PHINEAS PAGE, born in Lunenburg, Mass.; moved to Charlestown, N.
H., when a young man; married a Miss LABAREE; after her death again married
Jane WEST; moved from there to Fairfax in 1788, and settled on the farm
now owned by Amos PRINDLE, He brought up his goods by an ox-cart, his wife
riding on horseback; died at the age of 64. His daughter Eunice, by his
first wife, first married Samuel UFFORD, and after his death Timothy OLMSTED.
She still lives, at the advanced age of 82, with her soil Samuel D. UFFORD,
upon the old homestead, settled by her first husband, and his father Shores
UFFORD, born in Bennington in 1762, served one campaign in the Revolutionary
war; was at Bennington at the time of the battle, but took no part in it,
being too young; married Susanna MERRILL, of Bennington; moved to Fairfax
in 1788; settled upon the place now owned by Hiram COOK, and afterward
changed for the place upon which his son Elijah STORY now lives. He died
in 1835, aged 73, leaving four sons, now living, viz. John, in Madrid,
N. Y.; Joseph and Elijah, in Fairfax, and Andrew, in Cambridge, Vt.
GIDEON ORTON, the son of John ORTON, was born in Farmington, Ct.;
from there he moved to Massachusetts, and afterward to New York, where
remaining a short time, he moved to Shaftsbury, Vt.; here he was married
to Phebe OATMAN ; in 1789 came to Fairfax, and located his farm where his
son Aaron ORTON now lives. He boarded the first season with Thomas RUSSELL,
Esq., his farm being three miles distant from big boarding-place. In the
spring following he moved his family to Fairfax and was soon followed by
his brother Oliver, and others of his friends. His son Aaron ORTON, was
born the first year he moved up and now lives on the old homestead where
big father struck the first blow.
HAMPTON LOVEGROVE, born at, or in the vicinity of Norwich, Ct. His
father was born in the city of London, and came to this country while yet
a young man. He married a Miss FILLMORE. -- Mr. LOVEGROVE was the only
offspring of this marriage. His mother died while he was quite young, and
his father married the second time, and a few years after this, his father
died, when his step-mother took charge of him till he was of age to care
for himself.
His grandfather FILLMORE, when young, having an eager desire to
go to sea, embarked on board a ship, sailing from New London and when a
few days out the vessel was captured by the pirates: He with some of big
comrades contrived together to effect their escape; and this they did,
killing the captain of the pirates, and several of his crew, taking the
rest prisoners, and bringing them and their vessel back into port. At the
age, of 7 years he drove a team, transporting supplies for the army of
the Revolution. He came to Bennington at an early age, where he was married
to Seviah STORY, also of Bennington; moved, to Fairfax in 1788, and commenced
improvement on the place now owned by Harmon JOHNSON; the following year
moved up his family; on this place opened the first hotel in town; a few
years after bought the tavern of Squire ENGLAND, where the Fairfax house
now stands, a part of which house is the old original tavern of Squire
ENGLAND. He kept public house here for many years, to the satisfaction
of the traveling public, and the people of the town; was the first post-master;
town clerk from 1807 till 1831, with the exception of one year which office
he declined after that period; filled many other town offices, and retained
the esteem of his fellow-citizens till his death -- July 4, 1848, -- in
his 80th year. One son, Edward LOVEGROVE, is now living in Potsdam, N.
Y.
JOSIAH SAFFORD's grandfather emigrated from Staffordshire, England,
in 1670, and settled in Ipswich, Connecticut. One of his sons named John,
moved to Norwich, Ct., with his wife, whose maiden name was Abigail MORTON,
and 5 children; -- all of whom died there except Joseph, who, in 1763,
with his family moved to Bennington, Vt. His son, Josiah, the subject of
this sketch, moved to Fairfax in 1788, and commenced his settlement; making
the first improvement in what is now called the SAFFORD neighborhood. He
was representative in the legislature in 1788, being the second representative;
was moderator of several town meetings; served as selectman, in 1790 and
'91, and died aged 85.
CAPT. ERASTUS SAFFORD, son of Josiah, was born in Norwich, Ct.;
moved with his father to Bennington, at the age of 6 years; in 1789 came
on to Fairfax, and began opening a farm south of his father's; built a
log-house, and cleared a small piece of land, and returned to Bennington
on foot -- the horse which he rode up having strayed. He married Clarissa
HOPKINS, of Bennington, the year previous to his coming to Fairfax; and
in the winter of 1791 moved his family, consisting of his wife and one
child, to Fairfax-passing down lake Champlain on the ice, to Georgia-thence,
by means of blazed trees, to his new home. He was chosen selectman the
year he moved into town; in 1792, in company with James FARNSWORTH, was
a committee for building the first bridge over the Lamoille -- $500 having
been raised for that purpose by lottery ; was chosen town clerk in 1797,
and served, with the exception of one year, till 1807 -- was chosen to
represent his town in the legislature during the years 1807, '08, '09 and
'10 -- also in 1817 and '27; was a, staunch Whig, and a man who carried
much influence in-party politics.
He opened, as has been before said, the second tavern in town, and
many of the early town-meetings were held at his house. The farm upon which
be struck the first blow is now in possession of his son, H. C. SAFFORD,
whose house is situated but a short distaste from the first log house built
upon the place. He was a finely formed man, erect in his carriage, and
in physical strength had but few equals, even in that day of strong men
-- scarcely ever knowing a sick day. Without the advantages of much schooling,
his intellect was vigorous and quick, and his fund of information large.
