![]() |
Col. James J. Searcy |
|
|
|
SHARPSHOOTER MUST READ 'Bits by Chance' It is Your Country |
![]() Maj.Gen. Sterling Price |
|
The Commander's Tent
![]() Commander
|
My fellow Confederates: As we scan the political horizon of today, the similarities drawn between our modern-day time and the political atmosphere of 1860 is more than a little disturbing. We are pledged to the Charge given us as members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans. We have pledged to defend our heritage and the time-honored moral values system for which our ancestors fought so bravely. Once again, we are faced with the bloated centralist attitude that individual states are incapable of facing and solving state problems without first bowing to an all-knowing and increasingly arrogant central bureaucracy. Individual merit and right to self-determination seems trumped by an increasingly malignant effort to trample states rights under the heel of a stubbornly arrogant and elitist central government power grab. Our ancestors were faced with hard choices; to embrace the status quo and bow to the removal of Constitutional Rights or to stand firmly upon those God-given Constitutional Rights and fight to preserve them. Unlike our ancestors, we are faced with a war of ideologies instead of bullets BUT that opposing ideology will kill us and all we stand for just as certainly as would a bullet through the heart end our physical lives. We, too, face hard choices and imminent sacrifices as we prepare to enter the ballot box later this year. May the spirit of our ancestors, coupled with the wisdom of our beloved forefathers remind us that freedom is indeed not free. We endorse no one man---it is not within the dictates of the Charge to do so BUT we DO endorse our Constitution and the spirit of liberty emanating from it. We DO remember and honor the heritage of our ancestors which time and history have shown and proven to be correct. There is nothing wrong with defending our rights and we should never ever apologize for being correct!!! Mark Stuart, Commander
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() Adjutant |
The Col. James J. Searcy Camp #1923 has voted to award special recognition certificates to Jim Lee and Mel Holdeman for their outstanding work in helping stabilize and preserve the Mt.Zion Monument. Certificates will also be mailed to Becky Anderson and Linda Matteson for their selfless dedication and hard work in helping put together the wonderful exhibit in the Boone County Historical Society.
|
by Chance ![]() First Lieutenant & Historian
|
I sent this to you in an email but I think it would be good for all members to read in the Sharpshooter.sight.
What I need to say as Historian is: We as members of the Son of Confederate Veterans need to know the fight of our ancestors still goes on. Missouri needs to be proud of our representatives who are standing strong for our States Rights. This is not partican politics. We all should support this issue. Jack
Happily, there seems to a number of state governments committed to the cause of sounding the “general alarm” of the unrepentant and unrelenting assault by the forces of the federal government on the territory of state sovereignty.
The New American faithfully has chronicled this noble resistance to tyranny as it spreads from state to state.
For example, the states of Tennessee, Montana, Virginia, and Washington have all seen the introduction of legislation requiring the governments of those states to nullify the recently enacted National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
This act, signed by the President on New Year’s Eve 2011, grants to the President the nearly unchecked power to deploy the armed forces of the United States to arrest and indefinitely detain an American citizen, whether here or abroad, suspected by the President of posing a threat to the security of the homeland. This unconstitutional enlargement of the power of the executive has the potential to rob Americans of the right to a writ of habeas corpus, the due process of law, and the right to the assistance of counsel. Thankfully, the aforementioned states are prepared to withstand this federal larceny of civil liberties.
One of the latest examples of states standing firm in the face of the fierce federal attack on the Constitution is occurring in the Show Me State.
Earlier this month, Senator Brian Nieves (R-District 26, pictured above) introduced SJR 45, a bill which would place before the citizens of Missouri the opportunity to vote on an amendment to the state constitution forbidding the legislative, executive, and judicial branches from “recognizing, enforcing, or acting in furtherance of any federal action that exceeds the powers delegated to the federal government.”
This is a bold and laudable attempt by Senator Nieves to restore the right of the state of Missouri to govern in all matters not specifically enumerated to the federal authority in the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution makes such a segregation of sovereignty clear, as well as the proper boundaries between the two governments:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Senator Nieves is to be commended for his Sisyphean tenacity in the cause of liberty. During the 2011 session of the Missouri State Legislature, the representative of Franklin, Warren, and west St. Louis Counties proposed a similar measure, SJR 15. That bill passed the General Laws Committee of the State Senate, but it was never voted on by the whole chamber.
