conspirators
were tried by Roland Freisler in his People’s Court as civilians and hanged, instead of facing a firing squad. Notable was
the acquittal of Rommel’s chief of staff Maj-Gen. Dr Hans Speidel, a conspirator.
The
architect of the conspiracy,
Maj-Gen. Henning von Trescow (Kenneth Branagh),
chief-of-staff in the central army group,
Eastern Front, walking on no-man’s
land towards the Russian Forces,
exploded a hand grenade and died.
Trescow’s
last words to von Schlabrendorff were: “God once promised Abraham to spare Sodom should there be
found 10 just men in the city. He will,
I hope, spare Germany
because of the thing that we have done,
and not destroy her … Whoever joined the resistance movement put on the shirt
of Nessus. The worth of a man is certain only if he is prepared to sacrifice
his life for his convictions.”
|
Ravi Perera's
interesting account in the Daily News of May 10 (Saturday) of the Allied defeat
at Dunkirk in Northern France in 1940 prompts me to add a postscript on some of
the kudos and consequences faced by Adolf Hitler's top field commanders in
their victories and failures in the Western and Eastern theatres of war.
The Western Front:
Consequent upon the success of that blitzkreig recounted by Ravi Perera in
which almost all Europe was overrun by the
Germans, one is inevitably reminded
of Adolf Hitler's Reichstag speech on the evening of July 19, 1940.
In that landmark
speech, Hitler made his final peace
offer to Britain, arguably the highpoint of his chequered career, having issued Directive No. 16 three days earlier
seeking to prepare for a landing operation in England by mid-August, to be launched as Operation Sea Lion.
American historian, William L. Shirer in his 1,436-page
masterpiece The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1960) at p-904 writes a
footnote thus: "There was a colourful scene and one unprecedented in
German history when Hitler suddenly broke off his speech in the middle to award
field-marshals' batons to twelve Generals and a special king-size one to
Goering, who was given the newly
created rank of Reich Marshal of the Greater German Reich,
which put him above all the others.
He was also awarded
the Grand Cross of the Iron Cross,
the only one given during the entire war. ...Nine Army Generals were promoted
to field-marshal: Brauchitsch,
Keitel, Rundstedt, Bock,
Leeb, List,
Kluge, Witzleben and Reichenau; and
three Luftwaffe officers: Milch,
Kesselring and Sperrle." Franz Halder,
Chief of the Army General Staff, was
passed over in only being promoted one grade from General to Colonel-General
(Generalobersten).
The sequel to Dunkirk was evidently Operation Overlord, the massive Allied invasion of Europe on June 6, 1944 globally known as D-Day,
and fought tenaciously on Normandy's beaches
in Utah,
Omaha, Gold,
Juno and Sword.
The title of author
Cornelius Ryan's book, The Longest
Day, was reportedly picked from a
quote by Field Marshal Erwin Rommel,
who foreboded the first twenty four hours of the impending invasion on the
North-Western regions of France. Daryl F Zanuck's 1962-movie of the same title
is now legion.
The Eastern Front:
Notwithstanding the German-Soviet non-aggression pact entered into days before
WWII began, it was ironical the two
dictators, Marshal Josef Stalin and
Adolf Hitler, reportedly never met.
However, almost sixteen months into the pact, the Fuehrer issued Top Secret Directive No.21
dated Dec-18, 1940, referring to the proposed attack on Russia, to be launched on May-15 as Operation Barbarossa.
As fate would have it, a coup in Belgrade
caused Hitler to make a catastrophic decision to raze Yugoslavia and also subdue Greece, and thereby postpone the Russian campaign which
effectively began on June-22. The loss of those four vital weeks changed the
course of history.
Almost six months
later, the tide turned against the
Wehrmacht, and December 6, 1941 was considered as a fateful turning point in
the history of the Third Reich. In the Eastern Front,
amidst sub-zero temperatures, Hitler
retired some top commanders in late 1941/early1942.
They included field
marshals Brauchitsch, von Runstedt, von Bock,
von Leeb, von Reichenau who died of
a stroke. Also Colonel-General Heinz Guderian the panzer corps genius. Lieut.
Gen. Udet of the Luftwaffe had shot himself to death on November 17, 1941. Shirer states that,
"Moreover, some thirty-five
corps and divisional commanders were replaced during the winter retreat."
Worst case scenarios
on the Eastern Front were depicted where Colonel-General Erich Hoepner, a brilliant tank commander of the 4th Armoured
Group within sight of Moscow
from the north, pushed back. He was
dismissed, stripped of his rank and
forbidden to wear a uniform. Gen. Hoepner,
a member of the July 20 plot, was
tried and executed in August 1944 as recounted in-depth in The July Plot by
Roger Manvell and Heinrich Fraenkel (1964).
General Hans Count von
Sponeck, Ritterkreuz holder for the
airborne landings in The Hague in 1940, pulled back one division of his corps in the Crimea on December 29,
1941, after Russian troops landed by
sea behind his lines.
He was stripped of his
rank and imprisoned, court-martialed
and at the insistence of Hitler,
sentenced to death. He was executed after the July 1944 plot to kill Hitler in
which he was not involved.
A contrast is seen on
the fates of two field marshals: Friedrich Paulus and the monocled Walter Model, Hitler's Fireman. Paulus surrendered his ill-fated
6th Army at Stalingrad to the Russians one day after the Fuehrer promoted him
field marshal on January 30, 1943, while Model,
on April 21, 1945 when his Army
Group B got isolated in the Ruhr pocket, shot himself in the head.
Summary: Field Marshal
Erich Von Manstein, considered as
the most brilliant Field Commander in WWII,
testifying at Nuremberg, as
recounted by Shirer on page-1078,
told the tribunal that, "Of
seventeen field marshals ten were sent home during the war, and three lost their lives as a result of July 20, 1944 (the abortive plot to assassinate Hitler: a
Hollywood movie titled Valkyrie starring Tom Cruise is scheduled for release in
2009). Only one field-marshal managed to get through the war and keep his
position.
Of thirty-six full
Generals (Generalobersten) eighteen were sent home and five died as a result of
July 20 or were dishonourably discharged.
Only three full
Generals survived the war in their positions."
FIROZE SAMEER
25.May.2008: He lit a flame that thrilled audiences through
the ages:
Ian Fleming Birth Centenary: 28.05.08
(Sunday Times Plus, p-4). http://www.sundaytimes.lk/080525/Plus/plus000011.html
He lit a flame
that thrilled audiences through the ages
By Firoze Sameer
Sometime in 1964, Savoy cinema in Colombo screened the first James
Bond movie Dr No, with Sean Connery
aiming that .25 Beretta fitted with a silencer; the sexy Ursula Andress in that
inevitable white bikini with side-strapped dagger emerging like a phoenix from
the Caribbean sea.
|

|
|
Ian Fleming,
the
creator of the world’s most famous secret agent,
James Bond, would have been 100
years old on May 28
|
We were then grade ten
students at Royal College Colombo. Connery in the plush casino answering a
beaut across the green baize, “Bond, James Bond,”
while lighting one of his Morland Specials with a gunmetal Ronson against that
famous theme, made an indelible
impact in a bizarre way on our sensitive psyches. We switched from reading
Chase to Fleming’s Bond books. Although we did not know it then, Ian Fleming had died in the same year on August
12.
Façade
The navy blue worsted
suit, white sea island cotton shirt, black hand-woven silk tie,
dark blue socks into black moccasins,
7.65mm Walther PPK in a Burns Martin shoulder holster,
oxidized cigarette case; glass of dry Martini shaken but not stirred, the solid portrayal of the hero macho-man, all had some amazing impact on our imagination in
that bygone era, where imitation in
its variant forms became somewhat of a fashion.
Celebrations
The Royal Mail
reportedly marked Ian Lancaster Fleming’s birth centenary that falls on May 28, 2008 by issuing six stamps on January 8 and
featuring different editions of six of his most famous novels: Casino Royale, Dr No,
Goldfinger, Diamonds are Forever, For Your Eyes Only and From Russia with Love.
Planned celebrations in Britain
include the worldwide publication of Devil May Care,
the brand new Bond novel by Sebastian Faulks,
and a major exhibition celebrating Fleming's life at the Imperial
War Museum
in London.
Works
Fleming wrote 21
James Bond stories comprising a dozen full length novels plus eight short
stories, plus a five-page mood-piece
007 in New York, between Jan-52 and his demise in Aug-64. Kingsley
Amis (later Sir/CBE) continued the series with Colonel Sun in 1968, John Gardner with 14-novels between 1981 and 1995, and six by Raymond Benson from 1997 to 2002.
Christopher Wood did two novelisations during 1977-79,
while Garner and Benson made three each.
Fleming did four
non-fiction works, delving into
fourteen thrilling cities of the world; the diamond-smuggling trade; a
children’s book; the stillborn State of Excitement
on Kuwait, and one-and-a-half pages on the Greek Syndicate
‘dealer’ Zographos. LIFE Magazine of 17.03.61 reported Fleming’s fifth opus, From Russia,
With Love, in JFK’s list of ten best
novels, a copy of which Jacqueline
Kennedy presented to CIA director Allen Dulles.
Background
A junior partner at
Rowe and Pitman, a solid firm of
stockbrokers in London, Fleming did a weekly stint as ATTICUS in the
Sunday Times, and served as foreign
manager at the Kemsley Group of Newspapers. He had broken stints at Eton and
Sandhurst, and then came under the
tutelage of Forbes and Phyllis Dennis in Kitzbuhel, Austria.
Failing to join the Foreign Service,
he moved to Reuters and covered a famous spy trial in Russia in March 1933.
|

|
|
The original Bond girl:
Ursula Andress in a scene from Dr. No
|
During WW2, Fleming served as a lieutenant in the Special
Branch in the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve,
and was recruited as PA to the Director of Naval Intelligence, Rear (later Vice) Admiral John Godfrey. Fleming
began to closely track the career of Hitler’s indefatigable commando, SS-Sturmbannführer (Lieut-Col.) Otto Skorzeny
after Crete fell to the Nazis in May-41.
Skorzeny, amongst some daring
exploits, rescued Mussolini
imprisoned in the Gran Sasso mountain in central Italy,
in a blitz-like operation in July-43,
literally stunning Europe.
Elder brother Peter
Fleming a barrister, attended Eton
and Oxford and
served with the Grenadier Guards. The brothers were commissioned by Maj. Gen.
Sir Colin Gubbins, the prime mover
of SOE, to set up the secret
Auxiliary Units. In 1945, while
Peter returned home as a colonel with an OBE,
Ian, came back as a naval commander
only with Denmark’s Commander’s Cross of the Order of Dannebrog. However, Peter’s acclaimed literary works, which sprang from his extensive global travels, were later outshone by Ian’s global popularity.
Ian’s father, Major Valentine Fleming,
MP, DSO,
was killed in action in WW1 20.05.1917,
prompting Winston Churchill to write his Obit in The Times. Ian’s son, Caspar,
died of a drug overdose at age 23 on 02.10.75,
and his wife Lady Rothermere of cancer in July-81.
Writing
Goldeneye was Ian’s
14-acre plush retreat on the Jamaican
North Shore.
In these pleasant seafront precincts he completed Casino Royale on his old
Imperial typewriter in January 1952. Thereafter,
in every successive year he produced a novel within eight weeks on a brand new U.S. gold-plated typewriter, clocking 2,000-words
a day, putting in an hour’s work in
the evening, finishing off with some
70,000-words,
while Britain
froze in winter.
Movies
Sean Connery (later
Sir/Kt) established the Bond image featuring in seven movies continued with an
equal number by Roger Moore (later Sir/KBE) with George Lazenby featuring only
in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. Timothy Dalton featured in two, Pierce Brosnan in four and Daniel Craig in the
last two, Casino Royale (2006) and
Quantum of Solace budgeted at U$230-million due for release 31-Oct-08.
Box Office/Budget
A total box office
raking of U$4.4bn (U$11.1bn inflation-adjusted) against a budget of U$1.1
billion cover the 22-movies already made. The non-EON-film Casino Royale (1967)
and Never Say Never Again (1983) clocked a combined box office of U$204.4
million (U$ 605.7 million inflation-adjusted) against a budget of U$48 million.
Future
The Bond cult will
decidedly burn out with the passage of time as seen in various other fancies
which have thrilled readers and audiences all over the world.
Nevertheless, let’s think about and thank Ian Fleming who in
some small way brought about a significant and sustained impact and thrill in
the imaginative lives of generations across the world over the last five
decades.
May 10, 1940
Decisive day in
World War II
Ravi PERERA
“A
perfect modern battle plan is like nothing so much as a score for an orchestral
composition, where the various arms
and units are the instruments, and
the tasks they perform are their respective musical phrases.
Every individual unit
must, make its entry precisely at
the proper moment, and play its part
in the general harmony” Lieutenant-General Sir John Monash, Commander Australian Corps,
1918
When the German Army
burst in to Poland
on the first day of September 1939 it became evident to the world that before
their anxious eyes was unfolding a superlative performance by an army, which had adopted a completely new approach to
warfare.
On that day Hitler
unleashed his highly trained and motivated soldiers on a relatively inferior
but brave Polish Army, with orders
that they bring the enemy to heel within the shortest possible time. The real
threat to his designs was in the Western front where he faced the formidable
French and allied armies.
German
attack
The German Army
attacking Poland
was a couple of million strong and were organised in to several armies. Driving
the newly created Panzer divisions into Poland along their long border the
Germans were soon in the rear areas of the massed Polish forces thus compelling
the Poles to fight on all sides, a
hopeless situation for a large army.
Until then it was not
thought possible to handle huge armies on such rapid manoeuvres, a feat the Germans achieved that September. This
mobility of the attacking forces decided the issue within days, once again proving the vaunted military skills of
the Teutons.
The final result was
never in doubt, the only question
being the length of time the Poles could hold on for in the face of the severe
punishment meted out to them.
The Panzer divisions, which had rapidly moved over the flat countryside
of Poland, were relentlessly attacking the rear areas
hampering the attempts of the Polish army to regroup. The German air force
mercilessly bombed the desperate defenders pinning them down. By the 28th of
September the battle was virtually over.
Centuries before, Roman legions patrolling the dark uncharted
northern forests of Europe became aware of the
fierce and robust tribes that inhabited those parts,
eventually coming to dread them.
Through the succeeding
years as the Germans gradually evolved in to a powerful nation they acquitted
themselves very well indeed,
becoming leaders in science,
technology, literature, philosophy and even music.
But in 1914 in an act
confirming an atavistic militarism they ignited the First World War, which engulfed the whole of Europe
for four long years.
The powerful cannons
of that conflict blew away for good the existing order,
which at the time seemed to be everlasting. Only the massive intervention of
the Americans tilted the balance against the formidable German army. The
universal disorder that followed the unprecedented blood bath led to the
creation of both the Communist government in Russia
as well as Adolf Hitler in Germany.
The
triumph
The quick triumph
against the Poles in 1939 highlighted the menace that this capable race, rearmed and belligerent,
now posed. Armoured Divisions,
capable of rapid mobility and carrying formidable firepower were going to be
the cutting edge of their mighty sword.
The thrusting Armour
would be ably supported by the devastating air power of the Luftwaffe and
deadly accurate artillery.
Like in the earlier
war, this formidable military
machine could depend on the brilliant leadership provided by its outstanding
General Staff. And above all, the
German soldier, capable, strong,
disciplined and brave was ready to answer the call to arms.
Having vanquished Poland,
Hitler had to then deal with France, and the supporting British forces in the West. In
training and capability these forces were perhaps on par with the Germans while
in equipment even stronger, though
not effectively distributed or utilized as the Germans. However in spirit and
commitment, as events would reveal, they were far below the Germans.
Most of the German
General Staff officers involved in the planning of the impending attack on the
Western front had experienced their baptism of fire in the First World War as
junior officers.
Despite their recent
success in Poland, with methods evolved in the intervening
twenty-five years, they were
powerfully influenced by that gigantic struggle of their youth when they fought
in the muddy plains of Western Europe.
France, an advanced nation
with a powerful army was not with Poland. They argued that the way to
bring her down was to launch a powerful attack through the low-countries, Holland and Belgium, by passing the Maginot Line,
and seizing a large area of the Channel coast.
The plan envisaged destroying
the large enemy formations in northern France,
including the British forces based there,
and eventually making it untenable for the remaining French forces to resist.
Some among the senior
planners however were dissatisfied with the limited scope of the plan offered
by the army high command. They were of the opinion that the enemy’s potential
strengths was the very reason why the Germans should deliver a fatal blow
before those strengths could be mobilized and brought to bear on the
battlefield.
Manstein, a relatively junior officer then, wrote with chilling professionalism of the
proposed plan “I found it humiliating,
to say the least, that our
generation could not do nothing better than repeat an old recipe, even when this was the product of a man like
Schlieffen.
What could possibly be
achieved by turning up a war plan our opponents had already rehearsed with us
once before and against whose repetition they were bound to have taken full
precaution?”
A daring
plan
They suggested instead
a more daring plan, which envisaged
a major offensive through the difficult terrain of the Ardennes.
The proponents of this plan argued that the French least expected an attack
here and if an initial impetus could be gained there she could be fatally
wounded.
When the Germans
emerged in France out of the
Ardennes forest,
while splitting the French forces in two,
they would be in the rear of the French forces facing the low-countries for the
expected attack there.
To overcome the
geographical challenges the Ardennes forest
posed they proposed utilizing newly acquired capabilities of the army, including tracked vehicles,
predominantly the proven Panzers.
Famed Tank commanders
like General Guderian saw the exciting possibilities this somewhat unorthodox
idea presented, while the much
respected Colonel General Von Rundstedt who was in the highest ranks of the
army whole heartedly endorsed it.
It is a testimony to
the selfless professionalism and the cold rationality of the German Army that
an audacious plan suggested by only a minority of officers came to be endorsed
over the former plan, which had been
proposed by the hierarchy. Hitler,
the evil genius, very open to new
ideas in such matters, also became
an ardent enthusiast.
The stage was now set
for one of the most swift and decisive military victories of the modern era.
While the resourceful
German Army was preparing for the attack purposefully,
the French side was remarkably complacent. The Chief of her army was the
68-year-old General Maurice Gamelin who epitomized the axiom that no man is in
a hurry to conclude that the skills and knowledge he has devoted a lifetime to
acquire are obsolete.
He did not think that
air power would play a significant role in modern warfare and belittled the
importance of radio communication refusing to have a radio in his headquarters
fearing it might reveal its location to the enemy. When questioned about the
length of time he took to communicate his orders to the frontlines, Gamelin’s casual answer was forty-eight hours.
Had Gamelin an inkling
of the catastrophic defeat ahead for France he would not have been that
nonchalant. While the French commander was finding comfort in wishful thinking, the Wehrmacht was planning in secrecy a campaign
of unprecedented velocity against Gamelin’s weakest flank.
France defeated
The German attack was
to be led by the powerful Panzer divisions closely supported by a tireless
Luftwaffe. Unlike the French the Germans fully embraced modern technology, using radio communication to coordinate and direct
the attack.
Gamelin’s failure to
appreciate the huge potential of the air force proved to be just as disastrous
as his decision to disperse his armoured strength mostly in an infantry support
role, thus leaving the task of
countering the powerful thrusts of the German Panzer divisions to formations
organized in the mode of the earlier war.