A hard-working and industrious man, he early acquired and held the esteem
of the citizens of his town, retained his faculties till an advanced age,
and died aged 86.
GEN. JOSIAH GROUT was born in Charlestown, N. H., June 9, 1792,
His father re-moved with his family to Charlestown, from Lunenburg, Mass.,
about the year 1766. During the Revolutionary War, he served as commissary
in the army. Josiah was his fourth son. He came to Fairfax in the year
1795, selected a location for a farm on the Lamoille, and made some improvement;
returned to N. H.; was married in Walpole, Jan. 9, 1797, to Sarah WHITE,
formerly of Leominster, Mass., and soon after returned to his home in Fairfax.
Here he pursued his avocation, a farmer; being called upon by his townsmen
to serve as selectman, lister, justice of the peace, and constable. He
was ever patriotic in the service of his country, and passed through the
various grades of militia offices, till age cleared him, In the war of
1812 he was an earnest supporter of the administration, and active in carrying
on measures for its prosecution. In the fall of 1813, by order of Elias
FASSETT, Brigadier General, he was called upon to take command of a regiment
of militia, as Major, and march to the border of Canada, to protect the
frontier from the raids of the enemy. He was stationed successively at
Chazy, Chateaugay, Cumberland Head and French Mills. Under this call he
served 3 months -- "cheerfully participating in every hardship and danger,
and discharging every duty to the satisfaction of all concerned" -- for
which service he afterwards received a warrant of government-land.
In Sept. of 1814, when the British were approaching Plattsburg,
he voluntarily shouldered his gun and knapsack, and hastened to the field
of action, and was soon after chosen captain of a company of volunteers.
With this company, he soon engaged with a company of British, in which
the British Captain and several of his men were killed, and the remainder
taken prisoners and marched into camp, In 1815 be was appointed Colonel
of the second regiment of militia; in 1818, as appears by the journal of
the Assembly of the State, was elected a Brigadier General. It reads as
follows:
“The ballots
being taken, sorted and counted, for a Brigadier General in the third Brigade
and third Division, of the Militia of this State, in the room of Gen. John
WINES, resigned, it appears that Josiah GROUT was duly elected." |
He accepted and held the office till 1823, when he resigned, and
was succeeded by Samuel FAIRBANKS, of Georgia, who 2 years after, was succeeded
by James FARNSWORTH, of Fairfax. He was a good citizen and neighbor, respected
by all, He had a vigorous constitution, and enjoyed good health till the
summer of 1852; when, being attacked by paralysis, he lingered till Jan.
9, 1853, when he died, in his 81st year. He left one son, a preacher of
the gospel in Michigan, and three daughters.
JUDGE JOSEPH BEEMAN was born in Warren, Ct. His father, Joseph BEEMAN,
sen., married in Warren, Catherine DURKEE, by whom he had 10 children.
He moved, in the early settlement of the State, to Bennington: in 1786,
he and his son, Judge BEEMAN, came to Fairfax; and, branching out from
the river settlement, made a; pitch about 10 miles from Capt. Broadstreet
SPAFFORD. This was the first improvement in North Fairfax. Joseph BEEMAN
was 23 years of age at the time, he commenced life as a farmer which occupation
be carried on, either personally or by hiring, till his death, upon the
farm which he first settled. He built the first cider-mill in the place,
and many barrels of this beverage of the settlers found its way to the
neighboring towns, he also studied surveying, about the year 1800, with
Judge Amos FASSETT, of Cambridge, and was employed in this profession,
more or less, till old age incapacitated him. He traced out the old division
lines of Fairfax, Cambridge, Westford, Georgia and Fairfield, and run the
town-lines of many towns in Franklin Co; was employed by many of the town
proprietors to look after their rights, and to sell them to the best advantage;
became, from his knowledge of the country, a large proprietor of excellent
land: in 1806 moved to the village, and built the first saw-mill and grist-mill
upon Great Brook which did a goodly amount of business, and which were
known for a long time as Beeman's Mills. About this time he was appointed
surveyor-general, which office he held till 1813, when the federal party,
being in the ascendant, turned out of office all not of their party, and
Mr. BEEMAN, being a strong democrat, was dropped. On Sept. 10, 1813, he
met the commissioners at Bennington, to fix the boundary-line between Vermont
and New York, which business required his presence till Oct. 8th, following.
Concerning his connection with the battle of Plattsburgh, I give his own
words, from a journal kept at that time:
“Friday,
6th of Sept, 1814. Attended freemen's meeting. Went this night to Plattsburg
got there just at daylight. The British had besieged the place.” |
The freemen's meeting of which he speaks, was broken up by the news
of the enemy's advance upon Plattsburg. Some started immediately for the
scene of action. Others went home for their guns and knapsacks, and followed
the next morning.
"Wednesday,
Sept. 7. Was at Plattsburg this day. Went with a sloop to Grand Isle, and
brought from there 123 volunteers to camp -- thence proceeded to Salmon
River, in the night. Staid in the vicinity till the 11th, which was the
memorable day on which the battle of Plattsburg was fought, on the lake,
and by the land forces. Monday, 12th -- -Followed the retreating enemy
toward Lake Champlain, and returned to camp at night." |
He returned home on the 13th, and on the 14th went back to Grand
Isle, to look up a horse which be had lost. On the 16th returned to Plattsburg,
and viewed the fleet, both American and British ; and the next day searched
for cannon, supposed to have been thrown into the creek by the British.
He was Captain of a company during this time, but his roll is lost. In
1818 or '20 he was appointed Judge of the County Court; represented his
town in the legislature during the years of 1800, '01, '02, '03 and '04;
also in 1821-being a strong democrat and carrying much influence in politics.