Should Missourians vote in favor of this proposed amendment, perhaps it would embolden other lawmakers in other states to draft similar legislation and the repercussions of such aggregate acts of self-determination would alter the inertia of the growth of government, driving Washington back to the banks of the Potomac and out of the lives of every American.
Not surprisingly, there are many who ridicule Senator Nieves and his bill. The blog of the law firm of Angela L. Williams uses vulgarity (that has been omitted in this quote) to demonstrate not only a coarseness of language, but a deplorable ignorance of the Tenth Amendment and timeless principles of sovereignty. Of SJR 45, Ms. Williams’s blog declares:
This is another piece of disturbing legislation proposed by none other than List of Shame long time member, Brian Nieves. It mandates that the Missouri not recognize any federal law or court decision that in Mr. Nieves view “exceeds federal authority” Wow that is really the pot calling the kettle black, the State can exceed their authority all it wants by writing immigration laws, something that is specifically designated to the federal government in the main body of the Constitution, but any law or decision in the federal government that involve any of the following, Missouri shall not recognize or follow…and [Senator Nieves] wants to change the Missouri Constitution to express it.
Whoever authored this assessment of the proposed amendment on behalf of Ms. Williams’s law firm would be wise to reread the Constitution. Perhaps then he or she would discover that in that document the only grant of power given to the federal government regarding immigration is to "to establish an uniform rule of naturalization"; thus, per the dictates of the Tenth Amendment, any remaining power is reserved to the states and to the people.
One opponent of the bill accused the author of SJR 45 of “paranoia” and described another similar measure as a “veritable thesaurus of tenther drivel.”
Paranoia is defined as “delusions resulting from the supposed hostilities of others.” In the case of the federal government’s crusade to eliminate the sovereignty of the states, Senator Nieves and his fellows don’t qualify as paranoid as the hostilities are all too real.
Constitutionalists will find much to applaud in the text of Senator Nieves’s proposed amendment. The bill reads:
To his credit, Senator Nieves has left little wiggle room for the federal government to stick its nose in the business of the people of Missouri. In the areas of abortion, hate crime legislation, establishment of school curriculum, mandated purchase of health care insurance, submission to death panels, and formalized recognition of homosexual marriage, among others, the voters of the state of Missouri may soon be permitted to participate in Madison’s “plan of resistance” against the federal yoke.
|
the Chaplain ![]() Hughes Camp Chaplain. He writes the Chaplain's Corner which appears in the Hughes Camp monthly newsletter.
| The Holy Spirit inspired St. Paul to write that we are to “…be subject to the governing authorities.” (Rom. 13:1) Under the same inspiration, St. Peter wrote, “Be subject…to every human institution…” (I Pet. 2:13) But, what does the Christian citizen do when governing authorities, whether elected officials, bureaucrats, or judges, promulgate laws, executive orders, regulations, and judicial decisions that are clear and direct conflicts with God’s Word and violations of conscience? In 21st century America, such conflicts are becoming more numerous and pronounced. For example, innkeepers and landlords who do not wish to rent their private property to those who are engaged in relationships that can be characterized as unwed, sodomy, and miscegenation can risk being prosecuted for discrimination. Until recently, such discrimination was lauded in American culture. Those who work in privately owned pharmacies can be required to sell products that violate their religious convictions. Health care providers are increasingly experiencing requirements to participate in facilitating infanticide. Unwilling taxpayers are compelled to subsidize these procedures. Public displays of the Ten Commandments, the Cross, and our hollowed Confederate flags, that have existed for decades under the protection of the Constitution as freedom of expression, are now being dismantled and erased from traditional life in America. Attempts have been made even to file legal charges against those who proclaim the Gospel in public venues. For publicly speaking the Gospel, Sts. Paul and Silas were brought before the magistrates of the Roman colonial city of Philippi and charged with advocating “…customs not lawful for us Romans to accept or practice.” (Acts 16:21) Repeatedly, Paul experienced “…far more imprisonments, with countless beatings, and often near death.” (II Cor. 11:23) Yet, regardless of Roman law or magistrates’ decisions, he continued to obey God’s commission. Sts. Peter and John were arrested, jailed, and brought before the council that “…charged them not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus. But Peter and John answered them, ‘Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge; for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard.’” (Acts 