The Wehrmacht on the
other hand was determined to cut through France in one strong drive, which would leave the enemy it in a hopeless
situation. Much thought was given to the composition of the Panzer divisions
and the tactics of the advance.
The number of Panzers
in the establishment, the supporting
artillery, the infantry component
and the all important engineers attached to a divisions were decided primarily
on the need for maximum speed and logistical coherence.
Nothing was to
interfere with the speed of the advance. When serious resistance was
encountered, more often the infantry
was sent in to deal with it, while
the Panzers kept moving forward to a pre-determined schedule.
The determination of
the Germans to gain a decisive ascendancy in the narrow attack frontage of the Ardennes can be assessed from the galaxy of high calibre
officers who held command in this sector. Led by Colonel General Rundstedt they
included Generals Guderian, Kleist, Reinhardt,
Hoth and Rommel.
The attack, which began on May 10,
1940, had achieved most of its goals
by the 27th by which day the British had begun evacuating their forces from Dunkirk. The German army
in little more than two weeks had more or less defeated France,
a major world power at the time.
In comparison, in the First World War despite their super human
efforts, the Germans could not take Paris, ending that mighty battle in a bloody and muddy
stalemate after four years of fighting.
Having defeated France
Hitler was the master of mainland Europe. He
had to now decide on invading Britain
or to go East to settle the issue with the despised Slavic nation of Russia
once and for all. After a half hearted effort at subduing the proud island
across the narrow English Channel he turned
East, irrevocably, starting the epic struggle that was to determine
the fate of the Third Reich.
A F Sameer
01 June, 2008
30.Jun.2007: JonBenet Ramsey – A Heartbreaking Tragedy.
A review on The Death of Innocence: The Untold Story of
JonBenet’s
Murder and How its Exploitation Compromised the Pursuit of
Truth by
John and Patsy Ramsey (U.S., Thomas Nelson,
Inc., Mar-2000. ISBN 0-7852-6816-2:
Hardcover 396pp) [Daily News, p-23 (Book Reviews)].
http://www.dailynews.lk/2007/06/30/fea07.asp
JonBenet Ramsey - a heartbreaking
tragedy
The Death of
Innocence: The Untold Story of JonBenet’s Murder and How its Exploitation
Compromised the Pursuit of Truth
Authors: John and
Patsy Ramsey
(U.S.,
Thomas Nelson, Inc., Mar-2000)
Review: Firoze SAMEER
CRIME:
The hardcover decidedly serves as a strong panacea to parents who have lost a
sibling by murder.
Two murders of
children, committed specially during
Christmas in the last two decades,
are worthy of note: Dec-26, 1996, a cause celebre in the U.S. Six-year old beaut, JonBenet Ramsey,
in her home in Boulder, Colorado.
Dec-24, 1986. Eleven-year old Ryan
Emerson Pereira in a backwater called Kandana in Greater Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Sustained
investigations by the Boulder Police Department (BPD),
FBI, the DA’s office, and top-flight private investigators (PLs) are
still in progress in the first instance. The Sri Lanka Police Department, CDB,
CID or the AG’s department doesn’t demonstrably appear to have pursued on the
killer in the latter.
JonBenet hailed from
the developed U.S. Born to an upper class family; her father, John,
was CEO of Access Graphics, a
computer software company churning a turnover of some US$ 1- billion.
yan came from
developing Sri Lanka.
Born to a lower middle-brow Eurasian family whose breadwinner, Brian,
was a retired RCyAF officer allegedly receiving a modest pension.
JonBenet was known
publicly, participating at pageants, two of them being national events. Ryan had no
opportunity to achieve such fame. But they shared a common denominator: They
were, amongst many similar cases, two innocent children done to death.
Ryan
Dec-24, 1986,
2000-Hrs: Ryan, known affectionately
as Gilly Boy, born Aug-14, 1975,
was afflicted with nasal fibroid. Doctors attempted on more than one occasion
to operate but were forced to suspend surgery owing to the boy turning blue.
Son of Brian and Anne
Pereira, Ryan belonged to a Burgher
family of 3-boys and 3-girls. Ryan reportedly left that night with his eldest
brother Dexter Fabian from his aunt’s home in Hendala,
and travelled by bus.
e disembarked at
Kandana junction, while Dexter
continued toward Negombo to attend a shindig. Ryan had Rs. 150 loose change in
his pocket, carried some cake, a Moulinex grinder,
bonbons and some other little stuff to his 3-bedroom home owned by his parents.
n Christmas Day, they found his body partly hidden in a gunny bag
under a culvert between Kandana and Ragama railway stations.
Probably the killer
had clamped Gilly Boy’s mouth to prevent a scream,
thereby suffocating the boy.
he now defunct weekend
once featured this crime which remains unsolved todate,
in spite of an allegedly malicious neighbour suspiciously decamping shortly
after the crime. There was hardly a whimper in Sri Lanka.
Dec-25, 1996,
2200 Hrs: Christmas night: The unknown subject or UNSUB in FBI parlance, crept in to the 15-bedroom Tudor-style home of
John and Patsy Ramsey in Boulder
Colorado,
while the Ramsey family was dining at the Whites’ in the neighbourhood.
he UNSUB came equipped
with a Taser brand stun gun, black
duct tape and cord, and wrote a
3-page ransom note using Patsy’s notepad paper and a black felt-tipped marking
pen available in the house.
The Ramseys with
children Burke, 9, JonBenet,
6, returned home about 10-pm and
went to bed. The evil deed was perpetrated thenceforth until 5.52-am at which
time a BPD dispatcher received a 911 emergency call by a frantic Patricia Ann
Ramsey who found her daughter missing.
JonBenet, born Aug-06,
1990, was professionally garroted
with cord and a broken paint-brush handle belonging to Patsy. Her mouth was
duct-taped, her hands ligatured with
slip-knots, and the right side of
her skull showed an 8-inch fracture in an overkill.
er body, found in the basement,
showed two distinctive red spots 3 1/2-centimetres apart suggesting the use of
a stun gun.
he postmortem revealed
the cause of death as asphyxia by strangulation associated with craniocerebral
trauma. The murder shook America.
FBI, BPD and the DA
From the very outset, the ill-equipped BPD,
misdirected its line of action in suspecting one or both parents. Linda Arndt, the first officer to arrive at the crime scene, suspected John Ramsey while detective Steve
Thomas’s suspicions fell on Patsy.
At BPD, the lead investigator,
the commander of the detective division,
the department chief, and Steve
Thomas heading the investigations,
all reportedly had hardly any or no homicide experience,
while the lead investigator and Thomas had been detectives for no more than a
year.
homas’s book, Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, (Apr-2000) feebly attempts to point a finger at
Patsy, who with John effectively
challenged him at the Larry King live show on May-31,
2000. Also, Boulder County District
Attorney’s Office DA Alex Hunter and the BPD were continually at loggerheads.
BPD refused help from
the Denver
police department which investigates some 100 murders a year as against BPD’s
one or two.
PD also failed to
request the varied services of the FBI in the early stages of the crime, making a significant difference in the
investigation.
f the 18,000 police jurisdictions in the U.S. many were expected to be
similar to BPD with limited experience and knowledge in having to solve such
horrendous crimes.
Lou Smit
Mary Keenan-Lacy
succeeded Hunter as DA in 2002,
resulting in a recall of homicide detective Lou Smit “to find the truth about
JonBenet’s death,” but Lou expects
the BPD to make a breakthrough. Lou,
now 67, has an ongoing website
Lousmit.com. He keeps a picture of JonBenet in his wallet.
The DA’s office hired
Lou in mid-March 1997. Called out of retirement from the El Paso County
Sheriff’s Dept, Lou had solved 90%
of some 200 homicides he investigated during his 32-year career. Detectives
Ollie Gray and John San Augustin assist him since 1999.
Lou cracked the case
of Heather Dawn Church, a little
girl who had been murdered in Colorado
Springs,
after it lay dormant for 4-years!
Smit’s famous letter
of resignation to Hunter on Sep-20,
1998 ended with the statement,
“Shoes, shoes,
the victim’s shoes, who will stand
in the victim’s shoes....” Lou had determined that the parents were not guilty.
Ex-FBI sleuth John Douglas would state after meeting Lou,
“I would hate to have that guy on my tail if I was a bad guy.”
John
Douglas
Hired by John Ramsey’s
attorneys in early Jan-1997 to investigate the murder,
John Douglas (Mind hunter.com) had worked on over 5,000
homicide cases including some of the most heinous murders.
e profile the
Unabomber years before he was captured,
as well as predicted Atlanta’s
serial child murderer before Wayne Williams was caught and convicted.
Douglas, 25-years in the FBI, retired 1995,
inspired author Thomas Harris’s Special Agent Jack Crawford in his Hannibal
Lecter novels. Silence of the Lambs director Jonathan Demme described him as
“...a brilliant man.... (who) knows more about serial killers than anybody in
the word.”
Douglas holds a doctorate in
psychology. Author of several books on real life crime,
Douglas co-authored The Cases that Haunt Us, and concludes the parents were not guilty
vis-a-vis contrary views of the tabloid media and public.
e described the UNSUB
as someone known to the Ramseys, a
person who had been in their house and who had a personal grudge against John, and that the murderer remains a “certain breed of
cat, a high-risk type of offender.”
Ramsey
Family
John Ramsey’s daughter
Elizabeth or Beth, 22, by his first marriage to Cindy, while being driven by her friend Matt on Jan-8, 1992,
was broadsided by a truck, killing
Matt on the spot and Beth at the Loyola Medical Center to which she was
airlifted.
hat was the first
trauma of the Ramsey family. Almost a lustrum later,
JonBenet’s murder irrevocably broke their spirit.
A grand jury which sat
on this case from mid-Sep-1998 for over a year,
pondering on some of the 30,000-pages
of data from the case files, and
reportedly heard many witnesses,
eventually did not file charges.
A onetime Miss West Virginia and journalism major a West Virginia University, Patsy,
49, had Stage-IV ovarian cancer. She
passed on June-24, 2006, and was buried beside her baby, JonBenet,
and Beth at St James Cemetery in Atlanta.
Gilly Boy’s dad, Brian,
was afflicted with diabetes and walked with an artificial foot, continually pinning for his son. A six-foot
strapper, he died some years ago, and was buried beside his boy at Kapuwatte General Cemetery
in Rilaulla, Kandana.
John and Patsy’s
message for the killer is: “Patsy and I and our families want you to know that
we will be after you until we find you. The pursuit will not stop. Every
morning when you wake up, you will
know that this may be your last day of freedom. Beware.
he person who looks at
you strangely, or who seems to be
following you, could be your captor.
Eventually you will be identified. Trust us. It will happen.” Ramseyfamily.com
and a tip line solicit help from the public.
DNA
School teacher John
Michael Karr’s confession, arrest
and flight from Bangkok to the U.S. in Aug-2006 fell flat.
His DNA didn’t match
with those found in JonBent’s underwear and fingernails. Karr’s extensive email
correspondence with Colorado
University journalism professor, Michael Tracy,
had evoked strong suspicion.
n one we see a US$ 100,000 reward backed by a slew of investigating
authorities amidst high technology forensics,
fingerprinting, profiling, DNA,
polygraph testing, extensive website
analyses, pursuing every lead upto
date. The other was hardly heard of,
probably its file closed and stashed in some place forgotten!.
firozesameer@gmail.com
|
SIR CHRISTOPHER ONDAATJE REVIEWS RAVINDRA FERNANDO’S BOOK A MURDER
IN CEYLON
|
|

|
|
|
|
Picture shows
the strangled body of Mrs. Sathasivam
By Sir Christopher Ondaatje
Special to: The Sri Lankan ANCHORMAN
Mahadeva
Sathasivam was certainly one of the finest cricketers ever produced by the island of Ceylon. Educated at Wesley College, he produced many brilliant innings for the
school including a magnificent 145 against St. Thomas’ College in 1936. He was a
stylish right-handed batsman who could cut,
drive and pull with extreme power,
and his late cut was his most revered stroke.
He captained the Tamil Union Cricket and Athletic Club,
and first played for Ceylon
in 1945 scoring 111 runs against India. He scored 215 at the
Madras Cricket Club and later captained Ceylon
against Australia
in 1948. He was a batting genius and Frank Worrell,
the West Indian Captain, said that
the very first batsman he would pick for a World XI would be “Sathasivam from
Ceylon”.
|
|
|
|
Sathasivam
married Miss Anandan Rajendra on the 9th February 1940. Miss Rajindra had two
valuable properties, as well as
jewellery, as part of her dowry
and the Tamil couple eventually had four daughters. In 1949, one of Mrs Sathasivam’s properties was sold and
a house called “Jayamangalam” was purchased at No.7,
St. Alban’s Place in Bambalapitiya. It was a troubled marriage and the
following year Sathasivam became involved with an attractive young lady, Yvonne Stevenson,
born to a Dutch mother and a Polish father. The couple separated and appeared
headed for divorce.
On 9th October 1951, a hot humid
day in Colombo, shortly after 3.00 p.m.,
Mrs Sathasivam was found strangled and dead by a Meegoda laundryman on the
floor of a garage, face upwards
with a wooden mortar placed on her neck. Her two young daughters were playing
downstairs in the adjoining house. A next door neighbour, Mrs Foenander,
was called and the Bambalapitiya police informed of the crime. By 3.23 p.m. 7
St. Alban’s Place was under police guard and an angry crowd had gathered
outside the front door. A short while later Mahadeva Sathasivam, who had stayed at his wife’s house on the night
of 8th October but had left early on the next morning,
was arrested at a friend’s house. A 19 year old servant boy, Hewa Marambage William,
who also lived at the house, was
found to be missing.
After an extended search, the
servant boy William was found ten days later in the village of Kalametiya
near Hungama in the Tangalle district where he was taken to the Matara Police
Station for questioning about the murder as well as about certain articles -
precious stones from a ring and a gold bar or “Thalikody” - which had been
stolen from Mrs Sathasivam’s neck and later sold. It was also noted that
there were eight injuries on William’s face,
arm and hand. William was remanded.
Magisterial inquiry
The law of Ceylon
determined that a magisterial inquiry had to held on the murder of Mrs
Sathasivam, before trial in a
higher court. The inquiry began on 2nd November 1951 and ended on 16th
October 1952 when both Sathasivam and William were committed to the Supreme
Court for trial.
Then, curiously, on 16th October 1952,
over a year after the death of Mrs Sathasivam,
a warrant of pardon for William was received from the Attorney-General “on condition
that William making a full and true disclosure of the whole of the
circumstances within his knowledge of the murder and abetment of a murder and
relative to every other person concerned,
whether as principal or abettor in the commissioning of the said offence”. He
was then released as a suspect but retained in police custody until the
termination of the trial.
Professor
Ravindra Fernando, in his gripping
account of the sensational Sathasivam case over half a century ago A Murder
in Ceylon
gives a detailed account of the Supreme Court trial that started on 20th
March 1953, almost a whole year
after the magisterial inquiry,
before Justice E.F.N. Gratiaen.
Sathasivam alone was charged with the murder of his wife under Section 296 of
the Ceylon Penal Code. He entered a plea of “Not Guilty”.
The second accused in the Magistrates’ Court,
William, who was given a
conditional pardon by the Attorney-General,
became the chief witness for the prosecution. Professor Fernando’s book makes
for fascinating reading, and takes
the reader through an extraordinary trial where circumstantial evidence
pointed strongly at the accused Sathasivam,
someone known for his drinking and womanising,
to have murdered his wife.
Two or three different confessions from the servant William, including a statement that he had assisted
Sathasivam in the murder of his wife,
added to the confusion of the case. The actual time of the murder became an
important issue, Sathasivam
maintained that he left No. 7, St.
Alban’s Place, at 10.30 a.m., and at that time his wife was alive and healthy.
He admitted that he had stayed in his wife’s bedroom on the previous night
and indeed had sexual intercourse with her the following morning before
leaving in a summed Quickshaws cab.
Manually strangling her
The Crown
however accused Sathasivam of (a) manually strangling her, first lulling her into a sense of false security
by having sex with her; (b) stamping on her neck with a shod foot after the
strangulation; (c) planning the murder in order to throw suspicion on the
servant boy; (d) with cynical regard for Hindu custom,
remove her “Thalikody” which he had placed around her neck on her wedding day
when that neck was the neck of a corpse; (e) removing other articles of
jewellery from her dead body; (f) give money and the removed articles of
jewellery to the servant William as a reward for assisting with the murder;
and that (g) he had proceeded to make the case against William doubly certain
by daubing the corpse’s feet with kitchen dirt because William’s legitimate
activities were confined to the kitchen. A motive for murder was also
suggested where the unemployed Sathasivam,
with no income except a small allowance from his mother,
was faced with the burden of alimony in any expected divorce ruling, and to be denied any further access to his
wife’s property or fortune.
A
bitter legal battle between the eminent counsel T.S. Fernando for the Crown
and Dr. Colvin R. de Silva for the defence then ensued in Court. Suspense and
suspicion gripped the entire island
of Ceylon.
The Inspector General of Police,
police officers, scientists, the general public,
as well as the medical experts,
including the first Professor of Forensic Medicine,
two eminent Professors of Surgery at the University of Ceylon, and the world acclaimed Professor Sydney Smith
of the University of Edinburgh,
had varying and conflicting opinions on the murder case.
Then, following a 57-day trial, Justice Gratiaen gave a long, detailed and excellent scientific analysis of
the evidence. Professor Ravindra Fernando leaves none of the gruesome details
out in his book which examines and presents the facts and expert evidence in
this landmark case in the history of law and forensic medicine in Sri Lanka.
It is no secret that after questioning the credibility of the wrongly
pardoned William’s testimony and severely criticising the conduct of the
Ceylon Police, that Justice
Gratiaen correctly directed the jury which then deliberated for 64 minutes
before bringing back an unanimous verdict of “Not Guilty”.
Mahadeva
Sathasivam then walked out of the dock a free man,
after spending twenty months in the remand prisons for a crime he did not
commit. Three prosecution witnesses were sentenced to two months rigorous
imprisonment for giving “palpably false evidence on a matter of vital
importance affecting the guilt or otherwise of the accused”, and one prosecution witness was discharged with
a severe warning.
Amazingly
William, having been granted a
pardon by the Attorney General before the case,
also walked free after the trial. He is the only person alive today who was a
first hand witness to what happened at No. 7,
St Alban’s Place on that fateful day in October 1951. He lives in the village of Angunabadulla in the Thihagoda area
eight miles from Matara.
Vijitha Yapa Publications, Sri Lanka
- Rs. 890
|
27.Aug.2006: The Other Side
of the Sathasivam Case.
A review on A Murder in Ceylon by Prof. Ravindra
Fernando,
MBBS,
MD, FCCP,
FCGP, FRCP(Lond), FRCP(Glasgow),
FRCP(Edin.), FRCPath(UK), DMJ(Lond).
Senior Professor of
Forensic Medicine and Toxicology,
Faculty of Medicine,
University of Colombo. (Colombo,
Vijitha Yapa Publications,
June-2006:
ISBN 955-1266-20-X: First Edition, Hardcover 480pp). [The Sunday Times,
p-4 (Books)]
http://sundaytimes.lk/060827/index.html
The other side of the Sathasivam
case
A Murder In Ceylon:
The Sathasivam Case by Prof. Ravindra Fernando. Vijitha Yapa Publications.