He was frequently called to preside in town meetings, and to fill the various
town offices; and was frequently appointed administrator to settle estates.
He married Nancy MERRILL, of Bennington, in 1793, by whom he had a family
of 8 children, only 2 of whom are now living.
His brother, Beriah BEEMAN, who moved into town at the same time,
is yet living, the oldest inhabitant of the town. He came in at the age
of 7, and is now 81. Their descendents yet living in town are numerous.
JUDGE JOSEPH D. FARNSWORTH, M. D., was born in Middletown, Ct.,
Dec. 22, 1771. His father was assistant commissary in the Revolutionary
War, and was sent to Vermont, being the first commissary in the State.
His great-grandfather was a physician in Connecticut. The mortar which
he used is now in the possession of J. H. FARNSWORTH, M. D., of Fairfax,
his descendant in the direct line. His father moved with his family to
Bennington during the Revolution, whilst he was quite young. Here he attended
school at the academy, remaining till he returned to Middletown, whore
he studied medicine with Dr. OSBURN. Having finished his studies he located,
and commenced practice, in Plattsburg, N. Y., at the age of 18, where he
remained about a year. He then removed to Vergennes, Vt., where he remained
about the same time, when he again moved to Pownal, and from there to Fairfield,
in 1795, where he remained in practice of his profession till 1824. He
moved that year to Charlotte, where he was engaged in practice till 1836,
when be moved to St. Albans, where he remained 3 years, and then settled
in Fairfax, locating in the village. He was appointed judge of the county
court, in 1804, .and served for 20 years, holding one court in St Albans
after his removal to Charlotte, returning for that purpose. He was holding
court, Sept. 11, 1814, when the boom of the cannon at Plattsburg announced
that the fight had begun. He adjourned the court and departed for the scene
of action; volunteered his services as surgeon, was accepted, and served
for 4 days in that office.
He was town clerk in Fairfield for nearly 20 years, retaining the
office till he left; represented that town in the legislature for 20 years,
and attained the reputation of a sound and able legislator; was often called
to preside over meetings of a benevolent and religious order, and was widely
known for his benevolence towards such enterprises. He was a man seemingly
almost incapable of fatigue. His ride as a physician extended through the
neighboring towns. He would attend court at St. Albans, and on his return
visit his patients, during the night, taking bat a few hours of sleep.
He amassed a fortune by his energy, which placed him among the wealthy
men of his section, and died in 1857, being 85 years and 9 months of age.
He has two sons living at the present time, J. H. FARNSWORTH, M. D., in
Fairfax, and Joseph A. FARNSWORTH in St. Albans.
HON. DAVID OLMSTED, the son of Timothy and Eunice OLMSTED, was born
in Fairfax, in 1822. He and his, brother Page were the only issue of the
second marriage of Timothy OLMSTED and Eunice UFFORD, the widow of Samuel
UFFORD, and daughter of Phineas PAGE, one of the oldest settlers of the
town. The only advantages of education he received were the common schools
of 35 years ago. At the age of 16 he moved to the West, and stopped the
first season at Mineral Point, southern Wisconsin, and engaged in lead
mining. Whilst stopping here the hotel, at which he boarded, took fire
during the night; discovering the flame, he threw himself from the chamber
window and aroused the inmates. Everything he possessed was destroyed,
and he found himself naked as he sprang from his bed. He however found
friends, who supplied him with clothing, and he again commenced to work
his way to fortune.
In the following December, 1838, he, with his brother Page, who
had gone out in the fall, removed to Prairie du Chien, Wis., where they
found employment till the next spring. July, 1840, they started again on
foot to look up a new home on the west side of the Mississippi, having
purchased blankets, cooking utensils, and provisions. They went west about
50 miles into the Winnebago country, to where Government was building a
fort, now Ft. Atkinson, Ia., but soon returned to what is now Monona, Ia.,
and selected a claim, cut logs, and backed them a short distance, and erected
the first cabin in Monona, They were the only white inhabitants at that
time, and for the next 8 months in that township; nor were any nearer,
then on the east, than 6 miles ; on the south 15 miles, and none west or
north, to the Pacific and British Possessions, except a few government
soldiers and employees. This place was 13 miles west of the Mississippi,
2 miles south-east of the lands belonging to the Indians, and 2 1/2 miles
from an Indian village. The cabin they built contained two rooms where
they commenced trading with the Indians, and continued in trade two years,
when they threw it up, and each selected another claim adjoining the first.
Two years after this, David OLMSTED sold out his claim, and again removed
to Ft. Atkinson, where he engaged in the Indian trade with W. G. and G.
W. EWING, who were heavy Indian traders, and obtained a wonderful influence
over the tribe. When the convention was called to form a state constitution
for Iowa, in 1846, he was chosen delegate for Clayton county, and occupied
a prominent position in that body ; during the Mexican war he raised a
company of volunteers, of which he was chosen lieutenant: this company
was stationed at Ft. Atkinson to supply the place of the regulars: in 1847,
in company with Henry C. RHODES, he purchased the interest of the Messrs.