4:18) How could both Paul and Peter, who wrote that we are to be subject to governing authorities and every human institution, by their own actions demonstrate such defiance? The answer is found in how they defined the duty of government officials. Paul said, “For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad.” A ruler is meant to be “…God’s servant for your good.” (Rom. 13:3) Peter agreed that authorities are “…to punish those who do wrong and to praise those who do right.” (I Pet. 2:14) The standard for determining right and good or wrong and bad conduct is God’s Word, which is constant and consistent, not the ever-changing pronouncements of successive government officials who are themselves subject to God’s law. If men, not God, determine what is moral, ultimately might makes right. The current movement to secularize American society and divest state institutions of Christian influence is an attempt to make the state the supreme arbiter of morality, a usurpation and abuse by civil authority not intended by God. It is not God’s intention that citizens must blindly obey government authorities, a misinterpretation that allows for potential misuse of power and the condoning of immoral deeds. As God instituted civil powers, He also gave each man personal physical and mental powers. However, as God does not approve of the misuse of our personal powers for immorality, neither does He approve of the misuse of government powers by rulers for the promotion of immorality. In America, government authority ultimately resides in the people. Our Declaration of Independence states that “…governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” The governed do not consent to a delegation of unjust powers to government. It also states that when “…government becomes destructive of these ends (God-given unalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness), it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it…” Jefferson warned, “Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes…” If, after careful deliberation of the facts and God’s Word and examination of conscience it is determined that a moral conflict exists, it is our Christian duty to follow the examples of Paul and Peter “…for we cannot but speak of (and do according to) what we have seen and heard.” Such resistance should also include the altering of government by means of personal and organized efforts to rectify moral conflicts through elections, lawsuits, lobbying, and constitutional amendments. This is the American and Christian way.
|
Words ![]() "Quantrill at Lawrence" is his 3rd book on William Clark Quantrill published in 2011 This book makes the Politically Correct version look likeSwiss Cheese
| to the Centralia Massacre
William Clarke Quantrill's favorable light is always overshadowed by the Lawrence Raid until one is able to discover the real truth behind the events that transpired before and during the raid. The same is true of William T. "Bloody Bill" Anderson and the Centralia Massacre. A Southern response has never before been written until now and in it one is able to discover the actual truth behind the event that took place before and during the so called massacre.
Following the summer of 1864 in Jackson County there were so many Union patrols scouring the Sni and Blue Hills looking for guerrillas that an effective campaign could not be launched against the Federal forces. With Confederate General Sterling Price heading northward through Missouri on his final expedition with twelve thousand men Quantrill's guerrilla bands were directed to meet him in Boonville, along the Missouri River for orders.
Arriving in Howard County by early Fall Quantrill's company was soon joined by George Todd and Bill Anderson's company. In order to nullify the Union presence in the area an attack on the Federal garrison in Fayette just north of Boonville was agreed upon. When the guerrillas lost the element of surprise the soldiers found safety behind the brick walls of the courthouse and a log embrasure used as a fort. The guerrillas fared badly losing a great number of their best men. Quantrill pulled his company back to his hideout among the rugged thickets of Boonsboro midway between Boonville and Glasgow. Todd led his company back west being chased by Federal units until he was able to counterattack. Anderson led his men eastward.
The Union garrison in Paris, Missouri, soon learned the direction the guerrillas took after the battle of Fayette on September 20. They believed the guerrillas were vulnerable and, furthermore, that a concerted effort to track them down would finally destroy them. Maj. A. V. E. Johnson, in command of the Thirty-ninth Missouri Militia, mounted around 155 men and gave pursuit. Johnson’s advance scouts ran into Anderson’s company around noon on September 26, 1864. Anderson, not wanting to bring on an attack, slipped into the darkness just outside Centralia. He rejoined George Todd’s command along with John Thrailkill’s company and other small guerrilla units camped on the Singleton farm four miles south of Centralia. Here they gathered with a combined strength of more than 225 men.