Reviewed by Firoze Sameer
Crime
The case revolved around three major factors: the identity of the murderer, the location of the crime,
and the time at which Mrs. Anandan Sathasivam was killed.
Author
Prof. Ravindra Fernando deserves to be commended on this 480-page account –
touching on the medical aspects and leaning toward the defence – in giving us
the intricacies involved in this celebrated case of 1952.
Parallel contrary views
Sir Sydney Smith's account under the same title in his book Mostly Murder (1959, Harrap Ltd,
GB) is upheld by Prof. Fernando. However,
readers should study former Supreme Court Judge A. C. Alles's version in his
Famous Criminal Cases of Sri Lanka Vol. 4 to have a balanced view of what
really happened on that fateful day at No. 7,
St. Alban's Place in Bambalapitiya,
on October 9, 1951.
Confusing the jury
In some celebrated murder cases, a
common streak is clearly discerned in the line of conflicting evidence by
expert witnesses, running into
several thousands of pages, led by
eminent defence counsel in examination/cross-examination vis-à-vis the clear
evidence at hand. The resultant effect confuses and confounds the seven lay
jurors comprising average folk,
leading them to unanimously acquit the accused! In such cases an erudite
three-judge bench would have determined otherwise as witnessed in the Mathew
Peiris, Rita John and Hokandara
trials, all leading to convictions.
Ranjani taxi-cab
murder
The Ranjani taxi-cab murder case in September–December 1954, showed this kind of clever strategy adopted by G.
G. Ponnambalam, QC, and Sir Ukwatte Jayasundera,
KCMG, KBE,
JP, QC,
in their cross-examination of three topflight fingerprint experts. Alles states
that “a large part of the cross-examination was confined to minor
contradictions, irrelevancies and
fanciful improbabilities, which were
bound to affect the lay jury and confuse them in regard to the salient features
of the crown case”. Trial proceedings of 3,500
pages comprised cross-examination of the finger prints and ballistics experts
testimony topping 1,170 pages! The
jury's unanimous verdict saw all four accused being acquitted.
Ceylon: Turf Club
robbery and murder
The Ceylon Turf Club robbery and murder case in January 1950: two belated
witnesses, one saw the 4th accused
Aratchirala at Punchi Borella; the other saw him travelling in the car Z6033
along Havelock Road
at almost the same time 8.30 a.m. on 31.01.49. Crown witness Rupananda's statement
that the arrangement was for Z6033 to be at Darley road/McCallum road junction
at 8.00 a.m. added to the confusion,
while proctor Somaweera Gunasekera testified that Aratchirala met him at
Hulftsdorp at 9.30 a.m. Aratchirala and his henchman Madaviya were, at the early stages of this case, discharged,
while four accused went to the gallows.
Chandrasekera
Dias murder:
Called by the defence, Professor of
Forensic Medicine at Peradeniya
University, Dr. Chandra Amerasekere,
vehemently contradicted AJMO Dr. J. G. Gunaselvam,
a lecturer in Forensic Medicine,
whose excellent job in conducting the autopsy established beyond reasonable
doubt that Chandrasekera Dias was the victim of homicide and not suicide.
Cross-examined by the defence for almost nine days to shake his
testimony to throw doubts on the time of death,
they could not shake his evidence on the cause of death as a result of
homicidal strangulation. The seven-member Sinhala-speaking jury's unanimous
verdict saw Mrs. Rohini Dias and chauffeur Nimal Fonseka being acquitted on
04.09.82.
Sathasivam
murder case:
Similarly, in the Sathasivam murder
case, the jury appears to have been
thoroughly confused, especially with
the conflicting medical evidence,
and should have seriously considered the following facts:
Hostile witness
1. IGP Sir Richard Aluvihare,
KCMG, breaks protocol, requesting Prof. G. S. W. de Saram, Professor of Forensic Medicine of Peradeniya
University, to conduct the autopsy
over the JMO, Dr. P. S. Gunawardene.
2. Prof. de Saram's dogged stance insisting on conducting the
autopsy by himself sans assistance from the JMO portrays a psyche of blatant
infallibility (p137).
3. Re: Time of death – his postmortem report states 10.00/11.30
a.m. and, after conducting
experiments on executed prisoners on Sir Sydney Smith's advice, changes it to 11/11.15/11.30 a.m. in and not
earlier than 10.45 a.m.! (p169).
4. This stance stood diametrically against the
temperature/alimentary tests conducted by Professors Paul and Peiris, and tests by the radiologist Dr. A. H. N. Welikala
indicating 9.30 a.m. keeping with William's story.
5. Prof. de Saram's aversion from pronouncing executed prisoners
dead, revealed his stance against
capital punishment.
Prof. G. S. W. de Saram,
called as a prosecution witness, at
the very outset turns a hostile witness.
OP Mack
1. Sathasivam's voluntary statement made on 31.03.52 at the
magisterial inquiry held by N. M. J. Rajendram,
indicates thus (p280-281): Mr. Sathasivam said that he then had sexual
intercourse with his wife (on the 9th morning).
“After my bath I came out of my bedroom. While I was rubbing
myself down I remember my wife telling me,
‘Summons has also been served and I do not know what I could tell Mr. Mack if I
conceived’.”
2. OP Mack acting for Mrs. Sathasivam in the divorce case states
that some time between 10.30 a.m. and 12 noon on the 9th he received a call
from a lady who asked him whether summons had been served in the divorce case.
Although she did not give her name,
he presumed it to be the voice of Mrs. Sathasivasm. However, he entertained some doubts later.
But then we all know from Sathasivam's very statement that Mrs.
Sathasivam already knew that summons had been served on Sathasivam on the 8th
(p17). Why would she query Mack again?
William
1. A villager,18 years, just 11-days in service in the Sathasivam
household, bereft of any education
or imagination, tells a long story, ball by ball in cricket parlance, on how the master threatened him and made him an
accessory to a murder, and all the
attendant actions of going about it,
from the bedroom via the pantry,
right through the kitchen and to the garage,
and later being given a part of the jewellery. This is unimaginable for such a
villager to concoct.
2. The controversial abrasion on the victim's back could easily
have been caused while the body was being carried via that narrow 17-inch
passage between the pantry and garage.
3. The drag mark on the kitchen could very well have been one of
the victim's feet being dragged along that same passage,
thereby causing blackening of that foot. The victim could even have stained her
feet by walking about the kitchen before she was murdered.
4. The victim's head injury,
as opined by the defence, was the
cause of William hitting her with a piece of firewood,
followed by strangling her, is
rather far fetched. He could have continued to hit her with that piece of
firewood, better still that blowpipe, and done his foul deed.
5. That William attacked Mrs. Sathasivam from behind vis-à-vis she
having approached him from the pantry to the kitchen while facing him, when that “protrusion” allegedly causing the
abrasion between her shoulders, was
at the point of the narrow passage leading to the garage far behind William.
Also, if he had approached her from
behind, how come he received those
scrape marks?
6. The dead body had husk scrapings,
not coconut scrapings, on the neck
region. Evidently, the body was
lying close to a whole heap of coconut husks. William was scraping a coconut at
that time.
William's confession at an early stage to the murder was a
strongpoint with the defence, but
then his motive of robbery was flawed,
since there was enough wealth in the house he didn't steal.
Sir Sydney
Smith, CBE
Prof. Sydney Smith was successfully challenged in the Sidney Fox murder case by
Sir Bernard Spilsbury, where the
jury accepted Sir Spilsbury's evidence and found the accused guilty of murder
by strangulation, rejecting the
opinion of Prof. Sydney Smith that death had resulted from heart failure, due to suffocation induced by excessive smoke and
a weak heart.
Alles states that “in both cases,
that of Sydney Fox and Sathasivam,
Sir Sydney Smith appears to have displayed a weakness of too readily supporting
his medical opinions by an acceptance of non-medical facts, on which a forensic expert is not competent to
express an expert opinion.”
Quickshaws
1. William's evidence on leaving the residence about 09.30 a.m.
and meeting with V. S. N. Shanmugam was established at the trial.
2. Quickshaws driver Pabilis's log sheet shows he left Majestic
cinema in Bambalapitiya in response to Shanmugam's call at 9 a.m. for High
Street, and according to both
Pabilis and Shanmugam, they both
travelled together in the taxi from 9.45 a.m. to 11 a.m. that morning. The log
sheet strangely showed an ‘erasure’ after the numeral nine, for which he could not give a satisfactory
explanation.
3. Quickshaws driver M. L. A. Perera picked Sathasivam at 10.30
a.m. at his home, and after having
driven down the lane, turned the
vehicle, and while travelling
towards Galle Road
glanced at the Sathasivam household and at the entrance saw Mrs. Sathasivam.
This was a time divorce action was filed against her husband, and here she was at the door to send her husband
off!
4. Quickshaws manager,
Allen Mendis's evidence that Mrs. Sathasivam called just before 10.30 a.m.
notwithstanding the log sheet entry stating ‘Sathasivam’.
Obviously some sinister hand at Quickshaws was tampering with
evidence, detrimental to the
interests of Sathasivam.
Conflicting evidence
The damning evidence of simple people who gave details of time, action,
and events absolutely ignorant about the implications their evidence will
relate to the time of the crime vis-à-vis the so-called experts, who were stubbornly insisting on various times and
happenings, using their tenuous and
conflicting medical expertise and experiments to substantiate their position, being cognizant their evidence will either save or
send Sathasivam to the gallows.
Professors Paul and Peiris's evidence conflicted with Professors
de Saram and Sydney Smith, obviously
casting doubts in the minds of the lay jury,
let alone the eminent judge's direction to the jury,
which appeared to lean more in favour of Sathasivam. A hard-fought attempt was
on the cards to save Sathasivam from the gibbet,
since William too had turned crown witness,
and at the end of the day, nobody
was going to be hanged. The verdict of the unsequestered (as opposed to the OJ
Simpson case) jury to acquit unanimously.
Points to ponder
1. Sathasivam was a prominent and popular all-Ceylon cricketer
vis-à-vis William, a nonentity.
2. The eminent trial judge E. F. N. Gratiaen (later CBE,
QC) was a sportsman himself.
3. The English-speaking jury,
comprised folks favouring Sathasivam's prowess at cricket.
4. Colvin R. de Silva's inimitable charisma over solicitor-general
T. S. Fernando (later CBE, QC)
swayed the jury.
5. Conflicting medical evidence amongst experts vis-à-vis that of
ordinary folk.
6. Sinister and powerful hands working behind the lines in favour
of Sathasivam.
7. Affluent friends like M. M. Haniffa allegedly doling out funds.
8. Some support for Sathasivam from a section in the police
department.
All these aspects favoured Sathasivam,
who had a strong motive to kill his wife after divorce action had been filed on
the 8th – which was obviously going to succeed against his interests – and he
stood to lose all, including his
lover Yvonne Stevenson, whom he
wouldn't have been able to support,
let alone pay alimony to his wife. His last try for reconciliation on the 9th
morning appears to have failed.
Editing
Some editorial drawbacks: Quotes carry closed inverted commas at the end of
every paragraph, instead of only the
last one. The inevitable “different to” provokes a riposte of “similar from”!
Overkill of exclamation marks. All in all,
Prof. Fernando has made a significant contribution in recounting the in-depth
medical ramifications of this diabolical crime.
Refer:
(1) 29.July.2006: Expert Testimony in Sensational Murder Case
Analysed:
A review by CR de Silva,
PC, Solicitor General (Attorney General since
07.04.07).
(Daily News: p-12) http://www.dailynews.lk/2006/07/29/fea10.asp
Expert
testimony in sensational murder case analysed
Review:
C. R. de Silva Solicitor General
A murder in Ceylon
The Sathasivam Case
Author:
Ravindra Fernando
Vijitha
Yapa Publications
CRIME:
Prof. Ravindra Fernando's book 'A murder in Ceylon' covers in great detail the
famous Sathasivam murder case, which
evoked much public interest in this country. Prof. Ravindra Fernando, needs no introduction in the field of Forensic
Medicine.
He
has been one of our leading Forensic Pathologists for a considerable period of
time. Apart from the field of Forensic Medicine,
Prof. Fernando has interested himself in various other disciplines such as
Human Rights and Politics.
Prof. Fernando in his book has
analyzed in great detail all evidentiary aspects relating to expert testimony
as well as the evidence of lay witness of fact.
He has spared no pains in
conducting a very comprehensive research on the numerous aspects of this case
which includes forensic medicine,
law and also the rules governing evaluation of credibility of witnesses.
Legal principles
As for me,
although I have quoted the judgement of Regina V. Sathasivam on innumerable
occasions in court, I have not been
conversant with the various factual aspects behind the numerous legal
principles that arose for consideration in the course of this trial. The reason
being the absence of any publication which dealt exhaustively with the factual
aspects of this case.
In this regard, I am personally indebted to Prof. Fernando, for giving me an opportunity to educate myself, on the numerous evidentiary and legal aspects that
came up for consideration during the trial.
The author in his characteristic
readable style, has dwelt very
clearly and lucidly into the evidence as well as the arguments which came up at
the trial.
I think I would not be doing
justice to the great work of Prof. Fernando,
unless I briefly refer to some of the important factual and legal aspects, that went before the jury.
Sordid murder
The accused in this case was a
household name in the field of cricket and he was arranged for having murdered
his wife on October 9, 1951.
The principal witness was one
William, a young servant boy
employed by the deceased. William,
who was an accomplice in this sordid murder,
was granted a conditional pardon by the Attorney General.
According to the prosecution the
murder had taken place around 9.30 a.m. before the very eyes of William. In his
narration of events that took place on the fateful day he had been in the
kitchen preparing the mid-day meal,
when the accused had come there and sought his assistance to murder his wife.
William stated that the accused
had told him that his wife had filed a case for divorce against him and he had
further stated that her case would,
in all probability, be decided in
her favour and therefore it was necessary to murder her.
The prosecution alleges that this
was the motive for the killing. The accused had promised William some gold
jewellery worth three to four hundred rupees for his services.
Feeble attempt
According to William the accused
had taken him to the master bed room wherein they found the deceased seated on
the bed. Thereupon the accused had gone up to the deceased, pulled her down to the floor and strangled her
with his bare hands.
William had helped the accused by
holding the deceased in the region of her hips and in the process the deceased
had made a feeble attempt to grab William. As a result,
William suffered a few abrasions on his face and the right forearm.
At one stage,
according to William, the accused
had got up and trampled her throat. Thereafter the accused had removed the
Thali, a gold bangle and a ring the
deceased was wearing and given it to William.
William then described how he
assisted the accused to carry the dead body to the garage through the kitchen.
After the body was dumped in the garage William had made his escape to his home
town in the deep south having sold the jewellery at Wellawatta and Panadura.
William categorically states that
the murder had taken place at 9.30 in the morning. It transpired that the
accused had left his marital home in a taxi which he had ordered from
Quickshaws around 10.30 a.m.
The accused took up the position
that when he left the house at 10.30 a.m. he was seen off by the deceased and
it was the position of the defence that the murder had taken place after 10.30
a.m.
The time of death in this case
played a crucial role in the determination of the guilt or innocence of the
accused. Prof. G. S. W. de Saram took up the position that the death had
occurred between 11.15-11.45 a.m. That is admittedly after the accused had left
the house.
The opinion of Prof. de Saram was
supported by Prof. Sydney Smith who was called by the defence. On the other
hand Prof. Milroy Paul and Prof. M.V.P. Pieris disagreed with both Prof. De
Saram and Sir Sydney Smith.
Prof. Ravindra Fernando has
itemized the medical evidence of these medical experts regarding the methods
employed by them relating to the estimation of the time of death.
I would think that the expert
evidence narrated by Prof. Fernando from pages 136 to 270 provide ample
material for any lawyer to effectively deal with medical evidence, in a case where the time of death becomes
relevant. On behalf of the legal fraternity of this country I must thank Prof.
Fernando for educating us on this important aspect of forensic medicine.
Abrasions
Another aspect of this case
highlighted by the author was the presence of two abrasions on the back of the
deceased between the two shoulder blades.
It would be interesting to note
that Sir Sydney Smith having arrived in Ceylon had on his way to the hotel, visited the scene of the crime and he had observed
a protruding metal clasp by the kitchen door.
This metal clasp was situated at a
height of 3 and half feet from the floor. He went on to state that those
injuries between the shoulder blades had been caused as a result of the
deceased being pressed against the surface upon which the metal clasp was
fixed.
This evidence necessarily shifted
the place of offence to the kitchen and completely contradicted William's
evidence that the murder took place in the bedroom upstairs. This was another
aspect of medical evidence which militated against the guilt of the accused
Sathasivam.
I would refer to another
interesting aspect that necessarily caused a serious doubt about the truth of
William's version of the crime. Prof,
G.S.W. De Saram had found some dark fluffy material on the soles of the deceased.
This tallied with the floor
scrapings taken from the kitchen floor. This evidence created a further doubt
about the veracity of the testimony of William,
that the murder took place in the bed-room.
These aspects of expert evidence
have to be viewed in the light of the position taken up by William in his
statement made soon after his arrest at the Matara Police Station where he
admitted that he had strangled the deceased when she came into the kitchen
while he was scraping coconuts for the preparation of the midday meal.
This position is further confirmed
by the discovery of "fragments of fine black powder" by Prof. De
Saram in a depressed abrasion found in the lower Jaw.
The Govt. Analyst opined that this
powder was coconut fluff. If the murder took place in the bedroom there would
have been no way that coconut fluff would have been found on the deceased.
This would be additional material
which clearly points to the murder being committed in the kitchen and would
also support the theory advanced by the defence that Willian had strangled the
deceased in the kitchen when the latter had come there while William was
scraping coconuts.
The items of expert evidence I
have discussed were undoubtedly of great importance in the final outcome in
this case.
Finally,
may I say that had I been a member of the jury I would have without much
hesitation come to the same conclusion that the seven members of the jury came
to in this celebrated case.
24.Nov.2004: Mohanraj sustains music tradition: Apsaras moves
into third decade.
(Daily News: Art Scope:
p-viii). http://www.dailynews.lk/2004/11/24/artscop15.html
Apsaras
moves into third decade
Mohanraj sustains music tradition
by Firoze Sameer
Goddess of South Indian
playback singing, P Susheela, during her debut in Sri Lanka at the grand 4-hour
Nenjam Marappathillai show at the BMICH on 10.05.91,
declared on stage in clear Tamil,
"...He [Mohanraj] is
the cause for all this [show]. There is a computer inside him... Yes... He
should be cited in the Guinness Book of Records. You should all encourage him, and nominate him to get his name into the Guinness
Book. Because he plays all the notes. And I have never seen such talent before.
This is the first time I'm seeing such talent. A computer,
not even referring to a single notation. To play so is extremely difficult...
...I take great pride [in him]."