EWING in the Indian trade with the Winnebagos; in 1848, this tribe being
removed to Long Prairie, Minnesota, he accompanied them, and it was mainly
owing to his exertions, that their removal was accomplished peaceably;
in June, 1848, the Winnebagos, leaving Ft. Atkinson, for Wabashaw Prairie,
and tearing the climate of their selected home, and making a treaty with
old Wabashaw, for a part of his domain, and refusing to proceed farther,
and remaining here 6 weeks awaiting instructions from the government, by
using his influence, he prevailed upon them to comply with the wishes of
their great father at Washington. The Indians always called him the "good
man.“ Established at Long Prairie, he endeavored to open a shorter route
to Sauk Rapids, where their supplies were obtained. Taking with him an
old French voyager, he proceeded on horseback with but two days' provisions.
Toward evening of the second day they perceived that they were lost, and
therefore dismounted, hung their saddles upon the trees, turned their-horses
loose, and determined to strike across through the network of lakes swamps
and aspen thickets, on foot. They soon found their trials had but just
begun. The remnant of provision was soon gone. They had pistols, but their
powder they were obliged to save for kindling fires. The Frenchman managed
to catch two small sun-fish, and a frog, their only food the seven days
they were lost after leaving their horses. The Frenchman became partially
deranged, and it was with much difficulty that he could be governed, but
Mr. OLMSTED pressed on, knowing it was his only hope, and at the end of
the ninth day they emerged from the wilderness, and stood on the banks
of Sauk river, where they met a friend in search of them from the Rapids.
The Frenchman died 6 months after, and OLMSTED's constitution received
a shock which was the foundation of that insidious disease which brought
him to an early grave.
On his return to Long Prairie, he was elected member of the first
legislative council of the territory of Minnesota, at its session in St.
Paul; he was chosen its president, which position he occupied with marked
ability for 2 years, and in 1853 gave up the Indian trade to the regret
of his many red friends, and removed to St. Paul; bought the Minnesota
Democrat, then started about one year, which he edited with marked ability.
He started the first- daily paper in Minnesota. His opposition to the charter
of government, granting lands to the old N. W. Railroad which, on the part
of corporations was a grand fraud, caused Congress to repeal the law, and
the agents of the company, finding they could not control him, bought out
his press. He was elected mayor of St. Paul in the spring of 1854, upon
her first municipal election, over older residents; in 1855 moved to Winona,
then a village of 25 houses, became fully identified with her every enterprise,
contributed much to her prosperity, and in July, 1855, his many friends
in the territory requested him to run as delegate to congress. His opponents
were H. M. RICE, democrat, and W. R. MARSHALL, republican. H. M. RICE was
elected, yet the canvass added much to his reputation as an honest and
high-minded man. His health now, which had been failing for some time,
induced him. to spend the winter of 1856 and '57 in Cuba and the Isle of
Pines. He was accompanied by his nephew, N. B. UFFORD. He seemed to receive
some good, and in the fall of 1857 started again to visit them, but on
arriving in Fairfax, where his mother resided and many friends, he was
prostrated so as to be scarcely able to leave his bed -- and yet he lingered
over three years. During his sickness he watched, with anxious solicitude,
the disturbed condition of our country, but left before the storm, which
was then threatening, burst in its fury. Firm in his principles, he began
political life a democrat, and ended by being a republican, was never a
partisan, but always a patriot. He died Feb. 2, 1861, and was buried in
the cemetery of St. Albans. His wife was a daughter of Judge STEVENS of
St. Albans, and, with two children, survives him.
P.P. OLMSTED, ESQ., brother of the former, settled with him in Monona,
where be now resides. He was elected justice of the peace in 1841. At that
time, his jurisdiction extended north to the British possessions, and west
to the Missouri river. The population, at that time, consisted principally
of Indians and soldiers, the inhabitants proper being about 250 (now over
20,000.) There were several thousand Indians, and, as justice, he was several
times called upon to hold examinations, where some of them were charged
with murder. In 1843, he was summoned by Capt. SUMNER (now General under
MCCLELLAN), to hold examination of three Indians, charged with the murder
of two men named FAGARDEN and ATWOOD; also two children of FAGARDEN, about
20 miles S. E. of Ft. Atkinson. He committed them, and afterward two of
the Indians were found guilty, and sentenced to be hung. In 1844 he held
another examination of an Indian charged with murdering a man named ARCHY,
and again, in 1846, of another Indian charged with murdering a man named
Riley, 2 1/2 miles from his house. He was justice till 1856, with the exception
of one year; was postmaster in 1849, and is now a member of the board of
county supervisors for Clayton Co.
There he died in the month of January, 1863, the two oldest persons
in town, viz. Mrs. STICKNEY, mentioned in the sketches sent you by Dr.
BRUSH, and Mr. DANFORTH of North Fairfax, mentioned in my MS. This leaves
Mr. Cyrus WELLS the oldest person now living in town.
LETTER,*
Of MR. UFFORD.
Fairfax,
July 7th, 1862.
Dear Miss
Hemenway:
The limit which you allowed me to finish my chapter of town history, has
been exceeded by a few days -- for which I must ask your pardon. I have
spent some 4 weeks, in collecting and collating the materials, and I found
it much more of a task than I anticipated. I worked upon it the 4th, hoping
to get it ready to go out Saturday, but could not. I did not-feel much
like work nor play. I had great fear that our armies before Richmond had
been cut to pieces, and, do the best I could, a heavy cloud would settle
over my spirits. I hope we have heard the worst, -- if so, there is yet
a chance to retrieve our disaster. I wished to go in the 9th, but the duty
of finishing my work for you held me back, and now that it is finished
I feel at liberty once more.