The next day, September 27, Todd’s men remained in camp. At first light, Anderson took Arch Clement and thirty men on a foray into Centralia to verify the information about Price’s movements and to get a St. Louis newspaper. At the time Centralia was a small village with about a dozen houses, only two with more than one story. The town was on a wide-open prairie. From the roof of any of the houses a person could see for miles in every direction. There were two hotels in town; the other buildings were a saloon and commercial stores. Centralia was also a stop on the rail line with a depot and a water tower. On the morning of Anderson’s mission, he and his men rudely awakened the people with shouts and pistol shots, demanding breakfast at Sneed’s Hotel. Others searched for Unionists to rob. Anderson allegedly rescued a number of civilians who were being roughly handled by his men. The railroad depot was set on fire, which were the orders given them by higher command..
When Anderson assembled his men after three hours of brazenly riding about the town, the eastbound stage from Columbia arrived. The passengers were robbed. Any conscription-aged men not in Southern service were considered suspect. After taking their time while going through the belongings of the passengers, the guerrillas heard a distant whistle announce the westbound North Missouri train from St. Charles. Anderson ordered his men to quickly pile ties on the track to halt the passing train. When the train pulled into the burning station the guerrillas immediately surrounded the cars firing their pistols into the air to discourage any resistance. There were twenty-five Union soldiers on board under the command of Lieutenant Peters of the First Iowa Cavalry including sixteen soldiers from Mexico, Missouri being escorted to St. Joseph for court-martial. They had been caught plundering the citizens living in the area of their garrison. The remainder were reporting for duty up the line and the rest were recently returning on furlough from General Sherman’s army where they had been conducting "total war" on their way through the Southern states. The Federals on board with rifles crowded the windows and the platforms and fired briskly at the guerrillas. An Iowa soldier was credited in one Union account of having fired out of the soldier’s car, setting the stage for the retaliation that followed.
Northern writers have never admitted that the soldiers opened fire on the guerrillas but the truthful account has been verified by several eyewitnesses. Guerrilla George T. Scholl, one of Anderson’s men described what happened as the train pulled into the station. “We rode into town with no intention of taking a trip around town. Sometime later a train came in filled with Federal soldiers. The company lined up outside the coach and began a fusillade. We answered and started to clean them.” Fifteen-year-old Frank Dalton riding with Anderson explained his version of the scene. “Fighting under Captain Bill Anderson, he had captured a passenger train and got a lot of money, most of which was being sent South to pay the Union troops. On the train were thirty-four Union soldiers who were being sent South to join the Union army. As the soldiers showed fight when we ordered them to leave the train, we had to dispose of them. The Yankee troops saw us and lined up to give battle." Before the firing stopped, Anderson’s men overran the train. One of the guerrillas discovered a man who had once testified against him in court. They dragged him from the crowd and shot him beside the platform. The rest of the soldiers were taken from the train and lined up alongside the tracks and questioned by Anderson.
As he looked over these Union soldiers Anderson recalled the Federal's recent actions. Union Maj. Austin King from Fayette reported that his men on September 12, killed five of Anderson’s men. One was seventeen-year-old Al Carter, who had moved his family to Howard County from Kansas City because of Gen. Ewing's General Order No. 11. The other was seventeen-year-old Buck Collins, who was foraging for food with Carter when they were cut off and surrounded at a farmhouse by twenty-five Federals looking for Anderson. They shot the two men from their saddles. After killing Carter, the Federals shot out his eyes then scalped him. Carter had long black curly hair, and the Federals believed they had killed Anderson. The atrocity only showed the deep hatred of the Union troops toward the guerrillas and the brutal deeds of which they were capable. Shortly after this engagement, a Federal scouting party of two hundred men found guerrilla James Bissett and four others of Anderson’s men in eastern Howard County. It was nine o’clock in the morning, and a strong rain began falling when the five guerrillas turned their horses from the road to seek shelter in a nearby barn. The guerrillas had removed their saddle blankets to dry and were busy oiling their pistols when a Federal patrol discovered their tracks and followed them to the barn.