The encomiums APSARAS and
Mohanraj have publicly received over the years from the South Indian music
moguls Padmashree Dr KJ Jesudas,
Padmashree Dr SP Balasubramaniam,
Kalaimaamani TM Soundararajan and P Susheela are legion,
and bear ample testimony to the high quality of their many musical renditions.
|

|
|
Mohanraj (left), Muthuswamy master with baby Mohanraj (right)
|
APSARAS, the popular oriental music group moves into its
third decade toward year-end 2004.
Mohanraj, now pushing 42,
son of the renowned music director Muthuswamy Master,
has been the driving force behind which APSARAS has successfully steered ahead
through its periods of peaks and troughs,
thrilling diverse audiences at home and abroad,
in rendering light Sinhala, Tamil
and Hindi music, for almost thirty
years.
APSARAS has come a long way
in its splendid performances and achievements,
guided by its dynamic and precocious leader over its experienced members, and its sustained continuity of valuable and
varied contributions to the oriental music field from the 20st century into the
3rd millennium.
Muthuswamy
Master
What's special about the
group is that it was formed in 1975 followed by the blessings of that doyen of
oriental music, Muthuswamy Master, and it was led by his son,
Mohanraj, who has undoubtedly proved
himself a chip of the old block.
Muthuswamy Master's music
direction has seen a slew of South Indian singers under his baton. The local
music arena comprised of some fine vocalists who were backed by Muthuswamy
Master including the famed Dharmadasa and Lata Walpola (later Kalasuri), HR Jothipala,
Mohideen Baig (later Kalasuri), GSB
Rani, Sujatha Perera (now
Attanayake), Milton Perera, Narada Dissasekera,
Angeline Gunatilleka and others.
Notable were WD Amaradeva
(violin) (later Pundit), Premasiri
Khemadasa (flute) (later Dr), Sarath
Dassanayake (sitar), Victor
Ratnayake (violin), and Dharmadasa
Walpola (flute) all reading their respective instruments under Muthuswamy
Master's direction. The Master was also instrumental in Nanda Malini's entr,e to music in Dharuwaa Kaagedha in 1960.
Father
and son
Unlike Muthuswamy Master's
father, who encouraged his son to
play music, in the case of
Muthuswamy Master and his son,
Mohanraj, it was the reverse.
As in the case of the great
Viennese composer, Johann Strauss
the Elder, who initially discouraged
his son, Johann Strauss the Younger
(famous for The Blue Danube, and
other remarkable classics) to follow in his footsteps,
the Master vehemently opposed his son to the extent of debarring him from
touching his prized harmonium! However,
during the periods of the Master's absence when he used to visit the SLBC as
Leader of the Tamil orchestra, the
boy's Mom encouraged him to practice in secret!
Sometime in 1976-77, the memorable SweetNight musical show was staged
at the Kathiresan Hall in Bambalapitiya,
APSARAS being assisted by the popular bandmaster Latiff Miskin, a great friend of,
and musician for, Muthuswamy Master, joining in with his trumpet.
Mohanraj, born 27.09.62,
was billed to play on an upgraded version of his electric organ: the new Yamaha
YC-45. Muthuswamy Master and general secretary of the Ceylon Workers' Congress
(CWC), S
Sellasamy, were invited
as chief guests.
Sellasamy's presence at
this show was the result of the friendship Selladurai had with the Sri Lankan
drama artiste, VKT Balan (presently
operating an airline ticketing business in Chennai),
who was closely associated with Sellasamy during that period. Tickets were
priced at Rs 10, Rs 7 and Rs 5.
The SweetNight show was a
landmark event in Tamil music in Sri Lanka. Selladurai sang his
first song in public, En Devanei, which was originally sung by the famous South
Indian singer AM Rajah in the Tamil movie Veetu Maapilai.
Whether the Master had a
notion that his boy had been playing secretly behind his back is a moot-point, since,
even if he did so, he never showed
it. However, the Master was
pleasantly surprised and greatly impressed by his son's performance at this
musical show, which evoked amazing
audience response.
Perhaps, after attending this show,
the Master was probably convinced that his son had re-confirmed the established
theory of genes relating to characteristic inheritance.
Muthuswamy Master
thereafter blessed and guided his boy in music for over the decade that
followed. The vital in-depth training Mohanraj received from his father was
profound. Thus began the road to fame and success.
APSARAS, under the able guidance of Mohanraj, has made several musical tours to England and Western Europe, Singapore, and Norway, while Mohanraj has also toured South Africa,
Doha in Qatar, and also made recent visits to the UK and
to Sydney and Melbourne, Down Under.
Awards
Mohanraj has received the
Mellisai Mannan award on the same occasion when his father Muthuswamy Master
was awarded the Layagnaanavaarudhee by Regional Development Minister C
Rajadurai on 03.01.87, the Isaignaana
Ilavarasar award by the France Tamil Cultural Federation in Paris in 1991,
and the In-Isai Elavaarsar award under the auspices of President JR Jayewardene
on 30.12.90.
Mohanraj received the Isai
Maamanie award for which the South India movie
star 'Major' Sunderrarajan of the movie Major Chandrakanth fame arrived to make
the presentation on behalf of the All Ceylon Sabarimalai Saastha Peedam
sometime in 1993.
He also received a
Kala-Jothi certificate with Ponnaadai (silk shawl) by the Tamil Saagithya Vizha
(Festival) program from Hindu Cultural Affairs Minister PP Devaraj on 22.08.93, while in the same month Aacharya WD Amaradeva
donned a silk shawl on him for his brilliant backing in a rendition of twelve
Tamil folk songs sung by the eminent Visharadha Nanda Malini: the
audio-cassette Kunkuma Pottu was released thereafter.
The International
University of Martial Arts under the patronage of Prime Minister Sirimavo RD
Bandaranaike, conferred an honorary
doctorate on Mohanraj for his contribution to music on 30.04.97.
Mohanraj was also awarded
the Sudhanthira Pon Vizha Isai Virundhu award from the Indian entertainer, Leoni,
during Sri Lanka's
golden jubilee independence celebrations on 08.02.98.
He also received the Isai
Gnaani award from deputy minister of Estate Housing P Chandrasekeran on
20.06.99. Mohanraj also received the Asia Isai Thalapadhi award at the
Ameenkhan's Nite on 08.07.01 at the Tower Hall from former minister MH Mohamed, MP.
Audio-cassettes/CDs
The audio-cassette Innisai
Vaarpugal was released on Dheepavali Day 01.11.86 comprising of 10-Tamil songs
with original melodies composed by Mohanraj,
and recording was conducted under the supervision of that dynamic entertainer, BH Abdul Hameed,
who served as recording engineer in this instance.
It was a time when Ayaz
Zavahir, successor to Yaal Ramanan
who later qualified as an attorney-at-law,
was lead guitarist to the group,
while jazz-drummer Neville Silva's son,
Sarath, sat in for Benhur Fernando, on jazz-drums.
April-97 saw the release of
APSARAS's CD comprising of twelve top Tamil hit numbers titled Viludhu (Young
Tastes) sponsored by the Viludhugal dance troupe in France to celebrate an
annual event with famed South Indian vocalist,
Mano, featuring two hits. Ananda
Ramesh wrote the lyrics.
Ninaivugal comprising
15-Tamil hits, all new lyrics
written by ex-SLBC lyricist Kaarmegam Nanda,
now resident in Oslo, Norway, was released in early 2001.
The image of APSARAS and
the high respect it commands over Sri Lankans all over the globe, and especially at home,
has continued to flourish and grow with the passage of time.
This success is mainly due
to its tunesmith and talented leader,
Mohanraj, a literal prodigy behind
his four-tiered keyboards, and his
knack in contributing to the group as a vocalist.
Mohanraj's ability to
render Sinhala, Tamil and Hindi
numbers with ease springs from the vital advantage of having a parentage mix of
Tamil in his famed father and Sinhala in his mother,
Neeliya, who hails from a known
Sinhala family connected to music in Kandy.
Mohanraj's erstwhile
renditions of old-time Tamil songs brought him much deserved prominence and
popularity amongst his Tamil fans at home and abroad.
His revival of some of his
father's old Sinhala songs, with
slight modifications to suit the new generation,
has expanded his popularity significantly amongst the Sinhala people. The
revival of the popular piece Madhura Yaame was one such landmark, and has thrilled the Sinhala audience in no
uncertain terms.
Such response was witnessed
especially at the Madhura Yaame show held in honour of the 10th death
anniversary of Muthuswamy Master on 27.06.98. Amongst the many speakers at this
show, notable was the splendid
speech delivered by the North-Eastern province governor,
the late Kalasuri Dr Gamini Fonseka.
A vital aspect pertaining
to the survival of APSARAS for almost three decades is that, during its sensitive incubation in which it was
nurtured by CHITRALAYA music-group-leader Sinniah Selladurai, the Mohan-Rangan combination established a
fantastic euphoria especially in the minds of the swabasha-speaking public, with especially that charismatic compere BH Abdul
Hameed boosting APSARAS's splendid musical feats to Himalayan heights.
Selladurai
The key person working
behind the scenes, consistent and
continuous, even prior to the
formation of APSARAS, and who has
lived through its ups and downs and managed its promotion,
poster preparations, publicity and
overall organization in general, and
continues to keep the life throb of APSARAS resounding,
is Sinniah Selladurai.
Selladurai is the principal
axle around which the CHITHRALAYA music group and later the APSARAS music group
revolves. He continues to be an active member of APSARAS,
as a vocalist, rendering especially
fast numbers.
It was Selladurai, a student of Muthuswamy Master, who initially formed CHITHRALAYA with his brothers
Sri Kanthan alias Rajendran, and
Rangan.
Notwithstanding
Selladurai's yearning to master the serpina or harmonium,
the piano accordion and finally the electric organ,
he was not only sharp in spotting the inborn talent of young Moharaj at age-13
on the keyboards but was also altruistic-minded to suppress his penchant for
playing on these instruments, and
encouraged Mohanraj to fill that slot.
Although Mohanraj was the
'baby' in the group, Selladurai was
gracious to acknowledge him as the leader of APSARAS and give him the fullest
co-operation and support in establishing the group.
Selladurai developed into a
vocalist and made some important contributions in the musical extravaganzas, which were to thrill local and overseas audiences.
His elder brother
Mylvaganam's moral and physical support to CHITHRALAYA extending later on to
APSARAS was tremendous, while the
eldest brother Murugiah took upon himself to fend for his four younger brothers
in a family of eight in the absence of their father who had passed on when they
were very young sometime in 1961.
Mohanraj's first exposure
at music direction in movies in the year 1977 at age 15 was under the strict
guidance and supervision of his father,
Muthuswamy Master, for the local
Tamil movie Pulugargal Jaakradhai at the Sarasavi Studio in Kelaniya.
Others associated with this
project included the top-flight violinist,
MK Rocksamy, SHAKTHI lead guitarist
A Surendra and his father, Anthony, played their mandolins,
with jazz-drummer, Nesan
Thiagarajan. However, production of
this movie ran into difficulties,
and the project was apparently shelved mid-way.
Other Sinhala movies
followed: Veera Udhaara, Love in Bangkok, Raja Kello,
Rajawanseyen Ekek, movie-star Geetha
Kumarasinghe's production of Hira Bata Tharuwa,
Uthura Dhakuna, and Vairayen
Vairaya. In Hira Bata Tharuwa, the
entire music and melodies were produced by Mohanraj.
Apart from a number sung in
this movie by Pundit WD Amaradeva, a
duet sung in this movie by Gratian Ananda and Angeline Gunatilleke, was adopted in another of Geetha's production
titled Salambak Handai.
In recent weeks Mohanraj
did a solo number titled Sangeetha at the Chennai Prasad Studio, with Hemasiri Halpita writing the lyrics, under the music direction of the famous Deva for a
forthcoming Sinhala movie to be titled,
while the Tamil songs were sung by the great SPB.
Members
APSARAS continues to
survive despite continual changes in its membership with the passage of time.
Apart from Mohanraj who is
in overall supervision including guitars and vocals while playing on the
keyboards, Rangan used to play on
triple-congos and supervise all rythms. Fayaz Zavahir served onetime as an
assistant on keyboards. Akram presently plays the bongos.
Comperes at various stages
in shows include the dashing and dynamic BH Abdul Hameed,
Vijayarajah, Rajeswari Shanmugam and
her son, S
Chandrakanthan, and
presently vocalist Ameen Khan.
Those who strum the lead
guitar include Ananda Perera,
Ayaz-Zavahir, Anthony Surendra, Mahinda Bandara,
and presently Nelson John, while
rhythm was looked after by Anthony Surendra,
and bass by the left-handed Christie Watson,
Jagath Jayawardena, Raju Bandara and
later on by the acclaimed violinist's son,
Jeevan Rocksamy.
Sons of the renowned Gadam
Master, Kalasuri Guruvayur KK
Atchudhan & SLBC violinist Kamala: Radhakrishnan played violin while
Ravindran was a maestro at the mirudhangam.
At various times, Benhur Fernando,
Nesan Thiagarajan, extolled for his
extended dramatic drum-breaks, and K
Prabhagaran play on jazz-drums/octopad,
while thabla renditions are made by Radha Weerasingham and Ratnam Ratnadhurai, and the dholak was tapped at various times by the
famous Fuji Ismail and presently by his son Naushad. Mohamed Hussain, always the-man-Friday,
plays percussion.
Indian
Vocalists
Famed South Indian playback
singers who have been backed by APASARAS include the famous P Leela, Jikki,
Jamunarani, MS Rajeswary, P Susheela,
LR Easwary, Vaani Jeyaram, S Sarala,
Malaysia Vasudevan and his son Yugendran,
Mano, Minminie,
AL Raghavan, Jeyachandran, Kalpana Raghavendra,
Karthik, Srinivas, Harish Ragavendra,
Arulmoly, Unni Menon, Chithra Sivaraman,
Vasundara Das, Usha Udhup, Anuradha Sriram,
Mahalaxmi, Maalathy, Madhangi,
Sri Lekha Parthasarathy,
Manickavinayagam, Pop Shalini, Sabeshan,
Dhevan, and the two giants of the
South Indian playback arena: SP Balasubramaniam and TM Soundararajan and son
TMS Balraj.
The Tippu & Harini duet
excelled with Mohanraj in recent weeks in Australia.
A phalanx of local
vocalists have appeared against the APASARAS background. Prominent and
consistent amongst them are the late G Balasubramaniam who was a typical
imitation of the South Indian comedian-singer,
JP Chandrababu, the erudite and
splendid music teacher N Rakunathan,
Jeyabarathidhasan, Jegadevi, Lilly Mylvaganam,
M Sivakumar, V Premanand, Rani Fernando,
Rani Joseph, Ranjan Saliya Perera, Saifullah Mehedoom the Hindi songster suitably
replaced by the popular Tony Hassen,
S Selladurai the fast-number exponent,
and the teenager with a sweet voice Vidhyashini,
daughter to Mohanraj.
On the Sinhala side we see
APSARAS backing the great Pundit WD Amaradeva,
Visharadha Nanda Malini, Kalasuri
Lata Walpola, Sujatha Attanayake, Gratian Ananda,
Angeline Gunatilake, Nirosha
Virajini, Champa Kalhari, Sameetha Mudhunkotuwa,
Athula Adhikari and Jagath Wickramasinghe.
Dancers have participated
in the form of Helen Kumari, Vasugi
Shanmugampillai, and the famous
Channa Wijewardene's dance troupe,
while the South Indian artiste, Silk
Sumitha, took part in the APSARAS
UK-European-Scandinavian tour,
Inisai Iravu, with P Susheela and
TMS in Sep-Oct, 1991.
Survival
Unlike so many local music
groups which have mushroomed,
flowered and faded over the years,
APSARAS stands firm like a lotus spread well above the waterline, splendidly blooming in its colorful musical
performances, while proudly
possessing a memorable history of important people,
places and events, which all
confluxed to bring about its birth.
Selladurai's ideal
imagination figures that grand day when those original APSARAS music group
members, vocalists and comperes who
are still in harness, with top South
Indian stars thrown in, will
participate under the supervision of Mohanraj in an extended grand musical show, worthy of being reminisced for decades by
generations. Perhaps, time will
tell.
27.Oct.2004: Brando’s Godfather revisited: Francis Ford
Coppola’s The Godfather trilogy.
(Daily News: Art Scope:
p-iii). http://www.dailynews.lk/2004/10/27/artscop09.html
Cinema
Brando's Godfather revisited
by Firoze Sameer
|

Marlon
Brando, the Godfather Courtesy Paramount Pictures
|
"A lawyer with a
briefcase can steal more money than a thousand men with guns."
Mario Puzo in The Godfather
Papers and Other Confessions.
"Behind every great
fortune there is a crime."
Balzac quoted by Puzo in
The Godfather
Marlon Brando's death on
July 1 at age-80 brings back vivid memories of his scintillating role in the
box-office movie The Godfather (1972).
It was followed by Bernardo
Bertolucci's French-Italian Last Tango in Paris
(1973) and Coppola's controversial Vietnam war epic Apocalypse Now (1979) based
on Joseph Conrad's brilliant novel Heart of Darkness.
Newsweek and TIME of July
12 carried some fine appreciations and photos of Brando. Life magazine of March
10, 1972 front-page featured Brando
in his role as The Godfather.
Brando's film debut in The
Men in 1950 ended with a total of 35-appearances,
notable among them being A Streetcar Named Desire (1951),
The Wild One (1954), On the
Waterfront (1954) winning best actor amongst the eight Oscars, Guys and Dolls (1955),
Sayonara (1957), The Young Lions
(1958), One-Eyed Jacks which Western
was the only movie he directed (1961),
Mutiny on the Bounty (1962), The
Ugly American (1963), Morituri with
the bald-headed Yul Brynner (1965),
to his last Don Juan DeMarco (1995) with Faye Dunaway.
U.S. film critic Leonard Maltin
called The Godfather as the 1970s' answer to Gone With The Wind. Movie director
Francis Ford Coppola transformed Mario Puzo's fine book of the same title, published in 1969,
into celluloid by dividing it into two parts. Later,
he covered the complete epic from 1902 to 1958 called the Godfather Saga on
home-video (1981) comprising a chronological arrangement with additional pieces
from the cutting floor, of the first
movie and Part-II (1974), followed
by a final Part-III (1990). Nino Rota's splendid signature tune decidedly
haunts the mind of the filmgoer.
Author Andrew Yule in his
Al Pacino:
A Life on the Wire (1991), and
professor of film studies at UCLA,
Nick Browne, editing Francis Ford
Coppola and the Godfather Trilogy (2000),
a serious and solid treatise comprising independent high profile analyses by
some top professors in the film industry,
include various breakdowns of costs,
profits and earnings in the three movies.
Turnover
Looking at costs of
production of the three movies in the range of less than U$7.5mn for GF-I, U$15mn for GF-II and U$54mn for GF-III, they grossed approx. U$86mn (1972), U$32mn (1974) and U$70mn (1990) respectively. GF-I
& GF-II had by 1989 grossed in excess of U$800mn. It is said that over the
years the trilogy did business of over a billion dollars!
For GF-I, Paramount
claimed 84% of the profit, leaving
7.5% for producer Albert S Ruddy, 6%
for Director Coppola, and 2.5% for
author Puzo who wrote the screenplay with Coppola.