I have two brothers in the army -- one in the brave old 2d, the other in
the Cavalry. -- Both have seen hard service and yet they are willing to
endure and suffer for the perpetuity of our glorious Government, more free
than the world has ever before seen. I feel a pride in my native State,
that when nearly every heart is wrung by the fear of the loss of near or
dear friends, she still sends forth her sons to the battlefield. Mothers
and sisters hide their anguish and bid sons and brothers go forth, -- the
maiden kisses her lover and tells him, his country first, -- fathers cheer
up their sons by telling them of the immortal deeds of those who first
fought for independence, Amid such scenes as this it has been hard for
me to bring my mind to the task of writing history. I too have had labor
to perform -- the harvest of men taken out of the State has weakened the
force left at home, and those here must work harder to make up the deficiency,
so if our brave soldier-boys should return they would find full garners
to welcome -- for, though the loving words of friends would be dear, we
can imagine how the imagination would wander to the pantry after a long
campaign, deprived of the luxuries of home.
Early in the spring I passed over town, looking up the few old people yet
living who participated in its first settlement, but they were mostly gone.
The few that remained were getting old. They remembered a few things, but
they were disconnected. I searched the town records and verified their
statements. I obtained hints of other things, and by refreshing their minds
a little their memory came back -- the cobwebs of years were brushed off,
and they were as bright as ever. So have I worked. At last, having it nearly
completed, I have read it to several, and asked them to point out errors,
if any should strike their minds. With the corrections, I have re-written
from my notes, and the manuscript, as I send it, I judge to be correct.
Use it as you see fit.
I have looked around for a canvasser, but have not obtained one. The men
are all too busy in these busy times, and the girls are afraid to undertake
the work. I would recommend you to write to Miss Pamelia A. ALFRED, Fairfax,
giving her your terms and requesting her to act as agent. I think this
should be the ladies' work, and I believe she would do it well. If you
wish one in different parts of the town, I would recommend Ellen STORY,
North Fairfax, and Frances BUCK, Buck Hollow.
Wishing you all the success your noble enterprise demands, I subscribe
myself your friend,
John UFFORD
[* We seldom
give a letter, but this young man died so soon after, and the letters shows
so noble a heart, we cannot refrain from giving it alliteration. It is
an unconscious auto-biography, dearer than any biography. -Ed,] |
JOHN
UFFORD.
FROM
MRS. G. H. SAFFORD
John UFFORD, our town historian was a son of Albert UFFORD, born
in Fairfax, July 18, 1834. His early years were spent on his father's farm
and in acquiring what education a district school could afford. At the
opening of the N. H. Institution in Fairfax, he entered as a student, where
he remained, -with the exception of an occasional term, spent in teaching,
until he graduated, He was possessed of more than ordinary intellectual
ability, which being connected with a strong will, enabled him to overcome
all obstacles to a thorough education. On entering the institution, he
connected himself with the Social Fraternity, one of its literary societies,
where he soon became a very efficient member, doing much to strengthen
the society, and benefit his fellow students.
As a speaker, his ideas were original, and his arguments clear and
to the point, always giving him an attentive audience. He was sincerely
in earnest in whatever he attempted, and soon became an example of thoroughness
to those by whom he was surrounded. -- Prof. UPHAM in speaking of Mr. UFFORD
as a student, said, that he always made circumstances conform to his will.
He graduated with honor, and soon after removed to the West, purposing
to enter the legal profession. He was offered a situation in the office
of a well established lawyer, in Dubuque, Iowa, but was obliged to decline
on account of poor health, much to his regret. The Western climate not
agreeing with him, he returned to Fairfax, and in the fall of 1860 accepted
a situation as principal of a government school in Canada, where he met
with good success.
On the breaking out of the Rebellion, he came home with the intention
of enlisting in the service of his country; but finding that a brother
had already entered the service, he returned to Canada, and completed his
engagement. He was an earnest patriot, and in the fall of '62 enlisted
in the 11th Vermont, and did much to obtain recruits. On the mustering
and inspection of the regiment, however, on account of a slight physical
defect he was not accepted, which was a great disappointment to him.
Soon after returning to Fairfax he became interested in Miss Hemenway's
efforts to give to Vermont a permanent History, and entered with energy
on a preparation of the history of his native town. He spent much time
and labor in collecting materials and preparing an authentic history.
In the spring of '63, he was attacked with typhoid fever, which
caused his death, June 26, 1863, in his 29th year. Though his death occurred
at a time when mourning was general, his loss was deeply felt by his friends
and townsmen.
JOSIAH
BRUSH.
BY DR.
A. G. BRUSH.
One of the oldest and first settlers of North Fairfax, was Josiah
BRUSH, one of the volunteers at the battle of Bennington. He resided at
the time near Bennington, but after. wards moved to Castleton, at the head
of Castleton Pond, and kept a public-house for about 10 years, when he
removed to Fairfax, and kept the first public-house in the north part of
the town where he remained nearly 35 years, when he once more removed to
Swanton, where he died in 1832, aged 91 years. He raised a family of 5
boys and 4 girls. When war was declared with England, in 1812, he ordered
his 5 sons, Joshua, Smith, Josiah jr., Epenetus and Jonathan to at once
enlist, whereupon they all obeyed, and served their country with honor.
Josiah was 1st Lieutenant, and when the militia was called, warned
out the company and marched for Burlington, Oct. 5,1813, and thence to
Cumberland Head, and then to Shergrea, N. Y., where they served till winter,
when Lieut. BRUSH was taken sick. He was brought home and was confined
to his bed for 2 years. At the close of the war he received a discharge
from ever being obliged to do military duty again. He and his wife are
the oldest couple now residing in town. He was born in Castleton in 1784.