With no picket on watch, James Bissett, James Wilson, Harvey Brown, Thomas Fulton, and Patrick McMacane were taken by surprise. Firing their pistols with both hands while trying to get to their horses, Bissett and Brown were shot down at the first charge. The rest although wounded pulled themselves against a tree trunk. Each man had a pistol in his hand, ready to take a few Federals with them. Fulton tried to rally the men. A round to the head killed Wilson. Fulton, wounded numerous times, hollered out a last good-bye to his comrades before he fell. McMacane was the last to fall. The Federals rushed at them still firing, riddling their bodies until they were unrecognizable. One of the attacking officers recalled, “They fought desperately before we succeeded in their killing.” The five guerrillas managed to kill thirteen Federals and wound twenty-one before being overpowered. Official reports failed to mention that the Federals scalped the dead guerrillas.
When Anderson was notified of the deaths of his men, he was visibly affected. Guerrilla Hampton Watts was present and recalled that “great tears coursed down his cheeks, his breast heaved and his body shook with vehement agitation.” Watts noted that Anderson was morose for several days afterward, planning an equitable revenge for the men he lost.
Still grieving over the recent news that some of his best loved men had been shot then scalped by Federals in Howard County Anderson told the frightened captive soldiers at Centralia. “You Federals have just killed six of my men, scalped them, and left them on the prairie. I will show you that I can kill men with as much skill and rapidity as anybody. From this time on I ask no quarter and give none.” When the soldiers protested Anderson replied, “You are Federals, and Federals scalped my men, and carry their scalps at their saddle bows. I have never allowed my men to do such things.” He then ordered Lt. Archie Clement to “muster out” the remaining soldiers. One sergeant was singled out and spared for an exchange of prisoners for one of Anderson’s men recently captured. The sixteen Federal thieves from Mexico, being sent to St. Joseph for court martial were shot along with the others. Their bodies were shipped back to Mexico for burial, one of them buried in the wedding suit of Alex Bomar, which he had earlier stolen.
After the soldiers were shot down, Anderson gathered up his men and rode back to rejoin the rest of the guerrilla band. Later that day Major A. V. E. Johnson arrived in Centralia and was told which direction the guerrillas headed. Johnson left thirty-two men behind to guard the town. He decided he would attack Anderson with the men he had left. His bravery bordered on recklessness akin to foolishness. Johnson led his men toward the guerrilla camp and an ambush. Not one of the 123 Federals who took part in the battle escaped alive.
|
Stuff Loren Reynolds
Paul R. Petersen was the Lee - Jackson Dinner guest speaker last month. He has written Quantrill of Missouri, Quantrill in Texas, Quantrill at Lawrence and Lost Souls of the Lost Township.
Petersen is a retired U.S. Marine Corps Master Sergeant and a highly decorated infantry combat veteran of the Vietnam War, Operation Desert Storm, and Operation Iraqi Freedom. He is a member of the William Clarke Quantrill Society, the James-Younger Gang Association, the Sons of the American Revolution, and the Jackson County and Missouri State Historical Societies. He received his A.B.A. from Longview Community College and attends Ottawa University. Petersen lives in Raytown, Missouri.
|
|
| Camp #1923 Meeting February 15
| Agenda
"I believe the Society luncheon will be a very good program, one the ladies will be interested in also. This program will also bring forward the families of the Confederate Veterans and the Confederate Homes.
Equally, the evening program will give a new insight into our beloved MSG. I have learned more about the MSG from Mr. Schnetzer's book than I thought I previously knew.
I believe all Missourians and interested others will find Mr. Schnetzer’s program surpassing much of our prior knowledge.
Again, there will be additional information about the Reunion at a later date. We will have a special guest from National to speak at our Div. business session. I’ll let you know soon who that is....just a little intrigue for you.
And again, we have done our best to make this affordable but to have a good time, to site visit with each other, somewhat like the good ole times when sitting on the porch and Granddad's.
If you would., please get this out to all. there will be more coming.
Thank you,
Gary"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|