Brando was reportedly paid
only U$50,000 but collected U$100,000 for his co-operation with publicity, and, on
a sliding-scale percentage of the movie's gross,
finally landing him some U$1.5mn. His demand for U$500,000
plus 10% of the gross for GF-II was turned down,
and the part went to Robert de Niro.
Al Pacino who played
Michael collected U$35,000 for one year's
work in GF-I, receiving some U$500,000 plus no less than 10% of profit for GF-II, culminating for GF-III at U$5mn plus 15% of gross.
Diane Keaton who played
Michael's wife, Kay Adams, was able to collect U$2mn in GF-III vis-...-vis
the pittance she collected in GF-I: U$6,000.
Robert Duvall playing the Consigliori,
Tom Hagen, demanded for U$3.5mn
against Paramount's
U$1.5mn and was turned down and replaced with George Hamilton in GF-III.
Director Coppola collected
U$3-mn to direct, U$1-mn to write and
U$2-mn plus 15% of gross to produce GF-III,
as against what he received for GF-II: U$200,000
for direction, U$250,000 for the script plus on a formula ranging
between 10% and 15% as co-producer.
Awards
Perhaps The Godfather
fitfully won the Academy awards for Best Picture,
Actor (Brando), and Screenplay
(Coppola & Puzo), and also in
that one is able to discern the special features in the movie. GF-I & GF-II
totally were nominated for 21-Oscar nominations,
and collected nine, both winning
Best Film Awards.
The momentous meeting
Virgil "The Turk" Sollozzo has with Don Corleone in the presence of
his Consigliori Tom Hagen, the two
Caporegimes, Sal Tessio (Abe Vigoda)
and Pete Clemenza (Richard Castellano),
and two of the Don's sons, Santino
(James Caan) and Fredo (John Cazale),
prompted U.S. management guru, the
late Donald McCormick to cite Sonny's faux pax as an example of observing
fringe times in business interactions in his masterpiece,
What They Don't Teach You At Harvard Business School.
Reminiscent in GF-I is the
initial introduction of Don Vito Corleone (Brando) in a sudden reverse shot, seated behind his table in his paneled office, intently listening with composure and assumed
power, kitted up in black suit and
brilliant white shirt complete with tuxedo and blood red nosegay, to attend his daughter's wedding, the camera focusing directly on the undertaker, Amerigo Bonasera,
facing the Don, relating his
daughter's trauma; seeking for revenge.
Sparks of professionalism at its
peak is also seen in the Don's two brief discourses with the deadly Luca Brasi, enforcer to the Corleone Family, and in the famous speech made by the Don to the
head of the Five Families.
Drama
GF-I carries a slew of
dramatic events, which have an
everlasting impact on the filmgoer. The dramatic assassination of Luca Brasi in
the bar owned by the Tattaglia Family; the tragic ambush of Sonny; Sollozzo's
car taking that high-speed U-turn amidst klaxons,
as the driver, Lou, crosses over the road's divider across the
splendid Triborough bridge connecting New Jersey and New York; the deadly
confrontation of Michael with Sollozzo (Al-Lettieri) and Police Captain
McCluskey (Sterling Hayden) at Louis' Italian-American Restaurant in the Bronx;
Consigliori Tom Hagen taking a short drink before he plucks up courage to break
tragic news to the Don.
The Don's visit to Bonasera
seeking his services to return a favour.
The Don's memorable address
to the head of the Five Families and their associates at a secret conference, seeking for peace. Scenes in the backyard of the
Corleone home with the Don and Michael,
and later the Don and his grandson,
Anthony, amidst the tomato vines, ending a marked shift in the story; the terrible
scenes of bloody violence; all contributing toward Coppola's masterpiece in
direction.
Puzo in his The Godfather
Papers and Other Confessions describes the fury of Frank Sinatra directed
against him while dining at the famous Chasen's in Hollywood on account of the
Johnny Fontane character in his book,
allegedly portraying a resemblance to Sinatra.
According to Puzo, the incident was a case of a Northern Italian
threatening a Southern Italian,
which Puzo equates to Einstein pulling a knife on Al Capone!
Fascinating
advice
The book and movie are inundated
with some fascinating advice given intermittently by the Godfather to his sons
or close associates at various times.
In Puzo's opus at Book-8: Chapter-30, the Don gives Michael one of the most valuable
lessons on how he came to use a guy like Luca Brasi,
and Michael had used it to make the deadly ex-cop Albert Neri his Brasi.
Other brief but vital
snippets to Bonasera: "And that by chance if an honest man such as yourself
should make enemies, then they would
become my enemies. And then they would fear you."
"You spend time with
your family? to Johnny Fontane who replies,
"Sure I do." Then to Johnny,
but toward and about Sonny: "Good. 'Cause a man who doesn't spend time
with his family can never be a real man."
Upbraiding Johnny: "You can act like a
man! "What's the matter with you? Is this how you turned out? A Hollywood finocchio that ah cries like a woman? (then
mimicrying Johnny, as Tom giggles)
"What can I do?! What can I do?! What is that nonsense? Ridiculous."
Again to Johnny: "I'll make him an offer he can't refuse," referring to Jack Woltz, the Hollywood director.
To a friend "He
performs these miracles for strangers,"
referring to his son, Michael's
deeds as a captain in WW2.
To Virgil "The
Turk" Sollozzo:
"I said that I would see you because,
I heard that you're a serious man,
to be treated with respect." and after Sonny's faux pas, "I have a sentimental weakness for my
children, and I spoil them as you
can see; they talk when they should listen."
Admonishing his son Sonny: "Never tell anybody
outside the family what you're thinking again!" To Hagen, Tessio and Clemenza: "Now, any man should be allowed one foolishness in his
life. I have had mine."
Then to his successor, Michael: "You cannot say 'no' to the people you love, not often. That's the secret. And then when you do, it has to sound like a 'yes'. Or you have to make
them say 'no'. You have to take time and trouble." Adding that:
"Friendship is everything. Friendship is more than talent. It is more than
government. It is almost the equal of family. Never forget that...."
To Michael again: "Revenge is a dish
that tastes best when it is cold."
Advising Michael: "It's an old habit.
I spent my life trying not to be careless - women and children can be careless, but not men." And then: "I've done my
share in life. I haven't got the heart any more. And there are some duties the
best of men can't assume."
Once again to Michael: I knew that Santino was
going to have to go through all this. And Fredo - well - Fredo was - well - But
I never - I never wanted this for you. I work my whole life, I don't apologize,
to take care of my family. And I refused - to be a fool - dancing on the string, held by all those - bigshots. I don't apologize -
that's my life - but I thought that - that when it was your time - that - that
you would be the one to hold the strings.
Senator - Corleone.
Governor - Corleone, or
something..."Michael quips: "Another pezzonovante..." and the Don
continues: "Well - this wasn't enough time,
Michael. Wasn't enough time..." Michael adds: "We'll get there, Pop - we'll get there..." And then:
"Uh..." Now listen - whoever comes to you with this Barzini meeting -
he's the traitor. Don't forget that."
Tragedies
In the real life scenario, Brando had to face the shooting of his daughter Cheyenne's BF by his son Christian in 1990 who served a
term of some 6-years, and before he
was released Brando experienced the tragedy of Cheyenne hanging herself in 1995.
Coppola had his own share
of tragedy when his 22-year old son Gian-Carlo - Gio - was killed on 27.05.86, when his speedboat struck a towline of another
boat, while in the company of Ryan
O'Neal's son Gliffin Patrick, 21, who was later charged with reckless piloting.
Life thereafter was
probably never the same again - Coppola's quest is mirrored in Michael's search
for himself in GF-III - for these grand folks who gave us such splendid and
memorable movies to feast our imagination.
13.Oct.2004: A tribute to Gamini Fonseka: Sinhala movie idol
& director/Statesman.
(Daily News: Art Scope:
p-vii). http://www.dailynews.lk/2004/10/13/artscop05.html
A tribute to
Gamini Fonseka
by Firoze Sameer
"In the latter part of
the 1960s, Film Director Titus
Thotawatte's Sinhala movie, Chandiya
portrayed Ossie Corea towards the end of the movie. As reminisced over a
telephone conversation with the author on 13.07.98,
actor Kalasuri Dr. Gamini Fonseka,
now pushing 62, explained that, 'Mr. Ossie Corea played a very brief role in the
movie in the closing scenes of the last reel. Mr. Corea was portrayed as the
new Chandiya of the 1960-70 era in that precinct,
driving an elegant Sunbeam Alpine,
in expensive shirt and sarong,
smoking, with a cigarette tin in
hand, gold chain and gold wristwatch, looking tough and prosperous.' Corea's emergence
follows that of the Chandiya of the 1950-60 era,
remarkably acted in the movie by Gamini Fonseka.
|

by Firoze
Sameer
|
"...Dr. Gamini
Fonseka's portrayal of the deadly Mr. Linton Cooray,
in Anthima Reya, which was directed
by him, and screened in over a dozen
cinemas in Aug-Sep-Oct-1998, is a
classic piece of the local Godfather in crime: a similar role which was
brilliantly portrayed by him in the Sinhala teledrama Sudu Saha Kalu.
"Incidentally, Dr. Gamini Fonseka was appointed by President
Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga as Governor of the North-East Provincial
Council in December 1995. He submitted his resignation,
on a point of principle, from his
Governorship to President Chandrika Bandaranaike on Mon. 19.10.98. Earlier, he held the post of Deputy Speaker in Parliament
during the Premadasa regime...." - dOSIEr COREA: A portfolio on crime by
Firoze Sammer (1999: Library of Congress Control No. 99953012).
*******
We witnessed the fitting
tribute, extended by President
Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga to the great movie mogul, Kalasuri Dr. Gamini Fonseka,
in conducting his last rites at the Independence
Square on October 03. We heard many an encomium
and have already read various versions of his colourful life in all the recent
weekend newspapers. Gamini Fonseka,
passed away on September 30,
succumbing to a heart attack at age 68. He was born on March 21, 1936.
Gamini's splendid
performances range over a hundred-odd movies with a myriad of stars, especially Joe Abeywickrema,
Sandhya Kumari, Malini Fonseka over
the years since he assisted in Dr. Lester James Peries' Rekawa in 1956.
Notable were the
politically tinged movies Sagarayak Meda (1981) and his highly professional
direction of some of them, Koti
Valigaya (1988) with Angela Seneviratne and Nomiyena Minissu (1994) with
Sangeetha Weeraratne. And then the State-suspended Judgement, which rounded up a gamut of valuable contributions
to the local movie industry.
Movieland
The fine quality of his
movies far superseded those that came in cohorts from Bombay
and Madras.
Whether he won the merit
award at the Sarasaviya Film Festival for his part in Gamperaliya in 1964, or was adjudged Best Actor for the daring role of
Jamis Banda (a local version of James Bond) in Mike Wilson's Sorunegeth Soru
(1968), and in the latter day
serious portrayals as the Brando of the local screen,
he was certainly the Don of the Sinhala movie,
and he played his roles to perfection.
I never personally met him, but there was an interesting interaction which I
must recount:
After Gamini Fonseka had
read the complimentary copy I had autographed and sent him on Ossie Corea, he telephoned me one Sunday night May 28,2000 sometime around 9.30 p.m. and spoke to me in
that inimitable stately voice of even cadence,
so familiar to all of us, lucidly in
impeccable English, for over half an
hour, encouraging me to continue
writing, and then related an
interesting story.
Godfathers
He said there was a time
Ossie Corea had fallen out with his erstwhile childhood friend, Ramakrishna,
a big-time businessman cum Arrack-renter like Corea,
and an equally dangerous man.
Sometime later, Ramakrishna's mother passed on. Corea who knew and
revered Ramakrishna's mother during his days of friendship with her son, yearned to visit the Ramakrishna residence at
Kotahena in Colombo
and pay his respects to the lady,
but was precluded owing to the bad blood which prevailed between him and
Ramakrishna.
It was then that Corea had
appealed to Gamini Fonseka whom he and almost everyone used to idolize as one's
hero in those good old days. Gamini advised Corea to make that visit much to
the reluctance of Corea. Corea complained that he had no car (the famous
Sunbeam Alpine had been smashed up supposedly by Ramakrishna's boys) and he
hardly had any money (Corea was on the decline). So Gamini came forward and
volunteered with both, money and his
car, inducing Corea to go to
Kotahena.
Corea finally made that
visit with much trepidation and uncertainty,
only to be warmly welcomed, hugged
and kissed by Ramakrishna, and they
became friends thereafter.
In a world where people
found it easy to fall out with each other even on the flimsiest pretexts, here was the great Gamini Fonseka, icon of the Sinhala screen,
playing his grand role in bringing two local Dons once again together. Such was
the respect and esteem he commanded even amongst the 'dangerous' people, portraying the high calibre and status of the man.
Gentleman
The other aspect of Gamini
Fonseka was his high degree of self-worth,
self-respect, and straight-forwardness
(he called a spade a spade): a gentleman par excellence. And his commendable
deportment, exuding adequate but not
over elaborate respect was discerned,
especially when meeting with the highest authority in the land.
Gamini's departure evokes a
deep sense of sorrow to everyone who touched him in some small way or otherwise, and digs deep a lacuna in the Sinhala film
industry which in the years ahead,
will find it absolutely hard to fill.
21.July.2004: Horror of Hannibal
Lecter.
Thomas Harris’s complete
works/movies: Black Sunday, Red
Dragon,
The Silence of the Lambs,
Hannibal. (Daily News: Art Scope:
p-vii).
http://www.dailynews.lk/2004/07/21/artscop07.html
Horror of Hannibal Lecter
by Firoze Sameer
American author Thomas
Harris has written four blockbusters within a period of some twenty-four years!
Fans have been patiently waiting for his fifth since year 1999.
His first fantasy, Black Sunday,
published in 1975 covers a thrilling terrorist plot devised by Al Fatah's Black
September pitched against Mossad Aliyah Beth and the FBI/CIA, culminating in a catastrophic bid to fragment-bomb
the Super Bowl in New Orleans.
|

|
|
A scene from Red Dragon. Courtesy Liberty
Cinema
|
Flashes of the modus
operandi of sorts of 9/11 come to mind. However,
it's in Harris's trilogy, especially
when they were transformed into super films,
which brought fame.
The trilogy, Red Dragon (1981),
The Silence of the Lambs (1988) and Hannibal (1999),
comprises the horrors of the deadly Hannibal Lecter,
M.D., portrayed splendidly by Sir
Anthony Hopkins in Hollywood's
movies. Jodie Foster plays that daring role of FBI special agent Clarice
Starling in director Jonathan Demme's Lambs.
Lambs was the Oscar-winner
for Best Picture, Actor (Hopkins), Actress (Foster),
Director and Adapted Screenplay (Ted Tally). Foster reportedly demanded a
mammoth U$20-mn for its sequel Hannibal
but was turned down and Julianne Moore got that part,
playing it equally well. Black Sunday covers some 400-paperback pages, while the complete trilogy on Dr Hannibal Lecter
is bigger by about three-and-a-half times.
Adolf
Hitler
Apart from a spate of some
superb character roles played by Hopkins, his chilling portrayal of Adolf Hitler in the
TV-movie The Bunker (1981) won him an Emmy Award.
|

|
|
Thomas Harris
|
The Bunker covers the grim
history of the Reich Chancellery Group in the last 105-days during the first
term of 1945 in the Bunker, 55-feet
below ground-zero in bomb-ridden Berlin, grandly adapted by John Gay from James P
O'Donnell's brilliantly researched book.
Author Stephen King in the
New York Times Book Review compares Harris's Hannibal and William Peter
Blatty's The Exorcist (another memorable movie by William Friedkin who gave us
that spectacular car chase in The French Connection and an even more terrific
one in To Live and Die in LA) as the two most frightening novels (what about
Stanley Kubrick's adaptation of King's The Shining!) of our time, hoping that Harris will write again sooner than
later.
Special Agent Jack Crawford
in the trilogy is reportedly the inspiration for John Douglas who served the
FBI for twenty-five years, retiring
in 1995, playing an integral part in
some high-profile investigations including the Unabomber case and the terribly
tragic JonBenet Ramsey murder of 25/26.12.96,
which became a cause celebre in the U.S. Douglas has jointly published some
important books on his erstwhile profession including the classic Crime
Classification Manual with Ann & Allen Burgess and Robert Ressler, and over half a dozen with Mark Olshaker, notable being The Cases That Haunt Us.
Chilly
snow
In painting a portrait of
the horrors of "Hannibal
the Cannibal," Harris fixes his
easel higher up the mountain slopes nearer the peak amidst the chilly snow. He
uses very refined language,
sometimes aptly ostensible,
displaying an aptitude in a diverse array of disciplines.
In-depth knowledge of
psychiatry and its related drugs and injections,
high-security prison and hospital procedures for the criminally insane, asides relating to chamber music/the philharmonic
orchestra, comprehensive recipes on
five star cuisine, selection of
quality wines and liqueurs, usage of
high grade perfume, a slice of the
high-life syndrome, the craft of
medical surgery, incisive criminal
investigation techniques, use of the
VICAP (Violent Criminal Apprehension Program) computer database on multiple
offenders, the diverse strategies
and tactics adopted by the FBI to solve murders,
the dos and donts in a murder scene,
let alone professional telephone-tapping,
all requiring intensive research and in-depth study. No surprise the unduly
lengthy span between his novels.
Harris chronologically
positions Hannibal
seven years after the Lambs episode. Readers can forgive him in Hannibal's Ch-4 for
reducing Crawford's age to 56 - one year short of retirement - vis-...-vis the
beginning of Ch-5 in the Lambs in which he is 53! However,
in the Lambs, the degree of medical plausibility
does surface over Miggs swallowing his own tongue and dying, following Lecter's suggestion in taking his
revenge on Miggs' indiscretion of flinging semen on pretty Starling from his
cell during her visit to interview Lecter at the Baltimore
State Hospital
for the Criminally Insane in Maryland.
Harris's hundred and three
chapters in Hannibal
fall within six sections. He includes some coverage on Sardinia and
significantly Florence in Italy and
sparks of the township's fascinating medieval history as background material.
The bizarre climax at the end of the book is a tad different from the movie's
end, probably maintaining moral
balance conforming with audience concepts.
Apart from shooting Garrett
Jacob Hobbs, Will Graham is the man
who catches Lecter who in the process carves him with a linoleum knife. Lecter, the brilliant psychiatrist gone mad, has six fingers on his left hand, is dangerously cunning and deadly, uses an economy of speech with well primed words, and has a phenomenal sense of smell.
Calm
seaside
Graham is induced from
retirement from his calm seaside home and family by Crawford to hunt the Red
Dragon. Harris takes the reader through Lecter's imprisonment in Dragon, in which Graham investigates the murder of the
Jacobi family in Birmingham and the Leeds family
in Atlanta with
some 'expert' advice about the killer's psyche and probable next move from
Lecter in his cell.
Lecter, at the same time,
devises another - this time indirect - attempt to murder Graham and his family
via the killer! The dramatic scene arranged in the movie of the Dragon's
'punishment' meted to Freddy Lounds of the National Tattler newspaper in broad
daylight in the heart of Chicago city was,
to say the least, horribly
stupendous.
Harris continues with the
Lambs, which is considered his
masterpiece, where Starling picks up
vital clues from Lecter on the "Buffalo Bill" serial killer who skins
his victims.