His wife, Sarah ELDREY, was born at New Haven, Ct., in 1786; moved to New
Haven, Vt., about 1794, and in 1804 came to Fairfax to teach school in
a log school-house near Aaron ORTON's place, riding horseback, 55 miles,
through woods and fording streams, which journey she accomplished in a
day. She taught the school and completed the above journey two more successive
years, when in 1807, she was married to Josiah BRUSH and has ever lived
in said town, and at the present day is able to do her own housework. She
is mother to 8 living children, grandmother to 41, and great-grandmother
to 6, making 55 in the Josiah BRUSH family at the present time (1862.)
Since the battle of Bennington the number of descendants from Josiah Brush
is 371.
I have also a history of about 400 names of revolutionary soldiers;
of about 4000 of the soldiers of 1812, and of 1000 who were engaged in
the Canadian frontier disturbance, April 4th-19th, 1839.
THOMAS STICKNEY, one of the old soldiers, who was born in Haverhill,
N. H., in 1755, and who served in New Hampshire 3 years, lives here and
can read and write without "specks." He is aged 96 years, and is the only
revolutionary soldier now living in the county (1862). He married Eunice
WILLSON. The following is a schedule of his property in 1820:
One cow,
....................................... $15.00
Six Sheep,
......................................... 6.00
One shote,
........................................ 2.70
One calf,
............................................1.50
One yearling
steer, ......................... 8.00
Six old
chairs, ................................... .75
One pair
old fire, dogs, ..................... .50
One cast-iron
nail hammer, ............ .25
One old
plough,................................ 1.50
One old
desk, ................................... 2.00
One ax,
................................................. .75
One hoe,
............................................... .50
$37.45
Appraised
by us this 11th of July, 1820.
JOSEPH BEEMAN,
ASA WILKINS |
|
BAPTIST
CHURCH IN FAIRFAX
BY REV. L.
A. DUNN
The settlement commenced in 1783 at first progressed very slowly,
and it does not appear that any professedly pious persons came into town
until the spring of 1790, when Mr. John CRESSEY, member of the Baptist
Church in Bath, N. H., joined the settlement; and about the same time also
Mr. Josiah SAFFORD and Mr. Stephen CHURCHILL and their wives came into
the town. These were professedly pious persons, and in a little log-house
about one mile north of the village, near the present residence of Mr.
Albert UFFORD, they commenced public worship. On a beautiful sunny Sabbath
in June, 1790, the silence of the primeval forest was broken in upon by
the voice of prayer and praise. Mr., CRESSEY conducted the services, and
his son James constituted the choir. In 1793 Mr. Elisha ANDREWS, a licentiate
of a Baptist church, came to reside in town, and during the summer preached
on the Sabbath. On Oct. 3d, 1793, he was ordained. The services were held
in the open air -- he kneeling on a little flat rack near the late residence
of Dea. Silas SAFFORD.
In September, 1793, the church, consisting then of 25 members, was
organized about one mouth prior to the ordination of Mr. ANDREWS, whose
salary was provided for in the following manner; Dea. THURSTIN engaged
to board Mr. ANDREWS and wife; other members of the church agreed to furnish
their clothing and $5 in money to purchase books. The year was a very prosperous
one; 45 were added by baptism. At the close of the year Mr. Andrews left,
for what reason does not now appear. The records of the church from this
period to March 21, 1806, are lost. It is however quite probable that during
this time, by deaths, removals and other causes, the church had well nigh
become extinct.
In the autumn of 1801, Ephraim BUTLER, a young man and a young convert,
came into the place and commenced visiting from house to house. In 1806
an interesting revival was enjoyed, sad 65 added by baptism, and Mr. BUTLER
was licensed, and has been permitted to preach the gospel for more than
half a century. He is still living, (March 1861.) July 29th, 1806, the
church voted to give Rev. Amos TUTTLE a call to become their pastor. This
call was accepted, and Aug. 7th, 1806, he waS installed, Isaac SAWYER,
Samuel CHURCHILL, Samuel HOLMES, Joseph CALL and A. CROSSMAN taking part
in the services.
We find nothing specific in relation to the salary, until Nov. 16th,
1809, this report of a committee:
“The committee
report that the church pay Elder TUTTLE two hundred dollars in the following
articles, viz: $20.00 worth of pork. 15.00 worth of beef, 5.00 worth of
tallow, 15.00 worth of rye, 10.00 worth of wool, 25.00 worth of wheat,
10.00 worth of flax. The remainder to be paid in articles convenient for
the church. E. SAFFORD, Samuel CRESSEY, committee. Voted to accept the
report." |
On the 13th of Sept., 1806, Stephen HOLMES and Asa WILKINS were
chosen deacons. Here is one of the brightest days in the history of this
church. During the year, 14 had been added by baptism; the labors of a
young and talented minister had been secured; two able and efficient deacons
bad been chosen; but, bright as was the day, a long dreary night followed.
For the next 6 years the church book presents but little else than the
record of church labors, church trials and church exclusion. Only one baptism
is reported during these years. Their young pastor, it would seem, had
great faith in church discipline, and they seemed disposed to make a pretty
thorough trial to ascertain what-virtue there might be in pruning. In addition
to a great number of offences of a personal character, for which persons
were labored with and finally excluded, there were several points of more
general interest that came under the cognizance of the church during this
period. First, the question whether a minister should receive a stated
salary was fully discussed in church meeting, and resulted in the exclusion
of one of the deacons and the dismission of the other from the duties of
his office. And then a political society known as the Washingtonian Society
-- its merits had to be discussed, and resulted in the exclusion of 10
members. The question whether a minister had a right to vote was also proposed
and fully discussed. The pruning process, in a ward, was carried to that
extent that they found it difficult to obtain their pork, beef, tallow,
rye, wool, wheat and flax, according to the stipulation of the committee,
and therefore their minister was dismissed in 1812.
