Search billions of records on


This project is not part of DNA sales. This project uses   

Web space provided by, sponsored by

Please read notice in the bottom bar.

Advertisements at the top and bottom of the pages are not part of this project, 

visiting the links helps pay for the website space. 


This website has music on subsequent pages.

Please turn your volume down if needed.






Lost Colony Research Group

Genealogy ~ DNA ~ Archaeology





Research Material


Publicity on the project




Why we use them

Surname research

Alpha List 

Hatteras Surnames

Our sister group

Hatteras project Heinegg extractions Hatteras - Family Finder Project
My Interest Lists  LC-MTDNA Project Biographies of volunteer staff
LC- YDNA Project Hatteras - MTDNA Project LC- Family Finder Project
Hatteras-YDNA Project Order LC - DNA Kits Batch Numbers
YDNA Kit numbers MTDNA kit numbers

Order LC - DNA Kits

Home Site map Lost Colony Store


The Lost Colony Research Group

Genealogy ~ DNA ~ Archaeology


June  2012



Raleigh's Lost Fort Found???

By Roberta Estes 


In late breaking news, it appears that Raleigh's lost fort may indeed have been found. This story has all the elements of a good mystery, intrigue, lost clues, hidden maps, invisible ink and messages delivered long after the death of the sender - 425 years to be exact.




It's as if John White is speaking to us from the grave, revealing the secrets that he kept, or at least tried to conceal. He did a fine job of that too, almost too fine a job in fact. 

Recently a hint found on an old map may indeed tell the story of where Raleigh's mysterious fort was placed when the colonists moved "50 miles into the Maine." Or maybe, this is where they planned to go, but never went. 

Now, a clue has emerged that experts hope could help solve the centuries-old mystery of the settlers' disappearance, and lead them to the site of what Raleigh and Queen Elizabeth I hoped would be a capital, the first English attempt at colonization.


Shown on the photo above, on one of John White's maps of "Virginia" in the new world is a hint drawn in what appears to be invisible ink, further disguised by a barely-discernible patch of paper glued to it. 

Scientific tests have revealed that a lozenge, the symbol for a fort, was hidden on the map drawn by John White, who accompanied Raleigh's first attempts to establish a colony. Its concealment on the map reflects an age mired in political intrigue – Elizabeth I was then facing plots to place the Catholic Mary Queen of Scots on the English throne – and fears of such a map getting into the hands of court spies were rampant. Indeed, later, at Jamestown, a map did find its way to the Spanish, so those concerns were certainly justified. 

Invisible ink was concocted at that time from milk, citrus juice or urine, and usually revealed by applying heat. 

An official announcement was made on May 2nd, and carried at 


The Independent reported that scientific tests were conducted by the British Museum's curator, Kim Sloan, and scientist, Janet Ambers, following a request by Brent Lane, a professor at the University of North Carolina and a director of the First Colony Foundation, which conducts archaeological and historical research.

I took the segment of the map shown with the fort in the Independent and attempted to reconcile it to the John White map we are all familiar with. It's obviously not the same map. So, with a clue to one mystery, more questions are introduced. John White created two maps of the region during this period, one much more detailed than the other.



John White's second map is the one with the patch. It's obvious that this is not the same map as shown above.




On White's second map, shown above and below, the patch at the confluence of the Roanoke and Chowan Rivers is quite obvious, along with a second patch just below Paquippe, today's Lake Mattamuskeet. Stay tuned as events unfold and more information becomes available.







Contact Information: 

Electronic mail

General Information/Project Membership: 


The Lost Colony Research Group is in NO WAY affiliated with The Lost Colony Center for Science and Research.  The Lost Colony Y-DNA and MT-DNA projects at Family Tree DNA are NOT IN ANY WAY  affiliated with The Lost Colony Center for Science and Research, regardless of what their links imply.


"Please notify us of any claims to the contrary."


There is no fee to join our group and no donation of monies or objects are needed to participate in "The Lost Colony Research Group".


As with any DNA project, individuals pay for their own DNA testing, but the
group itself  - is strictly volunteer and free to join, upon approval of membership.


Neither, myself, nor the Lost Colony Research Group together or individually are  responsible for the personal content submitted by any individual to this website.


Send mail to with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2008 Last modified: May 30, 2012



The art work on this website is my (Nelda L. Percival) original art work and has not been released to any person or organization other then for the use of Lost Colony Research Group and the store front owned by the same. My art work has never been part of the Lost Colony Center for Science and Research's property. My art used here and at the store front was drawn precisely for the projects run by Roberta Estes and ownership has not been otherwise released. This project also uses the artwork of Dr. Ana Oquendo Pabon, the copyright to which she has retained as well. Other art works are the copyrights of the originators and may not be copied without their permission.
All DNA Content on this site belongs to the individuals who tested and or their representatives . The person who tested does not give up ownership of their DNA or DNA results by posting them here.
Where Copyrighted data has been cited the source has been included........
Some Native American art work is from  Some of their art was used as a bases for different creative graphics.