The sight of the stately
Lecter in the movie, bound to his
wheel-chair and gagged with the famous brown,
brutish barred visage across his nose and mouth is awful,
while the dramatically devastating escape scene of Lecter from custody in a
cell in the Tennessee Department of Corrections in Memphis amidst the gore of
bleeding dead bodies epitomize the high-point of Hollywood's professionalism.
Impressive is Lecter's crafty use of his extensive experience as counselor to
determine Starling's background in his several interactions with her seated
outside his cell.
Private
victim
Finally, the dragnet spread out for him by the FBI, and especially by an affluent private victim, Mason Verger - sporting a horribly mangled visage
in bed or in a wheel chair - seeking deadly revenge,
in the global manhunt for Lecter in Hannibal, in which Harris is at his best in description and
narration.
Lecter's spine-tingling
confrontation with the avaricious chief investigator of the Questura in Florence, Rinaldo Pazzi,
raises the reader steadily to the heights of horror and disbelief, while incisively picking one's memory palace to
its limit, especially in the movie.
Richard Schikel, in his fine two-page appreciation on Marlon
"The Godfather" Brando in TIME (12-July) says,
"Then let's think about how in a minor but still palpable way our lives -
especially our imaginative lives - would have been diminished if Brando had not
been there to play them." How very true,
and probably Hopkins
too, in a very different way, falls into that inimitable class. A master at his
craft.
The Guardian compares
popular fiction in the last two decades of the 19th century dominated by Sir
Arthur Conan Doyle and Sherlock Holmes while a century on suspense literature
achieved their equals in Thomas Harris and Hannibal Lecter.However, the Evening Standard in a blurb on Hannibal says
that, "He's not doing it for
money and there won't be another Lecter novel." That was certainly sad.
Of The Aeneid, Caesar Augustus,
Jesus and Zeus
by Rohan
Jayawardana
The quite
beautiful and informative piece in Artscope on Wednesday June 9, 2004 by Firoze Sameer which enlarged upon the
Greek poet Homer's epics has prompted this brief note.
It has to do with
a purely idiosyncratic personal opinion concerning the origins of the Roman
poet Virgil's epic poem "The Aeneid". This is based upon the
available data concerning the powerful personalities of the times of Virgil.
Augustus and Christ
As stated by Firoze Sameer,
the poems of the Greek known to us only as "Homer" were written in
the 8th century B.C., mostly based
in the characters of the Hellenes (Greeks) and the powerful events of their age
according to the tales passed down. Virgil came along eight centuries later
just as two other curious events of "modernity" coincided. It was (1)
in the (approx.) year of I.A.D. (anno domino) that Jesus Christ was born at the
same time (2) as the inauguration of the first Roman emperor Caesar Augustus.
Augustus himself was the appointed heir of the legacy of the "greatest
Roman", Gaius Julius Caesar
(100-44 BC), and he was known
earlier as "Octavian" (octave in music-eight - August the 8th
month!).
The poet Virgil
was one of the emperor Augustus' favourite associates and he wrote the epic of
Aeneas who is the hero of the AENEID in the times of Caesar Augustus and of
Jesus Christ (B.C. - before Christ). Was Aeneas based upon the heroic
characters of Caesar Augustus and his former associate Mark Antony? Its left to
be seen.
Jesus
It is also a noted
fact of biblical lore that when the King of Judaea,
Herod, ordered the slaughter of all
newborn infants in order to eliminate the infant Jesus,
his parents Joseph and Mary fled with the child to Egypt! Egypt itself is located across the river Nile to
the west of Judea (Israel)
and is a country of North Africa. It had to be
a long arduous journey indeed to get away from the inquiries of King Herod's
murderers. Thereafter Jesus the boy grew up in Egypt
and returned to Nazareth.
(What has this to do with the AENEID,
it may be wondered!
Scipio Africanus and Africa's
origins
It is a fact that
the legend of Aeneas the hero cannot be usually attributed to any specific
Roman of history. Most other heroes of Roman mythology are identified as
counterparts of the earlier Greek heroes of Homerian epics such as Jupiter for
Zeus; Hercules for Heracles; and Venus for Aphrodite,
etc.
However, the AENEID of the Roman poet Virgil would have had
its own complement of characters from the actual history of Rome itself; even
going back a few centuries to the earlier "glory days" of the B.C.
period featuring Scipio Africanus Minor their first military legend, and Julius Caesar of great fame. It was Scipio
Africanus Minor who finally defeated the all-conquering general Hannibal of
Carthage in 202 B.C. It was Africanus who first invaded the interior of the
continent of Africa!
It must be
realized that Carthage in North Africa is
locatable at modern Tunis and virtually next
door to the huge country of most ancient renown Egypt; and it was here that the
infant Jesus was taken for safety.
Therefore, it was most likely that it was in Egypt (next door to Carthage) that there occurred perhaps some
startling events which caused the Romans to take note. They had actually
invaded Africa two centuries earlier.
(One may wonder
whether the entire continent of Africa was named after the leader of the very
first invading army, the general
Scipio Africanus Minor who was attacking the rampaging Carthaginians located
today at the region of Tunis).
Jesus and Ulysses
In the
circumstances, if the boy Jesus was
a "wunderkind", he may
have been taken from history by Virgil into the Aeneid as Ulysses (Jesus?) In
which event Jupiter and Minerva could be guessed as Joseph and Mary the parents
of the "miracle child".
Then Scipio
Africanus Minor would be Aaeneas according to the information of his
peripatetic exploits! The giant Cyclops might have been of Carthage, the mighty Hannibal
who took his army on elephants over the Italian Alps to massacre the Romans for
two years from 218 BC. The giant Hercules B described as the "Saviour of
the world" and may be in Roman legend the emperor Augustus, the first royalty of ancient Rome.
Cleo and Dido?
The Phoenician
princes Dido (who is opined by Virgil to have founded Carthage)
might have been the fabulous Queen Cleopatra of Egypt
who comprehensively flattened the great Mark Antony of Rome in single (unarmed) combat!
The name Dido
easily equates with "Cleo". However,
in Greek mythology, Rome's
Ulysses counterpart is Odysseus the hero of "The Odyssey" involving
ten years of wandering en route to Ithaca (Greece) from Troy
probably in Asia Minor, close to Israel.
Ulysses' home was also Ithaca (not unlike the
word Israel), essentially a Grecian location in the context of
Virgil.
Jesus in Egypt
(North Africa)
The actual time of
Jesus' stay in Egypt
is not clear but there is a story of his going "missing" and being
re-discovered with a forum of learned men at youth.
If at that time of
life in the post resplendent era of ancient Egypt (it was now Greco-Roman) that
the growing Jesus could have been a local phenomenon who was out of sight of
recordists. Roman history itself got written once the empire was efficiently
organised by Caesar Augustus (BC 63-AD 14).
Origins of myths upon facts
The conjecture about the origins of Roman mythology covers
around 2 1/2 centuries but that of Greece (written in 800 B.C. by
Homer) covers a period of perhaps 2,000
years hidden in the mists of time in the Mediterranean zone reaching into the
Bronze Age. They encompass the Myceanean civilization at ancient Greece in 1600 BC approx (home of Agamemnon, King of the Greek army who led them against Troy in the Trojan war.
The heroes are out
of real events. But, what of the
gods, goddesses and mystical
phenomena? They are further back in history to times of "inspiration from
deity" (named Oracles later) and so forth within the Minoan civilization
at the Greek island
of Cretc.
Herein reigned
King Minos "son" of the principal "god" Zeus and of Europa
(from which came Europe) of the super beings
called Titans.
The Minoan
civilization was at 2500 BC. and later; and paralleled Sumer on the plain of Mesopotamia and the Euphrates Valley. Elsewhere was Egypt.
Evolution of earth and humanity?
It is the legends
of Greece
alone which describe in reasonably scientific applications the evolution of
planet Earth from "Chaos" into "Gaea" and so on.
The first peoples
are called the "Hellenes",
the Greeks. they formed the basis of the famed civilization of Hellenic Greece
at perhaps 1200 or 1000 BC and later. (see Pericles,
5th cent. B.C.).
Hollywood movie springs from Homer's epics
by Firoze
Sameer
Troy, the Hollywood movie, springs from Homer's grand Greek epics written
sometime in 800-BC: The Iliad and The Odyssey,
and Virgil's The Aeneid. Homer's works inspired Virgil,
taking him 12 years to almost finish his work in Latin in 19-BC.
Not apparently
taken into account in the movie is Quintus of Smyrna's Greek classic written
sometime in AD-360, (titled by the
publishers as The War at Troy), a
masterpiece in filling the hiatus where Homer leaves us in The Iliad. These
classics give the reader a fair exposure on the fantastically fabled Trojan
saga transformed into celluloid in this 21st century.
May 14 saw
Director Wolfgang Petersen's 160-min. movie Troy,
reportedly superseding Warner Bros' budget of US$ 175-million to a quarter
billion dollars, opening in some 3,500-locations. Peterson's precusors are In the Line
of Fire. Air Force One and The Perfect Storm.
TIME magazine (May
17) devotes six pages of extensive illustrative reporting on this adaptation of
Homer's Iliad which stars Brad Pitt (Achilles),
Eric Bana (Hector), Orlando Bloom
(Paris), Peter O'Toole (Priam), Julie Christie (Thetis),
Brian Cox (Agamemnon), Brendan
Gleeson (Menelaus), Sean Bean
(Odysseus) and the German newcomer Diane Kruger landing the role of Helen in
novelist cum screen-writer David Benioff's 140-page script, reportedly selling his idea to Warner Bros for
US$150,000.
Shooting of the
movie reportedly was partly in Malta
covering the scenes within the Trojan walls,
and owing to a terrorist scare vis-a-vis the war in Iraq, the location was shifted from Morocco to the
fantastic Mexican beach near Cabo san Lucas,
where the battle scenes required some 1,500-extras.
The Trojan War
It all began when
Prince Paris made that landmark judgement on Mount Ida
naming Aphrodite over Here and Pallas Athene as the most beautiful amongst
them. Aphrodite rewarded Paris with her promise
of the most beautiful woman in the world,
Helen, who unfortunately happened to
be married to King Menelaus of Sparta, brother to King Agamemnon.
Herodotus in The
Histories (circa-446BC) learned during his extensive travels in Egypt,
Africa and other parts of the Greek world,
that Paris abducted Helen with substantial
stolen Greek gold on his way home from Sparta
but a storm drifted the vessel to Egypt, where King Proteus held Helen and the treasure
captive and ordered Paris
to depart within three days.
Hence, when a Greek embassy comprising of Menelaus and
Odysseus arrived at Ilium, the Trojans were unable to return Helen or the
stolen treasure. Although Homer was familiar with this story, he appears to have rejected and modified it to
suit his epic poetry. Thus began the launch of the armada of 1,206 black,
crimson, and blue-prowed ships
across Homer's wine-red sea toward Troy.
The Iliad
Homer's poems rank
foremost in Greek literature to-date. The original epics translated into
English prose, take the reader
through the twenty-four books on the real ten-year tragedy of war in The Iliad, the Story of Achilles.
The tragic
theatres of war are all seriously laid out on the arid plains abutting the
seashores of ill-fated Troy.
Troy is identified with Hissarlik in the
north-west corner of Asia Minor, a point on the western Turkish border, reportedly an archaeological site where explorers
dig for artifacts of a buried city of a bygone era.
After Philip of
Macedonia was assassinated in 336-BC,
his son Alexander at 20 years of age ascended the throne,
and hardly had time to continue with his studies under Aristotle. Alexander the
Great reportedly carried with him The Iliad as a bedside book on his
extensively remarkable adventurous campaigns.
The Odyssey
The Odyssey covers
in its twenty-four books the ten-year travails of Laertes' son Odysseus of the
nimble wits on his homecoming from the cindering citadel of Troy
to the splendid shores of Ithaca in Greece.
His wife the
virtuous Penelope, son Telemachus, father Laertes and his dog Argus pine for his
return, while being subject to
harassment from a host of stubborn suitors living off the king's estate.
The Aeneid
The Aeneid by
Virgil (Publius Vergilius Maro) in his 12 books portrays the peregrinations of
Prince Aeneas, illustrious son of
Anchises, departing from the
devastated city of Troy with his son Ascanius and father and a group of Trojan
nobles to experience a hazardous voyage of varied amazing encounters at sea, eventually reaching Lavinium in Italy to establish
the foundations of the future Roman Empire.
Virgil reportedly
met his friend Augustus Caesar at Athens while on a trip to Greece, and returned with him,
but fell ill at Megara, and on
reaching Brindisi, died in 19-BC at
age 51.
In view of not
being able to finish this monumental work,
Virgil left instructions for it to be burned,
which instructions were, fortunately, countermanded by Augustus.
Quintus of Smyrna
Quintus of Smyrna, living in the Byzantine Empire sometime in AD-360, in the Homeric style successfully fills in several
lacunae left in The Iliad,
splendidly serving as its sequel in fourteen books,
intensely improving on many a lead found in The Odyssey,
and rendering to the reader a complete sense of satisfaction in one's erudition
of the entirety of the Trojan saga.
Quintus picks up
from where Homer ends The Iliad. He includes,
inter alia, the arrival and death of
Queen Penthesileia, Memnon and
Eurypylus at various stages in support of the Trojans,
the death of Achilles, Priam and his
son Paris and wife Oenone, the
tragic suicide of Telamonian Ajax the Great,
the arrival of Achilles' son,
Neoptolemus, the return of
Philoctetes to the Greek army, the
construction of the Wooden Horse,
and the sacking of Troy followed by the departure for home.
The battle at Troy
Homer
painstakingly describes the deaths of over 200 of the Argive (Greek) and Trojan
nobles and their respective allies,
taking great care to mention to name of the victor and the vanquished in each
incident in The Iliad, and on how
they came about to bite the dust at Troy.
The Troy movie is
reported to portray the dramatic man-to-man duels: Paris vs Menelaus, Hector vs Ajax the Great,
Achilles vs Hector, and probably for
want of time may leave out some of Homer's lesser episodes of gallantry:
Sarpendon vs Tlepolemus, Diomedes vs
Glaucus, Patroclus vs Sarpedon and
Hector vs Patroclus.
The poignant
centre-point in the entire epic is toward the end,
after the climactic Hector vs Achilles duel,
when old King Priam meets with Achilles in his tent seeking for his son, Hector's body,
after so many heroes on both sides lay slain.
Achaeans or Greeks
Homer and Quintus
describe several brief battles in which Greek kings and princes participate.
They include the Boeotian commanders: Peneleos,
Archsilaus, Prothoenor, Clonius and Leitus,
the last being the only survivor; Ascalaphus and Lalmenus; Schedius and
Epistrophes leading the Phocians; Oileus Ajax the Lesser as leader of the
Locrians, shipwrecked on his return
from Troy by Poseidon driving him onto the great cliff of Gyrae in which he
perished; Prince Elephenor leader of the fiery Abantes falling early in battle
to the spear of Agenor; Menestheus,
son of Peteos, the Athenian expert
on horses and infantry second only to wise old Nestor; Sthenelus and Euryalus, deputies to Diomedes,
surviving the war with their leader and returning home safely; King Agapenor, leading the Arcadians adept at hand-to-hand
fighting but ignorant of sea-faring; Amphimachus,
Diores, Thalpius, and Polyxeinus all from Buprasion, the first two falling to Prince Hector and the
Thracian ally Peiros; the able charioteer Meges from Dulichium; Andraemon's son, Thoas,
leading the Aetolians from the land of the mighty red-haired Meleager; the
spearman Idomeneus from the isle of Crete and Meriones the archer; Heracles'
son Tlepolemus from Rhodes who falls early in battle to the spear of the Lycian
commander Sarpedon; grandsons of Heracles: Phedippus and Antiphus, the latter and the handsome Nireus, second only to Achilles in looks, from Syme,
falling under the spear of Eurypylus; Podarces,
successor to his brother the great-hearted Protesilaus who was the first to
fall on Trojan soil; Admetus' son Eumelus the finest charioteer; the archer
Philoctetes, and Medon who falls
under Aeneas' spear; the brother-physicians Podaleirius and Machaon, the latter succumbing to the Trojan ally
Eurypylus; Euamon's highborn son,
Eurypylus, who does some significant
fighting, the dauntless Polypoetes
and Leonteus from Argissa; Gouneus from Cyphus leading the Enienes and
Peraebians; Prothous commanding the Magnetes....
Trojans and allies
On the Trojan side
we witness Antenor's son,
Archelochus and Acamas both succumbing to Ajax the Great and Philoctetes;
Pandarus the skilled bowman from Zeleia falling to the doughty Diomedes;
Adrestus and Amphius meeting their predicted doom,
the former to King Agamemnon; lordly Asius,
son of Hyrtacus, falling under the
spear of Idomeneus; Hippothous and Pylaeus leading the Pelasgian spearmen; the
Thracians: Acamas and Peiros both falling under the spears of Ajax the Great
and Thoas; Euphemus leading the Circones; Pyraechmes commanding the Paeonian
bowmen; and Pylaemenes the Paphlagonians,
both falling to Patroclus and red-haired Menelaus; Odius and Epistrophes
leading the Alizones from silver-rich Alybe,
the former falling to Agamemnon; Chromius and Ennomus the augur commanding the
Mysians: the latter fated to fall under the great runner Achilles; Phorcys and
Ascanius leading the Phyrigians, the
former falling to Ajax the Great while the latter succumbs to Neoptolemus; Sons
of Talaemenes, Mestles and Antiphus
leading the Maeonians; Nastes commanding the Carians with Amphimachus who, decked in gold,
is fated fall under Achilles' spear; Deiphobus,
son of Priam, who marries Helen after
Paris' death, defeated in a deadly
duel with Menelaus; King Priam falling under Neoptolemus' sword....
Odysseus and Ajax
the Great
Descriptions of
the contest for the armour of Achilles are found in Sophocles' work on Ajax and Ovid's Demosthenes and in The Metamorphoses
completed at Rome
in AD-8.
Quintus vividly
describes the contest for Achilles' armour between Ajax the Great and Odysseus, in which each contestant delivers a grand oration
on why such splendid armour should be awarded to him. But when the decision to
award the prize is taken by the sons of Troy
to Odysseus, Quintus has the Greek
army giving a groan.
Notwithstanding
Homer describing Odysseus killing a total of 17-nobles; Diomedes an equal
number plus the slaughter of King Rhesus and twelve of his companions while in
their sleep, Ovid's metamorphoses
has Odysseus, in his speech, cunningly attributing these thirteen slaughters to
himself! Homer has only a total of 14-killings of Trojan leaders to Ajax the Great.
Quintus gives
prominence to the mighty Ajax
the Great by crediting him with a dozen killings. He credits Odysseus, Diomedes and Meriones each with only half that
number. Quintus notoriously keeps the illustrious Odysseus completely out of
his funeral games owing to the wound inflicted by Alcon whom he kills in the
terrible fighting around the body of Achilles.
Quintus has Ajax the Great winning
uncontested in the event of fighting with hands and feet at his funeral games
vis-a-vis Homer placing him as second best in all his events.
Clytaemnestra and Penelope
Homer contrasts
between the wives of Agamemnon and Odysseus viz. Clytaemnestra (sister to
Helen) and Penelope: one wayward; the other virtuous.
