<< Excuse me all to pieces, but my Maiden name happens to come from Nathan
Phinney BULLOCK b. 10 Oct 1839, Ephrath, Montgomery Co, NY. He married
Jane Ann LIVINGSTON, b. 26 Oct 1844, Cobbleskill, Scohari Co, NY. The
marriage took place in White Plains, NY date and county unknown, but
first child born Herbert John BULLOCK b. 26 Oct 1867. Is this Not
pertinent to research in NY state???
[Of course the foregoing information is pertinetnt, it is not however a
reflection of your previous post on this topic, nor does it reflect the
content of the other posts]
I am looking for a marriage date, and for the parents of both Nathan
BULLOCK and Jane LIVINGSTON (who happen to be my paternal ggrandparents.
Also I do not know how many of their children were born in NY, or how
and when they (at least some of the 6 children) came to WI, when, or by
what route. I do know the names and birth/death dates of the children,
just not the Where.
[I will be happy to review materials in my library and see if I can help you]
So if you are upset, try the delete key? I am not into discord nor am I
a participant in rude flaming. Perhaps you would like to rethink your
position and comments?
[I do not need to rethink my comments, they are my considered opinion.
Insofar as rude flaming is concerned, I suggest you look in the mirror.]
in peace,
[Requires more than words. Peace is a result of actions, taken and not
taken. We all have the opportunity to achieve peace, yet so few are willing
to do what it takes to make it happen. My families motto, by the way is
"Amor et amcitia requent".]
Randy
rsahr@waun.tdsnet.com
EEVS@aol.com wrote:
> Most, if not all genealogist are aware of the expotential number of
surnames
> that identify those who are responsible for us being here today. The
> inclusion of maiden surnames for married women could or could not be
> important to others. If it makes those who have them feel better, include
> them.
>
> I, for one, do not believe further discussion of inclusion or exclusion of
> maiden surnames is warranted on a list that purports to be dedicated to
> genealogical research in New York State.
>
> Let us all get back to basics and use this and the other lists that we
> subscribe for the purpose of research.
>>