For the next 5 years, from 1812 to 1817, the church was destitute
of a pastor, and for about four years they continued the work of disciplining
their members.
In the summer of 1816 an interesting revival of religion commenced
in a district school taught by Miss Sophia STONE, now Mrs. SAFFORD, and
in the course of a few months 24 were baptized into the church. In April,
1817, while the revival was still in progress, Rev. Mr. TUTTLE returned
on a visit to the people of his former charge. Arrangements were soon made
for him again to settle as the pastor of the church, and he at once entered
upon the duties of his office, and for the next three years the work of
church discipline was prosecuted with all due earnestness, nearly every
church-meeting was occupied with a church trial.
Under date of June 10, 1820, we find the first record of the famous
controversy on baptism that for a time threatened to destroy the Baptist
church of Fairfax. The pastor, Rev. A. TUTTLE, and a large number of the
church, it seems, contended that no baptism was valid unless administered
by a regular Baptist minister. From this view others dissented, and contended
that if a believer was baptized or immersed by a regularly ordained minister,
on profession of his faith, his baptism was valid baptism, though the minister
might be a member of a denomination other than Baptist, After many mouths
discussion the question was brought to a test vote June 10, 1820, and by
a small majority the church voted to sustain the views of the pastor and
his associates. A vote was then passed directing the moderator to admonish
those who in opinion dissented from the majority. And at a meeting held
July 14, 1820, a motion was made to withdraw the hand of fellowship from
those who had been admonished. The church however voted not to withdraw
the hand of fellowship, a few that first voted with the majority not being
prepared for such extreme measures. At this stage of matters 33 members,
including the pastor, the deacons and the clerk, left the church and established
a meeting by themselves; and at a meeting held by the church August 11,
1821, these 33 members were excluded, and this day was undoubtedly the
darkest day the Baptist church in Fairfax ever witnessed. A bare majority
of names remained on the old platform; but 33 of their number, including
all the officers of the church, stood as excluded members. The church however
sustained their meetings, Rev. Ephraim BUTLER preaching for them about
one half of the time for some four years. Feb. 22, 1825, of the number
excluded 22 returned to the church, and made a satisfactory confession,
and were restored to the fellowship of the church, and an interesting revival
of religion followed. But though most of the seceding members had been
restored to the fellowship of the church, yet it soon became apparent that
the cause of the difficulty had not been removed, and the baptismal question
continued to be much agitated both in public and private. A remonstrance
bearing the names of 25 of the persons who had before seceded and had been
restored in February, 1829, was presented to the church, and this opened
the whole subject anew, and after much discussion, June 6th, 1829, the
church withdrew the hand of fellowship from the 25 who had signed this
remonstrance. Nov. 19, 18.31, three of these members returned and made
a most humble confession, and were restored to the fellowship of the church.
Others soon followed, and before the close of 1832 nearly all of the seceding
members bad been restored, all in turn giving a solemn pledge that they
would never again agitate this question to the grief of the brethren.
In 1830 Rev. Jeremiah HALL, D. D., then residing in Westford, but
now president of Denison University, Granville, Ohio, commenced preaching
with this church one half of the time, and was instrumental, to a considerable
extent, of effecting the reconciliation as above.
Thus ended one of the most serious difficulties that ever disturbed
the peace of this church. This was on "spurious baptism" as licentiate,
commenced his labors with the seceding party termed all baptisms not performed
by regular Baptist ministers, and commenced in private circles as early
as 1819. In 1920 it was brought into the church, and before the close of
the year the church divided, the seceding party established a separate
meeting, and the church remained in a divided state for some 13 years.
During this distracted state of the church other denominations gained ground,
and prejudice against the sentiments of the Baptists took deep root, and
the denomination lost ground, which after the labor of years they have
not been able fully to regain. At this point in our history we take leave
of Rev. Amos TUTTLE. His record as now given will fail to do justice to
his memory without a few additional facts. It is true he was not very successful
in building up this church, but it must not be inferred that he was not
a sound theologian and an able preacher. His views of baptism were evidently
a little in advance of the denomination, but on all other points of Scripture
doctrine as believed by Baptists, his views were regarded not only sound
but remarkably clear. He was regarded by those who knew him best as a true,
warmhearted friend, an affectionate and faithful pastor, and as a most
powerful preacher. He was open and frank and conscientious almost to a
fault. The clearness of his conception, the soundness of his logic and
the readiness of his utterance made him popular with the masses, while
the integrity of his heart, the purity of his life, and the sincerity of
his friendship bound him very firmly to the heart of his friends. He was
ever a warm advocate of correct church discipline, to this subject he gave
much time and thought, and perhaps in his day there was no man in the denomination
that had clearer or more correct views of this subject than he possessed.
Blending with this superior knowledge, quick perception, sound reason and
ready utterance, he was qualified in an eminent degree to manage difficult
cases of church discipline. And the great error of his life was undoubtedly
in using this special talent a little too freely. He did not make sufficient
allowance for the weakness of human nature, but seemed to think that by
proper discipline or pruning a church could be reared not having "spot
or wrinkle or any such thing."
In July, 1832, Mr. J. C. BRYANT, then a licentiate, commenced his
labors with the church, and labored with much acceptance for several months.