The former, with the aid of her lover Aeigisthus, plots the butchering of her husband and his brave
entourage at a grand banquet on their return to Mycenae
from Troy.
The latter keeps
suitors at bay until she finishes her work of weaving a large shroud for
Laertes. She works by day only to stealthily undo her work by night for three
years after being given away by one of her women,
and thereafter forced to complete her work in the fourth by which time the
return of her husband is near.
Diomedes and Glaucus
The character of
Diomedes, son of the mighty Tydeus, is seen as a soldier and gentleman similar to
godlike Hector, Sarpedon and Glaucus
as against Achilles who rides rough and shoddy,
almost all brawn, somewhat like his
cousin Ajax the Great and to a lesser extent King Agamemnon.
Odysseus on the
other hand is crafty, clever and
guile, and even of almost equal in
strength to Ajax
the Great but excels in using his superior brilliance of intelligence, his well-poised sophistries,
his wisdom and wit to steal a march on his peers.
Diomedes' dialogue
with Glaucus on their respective ancestries,
in the midst of duelling with each other,
eventually leads to a private truce between them in the battle field and an
exchange of gold armour for bronze,
a hundred oxen's price for the price of nine.
In this act, Glaucus is not seen as the victim of an injustice
as endorsed by Aristotle in teaching his Ethics at the Lyceum to his students, a few years before his death in 322-BC at age 63.
Although Homer is careful to spare him,
Quintus has Glaucus falling under the mighty Ajax the Great's spear.
Funeral games
The funeral games
described by Homer, Virgil and
Quintus respectively are all a treat. Consequent on the death of his squire and
friend Patroclus, Achilles holds
funeral games amongst the Greek army. Quintus has Thetis doing so in honour of
her dead son Achilles.
Virgil has Prince
Aeneas conducting funeral games amongst the Trojans,
after Queen Dido's poignant suicide subsequent to his departure from Carthage in modern Tunisia, in honour of his father Anchises buried in Libya.
Chariot-racing, boxing wrestling, foot-racing,
sword-fighting, throwing the discus, archery,
broad-jump, fighting with hands and
feet, racing of ships, mock battle on horses,
with grand prizes for the participants,
cover the heroic events.
The wooden horse
Quintus has
30-Greek heroes hiding inside the Wooden Horse with courageous Sinon sitting
outside it.
A device, contrived by the resourceful Odysseus and built by
Epeius, left on the Trojan shores
with Sinon to guard it, while the
ships depart ostensibly for home commanded by Nestor and Agamemnon, but nevertheless docking in the nearby island of Tenedos,
awaiting the signal for the desired torch to shine.
The Trojans
approach the Wooden Horse cautiously at first,
and meet Sinon sitting outside it.
They cut his ears
and nose off, painfully torture him
with fire, and force him to speak.
He bluffs them into believing that the monument was built to appease Athena's
wrath and the Greeks had planned to sacrifice him by the roaring ocean, but he had escaped and had thrown himself at the
feet of the Horse.
Laocoon suggests
that they set fire to it, but the
Trojans decide against it and draw the Horse and Sinon through the gates of Troy and to their eventual destruction, notwithstanding the repeated cries within the
portals of the palace
of King Priam's daughter, the prophetess of Doom,
the intelligent and lovely Cassandra.
India's Trojan
India's Congress party secured a victory in the General
Elections ended May 10, qualifying
Sonia Maino Gandhi to become prime Minister of India over a population topping one
billion.
Perhaps the Muses
of Olympus, Daughters of
aegis-bearing Zeus, may tell us
about the origins of this full-blooded Roman lady hailing from the sunny village of Orbassano
near Turin,
probably tracing her roots to ancient Troy!
03.Mar.2004: Reading British - Five famous modern authors:Ian
Fleming, James Hadley Chase,
John Lé Carre,
Frederick Forsyth, JK Rowling. (Daily News: Art Scope:
p-vi).
http://www.dailynews.lk/2004/03/03/artscop10.html
Five
famous modern authors :
Reading British
by Firoze Sameer
Five British authors amass
147 novels!Like Homer's heroes at Troy
they come cascading almost into reality within the works of these accomplished
British authors: Ian Lancaster Fleming: 19-books at age 56 on his demise
12-Aug-64; James Hadley Chase: 88 novels at age-78 on his death 07-Feb-85. John
le Carre: 19-works pushing 71-years; Frederick Forsyth: 16-masterpieces at age
65. Joanne Katherine Rowling, OBE, clocking five famous Harry Potter episodes at 51+.
Enter Commander James Bond, CMG,
RNVR, of the Double-O Section of
HMSS with a licence to kill.
Bond movies from the
sixties saw the dashing debonair spy,
in his Navy blue suit over a sea island cotton shirt,
black silk knitted tie, dark blue
socks into black moccasins; gold Rolex Oyster perpetual chronometer; thin
cigarette case of black gun-metal to hold fifty; Continental Bentley or an
Aston Martin DBIII... ...Reminiscent is Sean Connery in Dr No lighting that
inevitable cigarette with his oxidized Ronson lighter,
elegantly introducing himself amidst the backdrop of that famous JB-theme, to a beaut across the baize in the casino as
"Bond, James Bond."
A dry Martini please, shaken but not stirred!
Fleming churned a Bond-book
in every year since Jan-52, spending
two months in his 14-acre hideout Goldeneye in the Jamaican North
Shore. At Goldeneye, he hammered on his US gold-plated typewriter at 2,000-words a day while Londoners strode grimly along
freezing wintry streets. Goldeneye was a refuge to some famed authors and
friends who spent their leisure time and again: Truman Capote, Ivar Bryce,
Noel Coward and even British PM Sir Anthony Eden.
|

|
|
Ian Fleming
|
Fourteen serious works on
the splendid gallantry of James Bond (decorously declining a knighthood in The
Man with the Golden Gun: 1965) in meticulous English with very educative
background material which Fleming assiduously collected,
visiting various countries in advance of writing each book.
The opus that fell within
JFK's ten favourite books; the one which Lady Jacqueline presented to CIA
Director Allen Dulles: Fleming's fifth and his best: From Russia With Love
(1957). Fleming's one book for kids Chitty-Chitty Bang-Bang was about a flying
car. His two-part Thrilling Cities gave the reader inside gen on the frisson of
some hot spots around the globe,
while The Diamond Smugglers revealed a very arcane trade. A short treatment on Kuwait titled State of Excitement written in Dec-60, his only unpublished book,
is reportedly being auctioned.
The reader is steeped into
the subjects of baccarat in Casino Royale (1953),
bridge in Moonraker (1955), diamonds
in Diamonds are Forever (1956), the
KGB's precursor SMERSH in From Russia With Love (1955),
birds in Dr No (1958) golf and gold in Goldfinger (1959),
poisonous plants in You Only Live Twice (1964) and so on.
Eight splendid short
stories couched in For Your Eyes Only (1960) and Octopussy (1965) where in its
title story Bond is featured as a third party investigating the suspicious WW2
record of a peer. Fleming did this kind of thing in The Spy Who Loved Me (1962)
bringing Vivienne Michel to centre stage,
relating the story through her eyes.
Fleming's piece on women
drivers in Ch-11 of Thunderball (1961) vis-…-vis Bond's admiration for Tracy brazenly racing
past him at the start of OHMSS (1963) reveals his inveterate male-chauvinism
inundated in all his books.
Commander Ian Fleming, RNVR,
reportedly lived the part of James Bond to a great extent. He served in Naval
Intelligence during WW2, and later
as ATTICUS writing a weekly column in the Sunday Times and Foreign Manager at
the Kemsley Group of newspapers. Peter his elder brother far exceeded him in
literacy. Ian's son Caspar Robert died of a drug overdose on 02.10.75 aged 23, and Ian's wife Ann of cancer in July-81.
Fortunately Fleming was not
around to witness these tragedies. His untimely demise was decidedly a great
loss to Bond buffs.
James
Hadley Chase
The 1960s saw us teenagers
at Royal College 61-Group swapping Chase novels
between classmates by the dozen over the days.
A book wholesaler, he began writing under the pen name James Hadley
Chase. He specialized in murder,
kidnapping, blackmail, espionage and intrigue.
His heroes were dynamic, his heroines sexy,
and villains deadly. Every story moved with stupendous speed. "One just
couldn't put that book down!" Chase's first and best novel No Orchids for
Miss Blandish (1938: superbly revised by him in July-61),
took him six weeks to write, and
established him as a master story-teller. It was dramatized in three movies in Britain,
France and the US. The Flesh
of the Orchid (1948) was its sole sequel.
Chase's dad served as a
British officer in the colonial Indian Army. Chase was born Rene Brabazon
Raymond in London
in 1906. He served in the RAF in WW2,
and moved to France in 1956
and over to Switzerland in
1961, living a secluded life in
Corseaux-Sur-Vevey north of Lake Geneva in
since 1974.
His heroes include the
dashing private-eyes Dave Fenner and Vic Malloy; super insurance sleuths Steve
Harmas, and the memorable Maddox;
Paradise City Police Headquarters played a prominent role in several books:
Captain of Police Frank Terrell,
down to Sgt Joe Beigler, Detective
2nd Grade Tom Lepski promoted later,
Detective 3rd Grade Max Jacoby, Fred
Hess of Homicide, sipping
intermittent cups of coffee, smoking
their cigarettes, in the process of
solving many a murder. Amongst JHC's various and varied villains Herman Radnitz
stands out, while the rugged
ex-Commando Martin Corridon featured in two episodes (now what were they?).
Chase successfully tried
his hand at some espionage episodes such as You Have Yourself a Deal and also
Have This One On Me and The Whiff of Money with the adventurous CIA agent Mark
Girland in a James-Bond-type role with Soviet agent Malik and probably Lu Silk
on the opposite side. His books rarely exceeded 200-pages. He touched mostly on
murder mysteries laced with a good dose of power,
violence and sex, giving the reader
such splendid moments of thrill.
With his death, readers sadly lost out on further flights of
plausible murder mysteries. His better known works include Tiger by the Tail, Eve,
Come Easy-Go Easy, Mallory, A Lotus for Miss Quon and Why Pick On Me?
John
le Carre
His 19th and latest opus
Absolute Friends featured in TIME magazine last week,
John le Carre hit fame with his third episode,
The Spy Who Came In From The Cold (1963). His treatment in The Spy of
side-tracking his usual hero George Smiley of British Intelligence in Call for
the Dead (1961) and A Murder of Quality (1962),
and drawing in Alec Leamas to centre-stage was an absolutely brilliant
arrangement in the le Carre genre.
Smiley is played so well by
Sir Alec Guinness in many of the TV-episodes,
while Richard Burton takes the role of the British agent Alec Leamas with Clair
Bloom in the Spy which was filmed in b&w to give a grim effect.
Former CIA director Allen
Dulles however notes in his book,
Great Spy Stories (1969) that the brilliant plot in the Spy could never have
happened while what was described in its successor The Looking-Glass War (1965)
unfolding the respective Runs of Taylor,
Avery and Leiser, was plausible. The
British mole Kim Philby (who was made a major-general by the Soviets after his
defection to Moscow)
too had the same view. Nevertheless Graham Greene truthfully called the Spy
"the greatest spy story I have ever read,"
while Fleming said, "A very, very fine spy story."
Le Carre's trilogy The
Quest for Karla begins with his super Tinker,
Tailor, Soldier, Spy,
(TTSS) (1974), The Honourable
Schoolboy (THS) (1977) and Smiley's People (1979) all portraying the grim
realties of the Cold War. His ability to draw Jerry Westerby who played a minor
role in TTSS to lead role in THS was real Le Carre technique.
Le Carre's head at the
Circus is the dour-speaking Control,
the tendentious theorizer, analyzing
the pros and cons of cause and effect,
the means and the end, sipping
coffee or tea over a serious meeting,
discussing plans for assassinating some foe behind 'enemy lines.' Control is
preceded by the Advisor Sir Maston,
Steed-Asprey, Sparke, Terence Fielding and Jebedee,
and succeeded by Sir Percy Alleline,
who has to bear the brunt of the damage caused by a deadly mole in the Circus, amongst a stream of top-flight operatives which
include Peter Guillam, Toby
Esterhase, Jim Prideaux, Roy Bland,
Sam Collins.....
The Secret Pilgrim (1991)
was a departure of sorts when Le Carre tried a technique - somewhat of a series
of short story episodes linked to each other - where the retired Smiley
addresses the passing-out class on the closing evening of their entry course in
the Nursery at Sarratt with Ned,
formerly of The Russia House (1989),
on the eve of his retirement in attendance,
reminiscing on his days as a passing out student. Profound is the story related
by AW Hawthorne, Warrant Officer
Class-II Retd, to "Duty Officer, Major Nottingham" Smiley's nom de plume for
that day.
Le Carre has this quality
of sometimes getting one of his central stars to suddenly disappear - Leo
Harting in A Small Town in Germany (1968),
Tiger Single of the House of Single & Single (1999),
the murdered Tessa Quayle in Nairobi,
poignant as ever, right at the
beginning of his eighteenth heartbreaking opus,
The Constant Gardener (2001), where
he deals with the ramifications of the immoral aspects of the international
pharmaceutical trade.
Most of his book-endings
are tragic and unexpected. They hit you like a sledge hammer leaving you all stunned, dazed and harrowing in empathy.
Frederick
Forsyth
Frederick Forsyth's latest
hot-seller Avenger released in recent weeks catapults him into the class of his
erstwhile Jackal! His hero this time is the dexterous ex-Vietnam veteran Cal
Dexter in his early fifties.
Forsyth emerged top with
The Day of the Jackal (1971) his masterpiece which took him six-weeks to write
(an idea brooded over for 6-years) after Biafra Story,
the non-fiction account of the tragedy in the African continent.
Jackal dealt with the
brilliant plot arranged by the underground French OAS with an unknown English
mercenary to assassinate Gen. Charles de Gaulle. Forsyth was probably inspired
by Georges Watin the Limp, then aged
39, who,
after the aborted Petit Clamart plot of 22.08.62,
quietly vanished into the dense tropical rain forests of Paraguay.
Notwithstanding a pardon
extended by an amnesty law in 1968,
the former agricultural engineer from Algeria,
"the bulky-shouldered, square
jowled OAS fanatic" Watin continued to live in the South American
wilderness. He died in his home in Asuncion
of a heart attack on Sat., 19.02.94
aged 71 and buried on the following day.
Jackal was based partly on
fact, after all 31-attempts on De
Gaulle had failed (Target De Gaulle by Christian Plume & Pierre Demaret, 1973) especially the Petit Clamart one so well
retold at the beginning of the book; also related by Charlotte & Dennis
Plimmer as The Perfect Plan to Kill de Gaulle in the Reader's Digest of
July-63.
Forsyth reportedly mulls
over the plot for about 18-months,
researching for 6-months, and covers
six weeks to complete a book,
starting at 9-am reading through the previous day's work first, seven days a week typing 12-pages a day upto
1.30-pm, taking a break for lunch
and an hour's stroll in Regent's park,
returning to revise what he has written by 5.30-pm. A sheet beside him gives
one-line reminders of the content of each chapter.
Forsyth's heroes are real, dynamic men: Inspector Claude Lebel hunting the
Jackal, Peter Miller the intrepid
reporter in The Odessa File (1972),
Cat Shannon the mercenary in The Dogs of War (1974),
ex-CIA agent Jason Monk in Icon (1996),
Major Mike Martin the SAS man in Iraq in The Fist of God (1994), John Preston from MI5 in The Fourth Protocol
(1984)...
Forsyth's fifteen short
stories in No Comebacks (1982) and The Veteran (2001) are absolute stunners, especially the title stories. His treatment of a
poignant love story Whistling Wind in The Veteran is a masterpiece on America's
exciting Wild West.
Forsyth is at his best when
treating special subjects such as espionage or assassination. His sequel to The
Phantom of the Opera titled The Phantom of Manhattan (1999) is a fine treatment
of Gaston Leroux's classic turned musical by Andrew Lloyd-Weber.
Forsyth teaches the reader
via Quinn the crack Negotiator (1989) on the intricacies of protractedly
negotiating with kidnappers on an initial ransom demand of U$5-mn to close at
U$2-mn stabilizing the psychology of the kidnappers to have closed a good deal.
In The Deceiver (1991) he gives us a fine shade of Cold War realities in Sam
MacCready who is head of the DeeDee desk,
and how his deputy Denis Gaunt so characteristically defends his boss in
justifying the continuation of that desk by relating four absolutely thrilling
Cold War episodes of his boss to a high powered Committee at Century House.
JK
Rowling
Joanne Kathleen Rowling
born 31.07.51 swept the boards in recent publishing history, and brought about a momentous metamorphosis in
today's culture of reading amongst the new generation. Wizardry and hokum reign
high on the terrain.
Children so far have simply
enjoyed following Harry Potter through his five grades at Hogwarts School of
Witchcraft & Wizardry; the journey on Hogwart's Express chugging out at
11-am from the famous Platform Nine and Three-Quarters at King's Cross station;
the Quidditch games; the various spells; the final climax of HP battling and
succeeding against the forces of evil amidst a backdrop of fine fantasy and
magic.
The Good: Harry Potter, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger and members of
the Order of the Phoenix are matched against the Bad: Draco Malfoy, Crabbe and Goyle amidst the Ugly: represented in
deadly form as the Lord Voldemort "He who must not be named," alias Tom Riddle,
an erstwhile brilliant student at Hogwarts,
and his Deatheaters.
JKR writes in long hand, taking a year to complete each book. She began
writing her first book Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (1997) at
Nicolsons Restaurant in Edinburgh, sipping coffee. Writing every day, she spends eleven or twelve hours, sometimes three,
depending on how fast her ideas come.
American publishers were
able to convince her to amend the word Philosopher's to Sorcerer's in the title
owing to Americans not being too familiar with the former word. However, she insisted on the word mum over the suggested
mom! Thereafter in every successive year followed HP and the...Chamber of
Secrets, ...Prisoner of Azkaban
and...Goblet of Fire, twice as large
as its predecessor. Out of the proposed 7-set series,
her latest...Order of the Phoenix
(2003) is a mammoth 776-page read.
JKR hit the ropes in
writing, reaping such grand fortune.
Her early interest at age-9 in Fleming's James Bond novels shifted later to
Jane Austen, her favourite author.
She has a ten-year-old daughter Jessica from an earlier marriage. She later
married Dr Neil Murray in 1996. She received her OBE for services to children's
literature from Prince Charles a great HP-fan.
Apart from all the fanfare
about Potter, it must be admitted
that, amongst all writers, JKR emerges as not only an affluent author making
her millions surpassing Her Majesty,
but also a tremendously valuable contributor towards children's behavioural
patterns in reading, where she has
indirectly inculcated the good habit.
She simply got kids back
into reading books, Potter or
otherwise, to a great extent
dragging them away from being couch-potatoes across the TV!
23.Jan.2000: Mathew Peiris: From Mysticism to Murder.
Observations on AC
Alles’s book: Vol.12 Famous Criminal Cases of Sri Lanka series.
(Colombo, Aitken Spence,
1999 2nd Ed: ISBN 955-95203-4-2) (The Sunday Island
p-12)
http://lakdiva.com/island/i000123/feature.htm
The Vicarage Murders
Mathew
Peiris: From Mysticism to Murder
Book by A. C. Alles
Colombo,
Aitken Spence Printing (Pvt) Ltd., Nov. 99: ISBN 955-95203-4-2
2nd reprint soft cover edition. 218-pp. Rs. 650
Available at BOOKLAND
Some observations by Firoze Sameer
"There is no fire like
passion,
there is no shark like hatred,
there is no snare like folly,
there is no torrent like greed"
- Gautama Buddha
The second edition
of AC Alles’s account of the Vicarage murders, in his series of the Famous
Criminal Cases of Sri Lanka, has prompted me to make some relevant observations
regarding this remarkable case which is without parallel in the field of
international crime.
Beginning his
writing career on non-fiction crime in 1975 at age 64, Alles has thereafter
published on average a book in every year, and has clocked twenty-one books in
all, fourteen of which fall under his renowned Famous Criminal Cases of Sri
Lanka series. Alles, who celebrated his 88th b’day on 9.7.99, is still strong in
mind, and occasionally contributes valuable articles to the local newspapers on
important issues affecting the public interest.
In this Vol. XII,
readers familiar with the author’s inimitable style will opine that he is at
his best in recounting the grim episodes of murder in 1978-79 at the Vicarage.
Alles’s erstwhile experience in his capacity as a Crown prosecutor stands him
in good stead in his incisive analysis of this diabolical double-murder.
SEX AND MURDER
In his Famous
series, apart from cases which relate to motive of greed and jealousy, a good
number have fallen into the slot of murder with sex in varying degrees as a
backdrop. Vol. XII adds two murders into this range with Delrene Ingram and Fr.
Mathew Peiris playing sex.
Other such notable
instances are Vimala Wijewardene/Ven. Buddharakkitha in the SWRD Bandaranaike
Assassination [Vol. III}; Yvonne Stephenson/Sathasivam in the Sathasivam murder
case, Ariyawathie/Dr. Daymon Kularatne in Padmini’s pathetic poisoning case,
Pauline de Croos/Kirambakande in the senseless murder of the boy, Gothabaya
[All in Vol. IV]; Adeline Vitharne/Jayalal Anandagoda in the infamous Wilpattu
murder of Adeline [Vol. VII]; Somawathie/Neil Gunawardene in the
Galenbindunuwewa murder of Somawathie [Vol. VIII]; Rohini Dias/Nimal Fonseka in
the harrowing homicide of Chandrasekera Dias [Vol. IX]; lesser known Lilian
Margaret Perera Punchihewage Sugathadasa in the Wirawila Tank murder case [Vol.
I; three such connexions described in Vol. VI and lesser-known ones of the deadly
Dr. Alfred de Zoysa’s case [Vol. V].
REV. MATHEW PEIRIS
Vol. XII’s central
figure features the Reverend George Frederick Mathew Peiris, vividly described
as a man of many parts.
Mathew Peiris:
secondary education at the prestigious Trinity College, Kandy, and Prince of
Wales College in Moratuwa; qualified in mathematics and engineering at the
Technical College in Colombo; followed a course with the British Institute of
Engineering Technology; fellow member of the Institute of Motor Trade in
London; 2-years’ apprenticeship at Rowlands Ltd; transport officer at the Food
Dept; ground engineer in the Royal Air Force during WWII; vendor of British
Army surplus after the War; licensed auctioneer for the Mt. Lavinia Urban
Council; needlework expert participating in embroidery exhibitions; priest in
the Anglican Church; Lincoln Theological College student in the UK; ordained
deacon at St. Alban’s Abbey; appointed as assistant curate to the Church of Sir
Francis of Assisi at Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, and later qualifying to
be a priest; acclaimed as the first Anglican exorcist in Sri Lanka; Anglican
chaplain to the mental hospitals at Angoda and Mulleriyawa, the prisons and
remand gaols and the Colombo Group of Hospitals. He was also assistant to the
vicar of St. Pauls’s Church at Kynsey Road in Borella, Colombo, and later
appointed vicar after the strange collapse and comatose condition of the
incumbent vicar, the Rev. Basil Jayawardene, who died on 13.7.58; University of
Texas degree in psychiatry; qualified in a 2-year course in demonology in the
US; 20-years as vicar at St. Paul’s Church. And finally, prisoner in Death Row
at Welikade prison, awaiting execution, which was later commuted to life
imprisonment, which he served for precisely 18-years and 5-months and securing
freedom on 25.10.97. It is ironical that Rev. Peiris visited Death Row to
convert Prime Minister SWRD Bandaranaike’s assassin, Ven. Talduwe Somarama,
then 48, to Christianity and baptised him as Peter before he was judicially
hanged on 6.7.62. Rev. Peiris died at his home in Moratuwa on 12.5.98 aged 85.
THE VICTIMS: RUSSEL & EUNICE
Both victims had
been warded earlier at Durdans
Hospital at different
periods with similar symptoms, and, after having received medication, they had
recovered to normalcy. Russel had also recovered on his second admission with
similar symptoms at the General
Hospital.
The anti-diabetic
drug, Euglucon featured prominently in these ghastly episodes of remorseless
and calculated murder. When Russel was removed to the General Hospital
in a collapsed condition for the last time, they found his blood sugar level to
be zero!
Poignant is the
instance on 9.6.78: Russel lying in bed dazedly appealing to his helpless and
confused father, Alex, "Daddy, I can sleep and sleep and sleep." Then
again a week later he answers his sister-in-law, Therese Jackson who relates
that, "He does not know but when he takes the mixture and the tablets
given to him he feels drowsy." The vital elements in Therese’s evidence
for the prosecution, inter alia, contributed significantly in bringing the
accused to book. The medical evidence elicited by the prosecution through a
series of eminent doctors, especially from the renowned surgeon Dr. AH
Sheriffdeen at the trial, was damning testimony against Mathew and Delrene,
hitting the nail hard on the coffin of the two accused.
Alles deals
exhaustively with the complex murders of Russel Ingram, aged 32, on 10.8.78 and
Eunice Peiris on 19.3.79, where both the unfortunate victims eventually died at
the General Hospital. Both victims were found to be
in deep stupor and in serious hypoglycaemic condition for a few weeks and had
suffered irreversible brain damage, notwithstanding the medical treatment they
received at the hospital.
EUGLUCON TABLETS
The main features
of the prosecution case was that Euglucon tablets, a large quantity of which
was in Rev. Mathew’s possession, could have been introduced in crushed form or
otherwise into the food, or given directly, to the unsuspecting victims with a
view to drastically reduce their respective blood sugar levels, resulting in a
hypoglycaemic condition causing irreversible brain damage and eventually
pneumonia and death. Mathew Peiris, who was a diabetic, had read the book Body,
Mind and Sugar, jointly written by Dr. EM Abrahamson and a journalist, AW
Pezet, published in the US in the early l950s. But Mathew wilfully drew a red
herring across the trail by convincing almost everyone that the patients were
suffering from an islet cell tumour or insulinoma, where insulin is secreted by
tumours occurring in the beta cells of the pancreas: a very rare condition.
A MASTER OF DECEPTION
What astounds the
readers is the amazing gullibility displayed by simple folk as well as
experienced hospital staff and especially eminent medical men. Mathew’s strong
personality and the power of the cassock swayed them all. Two doctors had
issued letters of admission without even examining the patient, Russel, on the
symptoms as described over the telephone by Mathew!
This is evident
from the several instances of hypoglycaemic attacks experienced by Russel after
Mathew fed him through the nasal tube: sweating profusely, becoming restless,
pulse rate increasing, quick breathing; all within 15-minutes of such feeding.
Even oxygen had to be given to the patient to help him breathe. The strange
instances of the dextrose and saline drip being clamped, disconnected or
loosened after Mathew left the unconscious patient, and no action being taken
on such serious interference even after doctors were notified. Hospital rules
appeared to have been flagrantly flouted.
Mathew had
established himself well as an exorcist, stigmatist, faith-healer, and had
professed to possess mystical and supernatural powers. He was in the process of
writing a book titled Damn the Bloody Exorcist, which manuscript Delrene, as
his secretary, helped to type.
People from all
walks of life, especially several young married women and young girls sought
Mathew’s powers to heal their varied afflictions. The success of the use of such
powers, however, was a matter of conjecture. In exorcising such women and
girls, "they were to remove their clothes for the purpose of the exorcist
ritual and the crucifix placed on all parts of their naked bodies. Many of
these young women were naturally embarrassed but permitted themselves to be
examined.... " Several of them "never returned for the Services after
their first experience."
COURT TRIALS
The 3-Judge bench
High Court Trial-at-Bar without a jury delivered its 612-page judgement finding
both accused guilty on all 4-counts of the indictment and sentenced them to
death on 15.2.84 The death sentences were commuted to life sentences on
28.6.85.
The Court of
Appeal delivered its 101-page judgement on 12.2.88 after the appeal was argued
before a bench of 3-Judges which acquitted Delrene who was on remand since
18.7.79. Finally, the Supreme Court comprising of 3-Judges sealed Mathew’s fate
when they dismissed his appeal on 3.2.92. It was a long time indeed since
Mathew had been arrested by the CID on 25.5.79 and held in remand custody upto
that time, after which he was sent to Welikada jail.
THE ACQUITTAL OF DELRENE MILLICENT INGRAM
After having
comprehensively covered the matters relating to the degree of culpability of
Delrene, the author is surprised in the decision of the Court of Appeal in
acquitting the 2nd accused, Delrene, and concludes as follows: "It is
therefore respectfully submitted, with all due deference to the Judges of the
Court of Appeal, that they had misdirected themselves in coming to the
conclusion that Delerene did not share a common intention with Mathew Peiris to
kill her husband. It is difficult to resist the conclusion that judicial
sympathy appears to have outweighed the judgement of the Judges in acquitting
Delrene in respect of the charges relating to Russel’s death."
In this context
Alles quotes from his Vol. III in regard to the association between the Ven.
Mapitigama Buddharakkitha and Vimala Wijewardene, where he states: "When
two young lovers sleep on the same bed they do not have the time or inclination
to speak of anything else except of themselves in the happiness of their
intimacy; but when a man sleeps with his mistress it is not the words of love
that pass between them but rather more mundane affairs of everyday life and the
secrets hidden in each other‘s hearts which are freely and openly disclosed.
"
CONCLUSION
Alles aptly
concludes the account of this trial in making his observations regarding the
character of Rev. Mathew Peiris by stating that "he created history not
only in Sri Lanka
but also in the international world... " and "...his name has been
immortalised in the annals of crime in every country".
COMPLETE
WORKS: FIROZE SAMEER
BOOK PUBLICATIONS
(1) June-96:
Genealogical Table of Sri Lankan Muslims: Family Tree Data. Vol.I (with Fazli
Sameer). (ISBN 955-9470-00-0: Colombo: Authors,
1996: Library of Congress Control No. 98917268): 143pp. Asian Genealogy Website
http://www.rootsweb.org/~asiagw
(2) Nov-99: dOSSIEr COREA: A Portfolio on Crime
(ISBN 955-96740-0-5: Colombo: Author,
1999: Library of Congress Control No. 99953012): 103pp.
(2.1) Apr 3-4, 1999: Report of the
1998 Gratiaen Prize Committee for Creative Writing:
Reference to dOSSIEr COREA (Weekend Express p-23)
(2.2) 22.12.99: Insights into Criminality:
Review by AC Alles, former Actg
Chief Justice on dOSSIEr COREA (Daily News p-17)
(2.3) 20.02.00: That Journalism Course at the ‘Poly’ by Kirthie Abeyesekera.
Reference to dOSSIEr COREA (The Island p-6).
(3) 08.01.05: Mohanraj’s Apsaras Music Group - A Profile. Vol. 1: The first
thirty years: 1975-2004 (16,322-words:
Unpublished)
DIRECTORIES
(1)
01.05.97: Sam’s Directory 97: Royal College English Medium1961-Group/Royal
Primary
School
1955-60.
(2) 10.03.00: Royal College 61-Group Directory (Millennium Reunion).
(3) 11.01.06: Royal
College English Medium
61-Group Email/Mobile Phone Directory.
(4) 12.04.06: Royal
College 61-Group Email
Directory.
NEWSPAPER PUBLICATIONS
(1)
21.01.75: KPS Menon: The American Language (Daily News back-page).
(2) 05.05.79: Death of Double-O Seven: The Life of Ian Fleming, Creator of James Bond
(Observer: Saturday Magazine p-9).
(3) 20.05.79: Getting Away from it all Forever: Studies in Suicide (WEEKEND
p-?).
(4) 10.04.80: The Jackal and the July Plot: Assassination Attempts on Gen.
Charles de Gaulle and Adolf Hitler (with Qureisha Nizar) (Honey p-13).
(5) 23.03.84: Stoning to Death and Islamic Law: Death or Lashing? (OP-ED: Sun
p-6).
(6) 28.08.87: A Poser for Future Security: Grenades Blast in New Parliament (Sun
p-6).
(7) 26.09.87: Recollections of the SWRD Assassination (Daily News p-30)
(8) 28.01.88: ’62 Coup and Upsurge of Indiscipline: Officers’ Plot to Overthrow
the Ceylon
Government (OP-ED: Sun p-6).
(9) 04.02.88: JR- The Last Man In: Cabinet of The Rt Hon. DS Senanayake, PC (Daily News p-4)
(10) 27.03.88: The T-56: A Terrorist’s Best Friend (WEEKEND p-9).
(11) 22.05.88: A Day at the Montessori: How Nabila and the Tiny Tots Learn
Their Basics (WEEKEND p-20).
(12) 04.06.89: Lanka’s Indo-China Syndrome: The Difficult Task to Achieve Peace
(WEEKEND p-6).
(13)09.07.89: Sri Lanka’s
Deadly July: Fateful Month in a Nation’s Calendar (WEEKEND p-8).
(14)12.03.90: The Wizard of Scoutcraft: Royal College’s
Brevet Lieut-Colonel MKJ Cantlay,
e.d., JP. Letters from Laki
Dissanayaka (Daily News p-15).
(15) 06.05.90: Innovative Style in le Carre’s Espionage: John le Carre’s 12th
Best Seller, The Russia House.
(Sunday Times p-15).
(16) 14.07.91: At 80, it’s Travel, Typewriter & Tennis for AC Alles: The Complete
Works of a Former Judge of the Supreme Court & Actg Chief Justice (Sunday
Times p-13).
(17) 22.09.91: Apsaras Takes Wing: Music Prodigy Muthuswamy Mohanraj’s Tamil
Orchestra. (Sunday Observer p-12).
(18) 13.03.93: Lieut Col. Cantlay turns 80 (Daily News p-7).
(19) 22.05.94: The Origin of Tips: Former Hotelier Bert F Cramer Speaks to AF
Sameer (Sunday Times p2).
(20) 23.01.00: Mathew Peiris: From Mysticism to Murder.
Observations on AC Alles’s book: Vol.12 Famous Criminal Cases of Sri Lanka
series (Colombo, Aitken Spence, 1999 2nd Ed: ISBN 955-95203-4-2) (The Island p-12)
(20.1) 26.07.92?: Doctors and the Law by AC Alles: Commenting on a section of
the review (The Sunday Island p-6).
(21) 03.03.04: Reading British - Five famous modern authors: Ian Fleming/ James
Hadley Chase/John le Carré/ Frederick Forsyth/JK Rowling
(Daily News: Art Scope: p-vi).
(22) 09.06.04: Hollywood movie springs from Homer’s epics: The Iliad/The
Odyssey/Virgil’s The Aeneid/ Quintus of Smyrna’s The War at Troy.
(Daily News: Art Scope: pp-v & vi)
(22.1) 30.06.04: Sequel on Homer’s Epics by Rohan Jayawardana: Of the Aeneid, Caesar Augustus,
Jesus and Zeus (Daily News: Art Scope: p-vi).
(23) 21.07.04: Horror of Hannibal Lecter
Thomas Harris’s complete works/movies: Black Sunday/Red Dragon/The Silence of
the Lambs/Hannibal (Daily News: Art Scope: p-vii).
(24) 13.10.04: A tribute to Gamini Fonseka: Sinhala movie idol &
director/Statesman.
(Daily News: Art Scope: p-vii).
(25) 27.10.04: Brando’s Godfather revisited: Francis Ford Coppola’s The
Godfather trilogy.
(Daily News: Art Scope: p-iii).
(26) 24.11.04: Mohanraj sustains music tradition: Apsaras moves into third
decade.
(Daily News: Art Scope: p-viii).
(27) 27.08.06: The Other Side of the Sathasivam Case
A review on A Murder in Ceylon by Prof. Ravindra Fernando,
MBBS, MD,
FCCP, FCGP,
FRCP(Lond), FRCP(Glasgow), FRCP(Edin.),
FRCPath(UK), DMJ(Lond), Senior Professor of Forensic Medicine and
Toxicology, Faculty of medicine, University of Colombo.
(Colombo, Vijitha Yapa Publications,
June-2006: ISBN 955-1266-20-X: First Edition,
Hardcover 480pp). [The Sunday Times,
p4 (Books)]
(27.1) 29.07.06: Daily News p12
Expert Testimony in Sensational Murder Case Analysed:
Review by CR de Silva, PC, Solicitor General (Attorney General since
07.04.07).
(27.2) 25.07.07: Daily News p41
Courtesy The Sri Lankan Anchorman, Toronto Canada, June,
2007: (http://thesrilankananchorman.com/client/NewsDetails.aspx?ID=532).
Fascinating Book on Sensational Trial: Review by Sir Christopher Ondaatje, OC,
CBE.
(28) 30.06.07: JonBenet Ramsey – A Heartbreaking Tragedy
A review on The Death of Innocence: The Untold Story of JonBenet’s
Murder and How its Exploitation Compromised the Pursuit of Truth by
John and Patsy Ramsey (U.S., Thomas Nelson,
Inc., Mar-2000. ISBN 0-7852-6816-2:
Hardcover 396pp)) [Daily News, p23
(Book Reviews)]
(29)
25.05.08: He Lit a Flame That Thrilled Audiences Through the Ages: Ian Fleming
Birth Centenary - 28.05.08. [The Sunday Times,
p4].
(30) 20.07.08: Hollywood Plots Hitler
Thriller: The 20 July Plot. [The Sunday Times,
p4].
(31) 27.07.08: That Massacre Upon Massacre: Black July,
1983, 25th Anniversary. [The Sunday
Times, p4].
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
(1) 15.01.98:
Flesh-eating (Daily News p-20).
(2) 28.01.98: Street names (Daily News p-20).
(3) 20.02.98: Vehicle Registration Nos (Daily News p-18).
(4) 29.12.99: Chandrika’s golden chance (Daily News p-14).
APPRECIATIONS
(1)
05.09.87: Abdul Wahab Mohamed Ghouse (Daily News p-12).
(2) 13.09.88: R Muthuswamy (The Island p-7)
(3) 23.02.89: Mohamed Noor Deen (Daily News p-10).
(4) 11.09.91: MIM Sahill (Daily News p-11).
(5) 13.01.02: Rohan Hapugalle (The Sunday
Island p-13).
(6) 13.01.03: AC Alles (Daily News p-6).