Near the close of 1833 Rev. Isaiah HUNTLEY engaged to supply the pulpit
one half the time. His labors were quite successful, peace and harmony
were restored, an interesting revival enjoyed, and the church strengthened.
May, 1837, Rev. Simeon FLETCHER commenced his labors with this people and
remained some two years. During this time nothing of special interest appears
on the record. The work of church discipline was still carried forward
with considerable earnestness, though not quite equal to former years.
The church had also suffered severely in numbers owing to the spirit of
emigration, till by deaths, removals, and exclusions, the church had become
very much reduced.
Oct. 2., 1839,
Rev. C. W. HODGES commenced a series of religious meetings, which continued
about two weeks and resulted in much good. In the course of about ten months
3l were baptized.
In May, 1840, Rev. H. D. HODGE accepted a call from the church to
become their pastor and entered at once on the duties of his office. Nov.
4, 1840, Rev. C. W. HODGES commenced another series of meetings, and in
a few weeks 16 were baptized. In August, 1842, Rev. H. D. HODGE resigned
his pastorate charge. During the period he served the church their numbers
were greatly diminished by removals, but yet his labors evidently, under
God, accomplished much good. The meetings of the church assumed more of
a devotional character, and less time was occupied in church discipline.
In fact the period of his pastorate seems a transition period in the history
of this church. Up to this time the discipline of the church was strict
and severe even to a fault, and probably took the lead in this respect
of all the churches in this region. For 30 years there were one or more
cases of discipline before the church during almost the entire time. The
meetings of the church, instead of being devoted to social worship and
religious exercises, were devoted to the examining of witnesses and listening
to church trials. Since 1840 there has been a very great change on this
point, the members seemingly have become tired of church trials and church
exclusions, and for a few year past discipline has been greatly if not
criminally neglected.
In the spring
of 1843 L. A. DUNN, the present pastor of the church, but then a licentiate,
commenced his labors with this people. On the 4th of October he was ordained.
The history of the church since 1843 the writer will not attempt
to give, he must leave this work to be performed by those who shall come
after him- He will only give a brief summary of statistics. During his
pastorate 376 have been added to the church- 67 by letter and 309 by baptism;
75 have been dismissed, 11 have been excluded; present number 326.
This church at an early day was most thoroughly indoctrinated in
the great fundamental doctrines of the Bible as taught by our denomination.
It has ever been thoroughly Calvinistic, though not Antinomian; and there
have never been but a very few cases of apostasy. On all the doctrines
and ordinances of our denomination, there has ever been a great unanimity
of feeling except on the single point of baptism when administered by pedo-Baptist
ministers. Millerism, Universalism, Perfectionism, Spiritualism, and the
legion of other "isms" that have made such terrible work with so many Baptist
churches in this region, have had but little or no effect upon this church..
This church for more than half a century has seemed rooted and grounded
in its faith. At times some have complained of its Antinomian tendencies,
and others have complained of its Armenian proclivities, but without being
moved by the one or disturbed by the other, it has held on the even tenor
of its way. This church has had 18 pastors, whose names have already been
mentioned. In addition to those names, Rev. Joseph CALL, Rev. Isaac SAWYER,
Rev. Roswell MEARS, and others of sacred memory, have often preached with
this people and rendered valuable service. This church has licensed some
18 young men to preach the gospel, and has ordained two -- its first and
present pastor.
In 1824 this church, in connection with the Congregational church,
erected a meeting-house -- a plain wooden structure 40 by 50 ft., which
was the first meeting-house erected in town. In 1848 the Baptist church
built a neat, substantial brick house of the same size. It was dedicated
Sept. 18, 1848, the pastor preaching the sermon, and Rev. Alva SABIN and
others taking part in the exercise. In 1851 the house was enlarged by dividing
the building a little back of the center, and then removing the rear part
of the house back 16 feet-thus giving room for 16 new pews. It was repainted
and frescoed, and Sept. 21, 1851 reopened for public worship. It was furnished
with a good bell and organ.
Such is a brief review of the history of this church. It had its
commencement among the log-cabins of the new settlement, and has grown
and increased with the population of the town. It has had its perils, and
hitherto the Lord hath helped us, and this church is now permitted to have
its place beside churches of other denominations in our town and county.
Fairfax,
April 1869.
MAJ.
GEN. ISRAEL BUSH RICHARDSON.
FROM
THE FAMILY.
Gen. RICHARDSON, son of Israel Putnam RICHARDSON, and Susan HOLMES
RICHARDSON, was born in Fairfax, Vt., Dec. 26, 1815; made a cadet, 1836
BREVET 2d Lieut. Third Infantry, July 1, 1841; First Lieut., Sept. 1846;
commanded his company and was distinguished in battle of Cerro Gordo; brevet
Captain for gallant conduct in battles of Contreras and Cherubusco, August
1847; brevet Major for gallant conduct in battle of Chapultepec; Captain,
March 1851; brevet Major Third Infantry; resigned September 30, 1855; Colonel
Second Michigan Volunteers, April 25, 1861; Brig.-Gen., May 17, 1861; Maj.-General,
July, 1862; died at Sharpsburgh, Nov. 3rd, 1862, of wounds received in
the battle of Antietam, Sept. 17, while commanding a division in the corps
of Gen. SUMNER. He was wounded while directing the fire of one of his batteries.
He was dismounted and in an exposed position when he was hit in the shoulder
by a piece of shrapnel. The painful wound deprived him of the pleasure
of commanding his men during the remainder of the action.
He was one of the first men in Michigan to volunteer for three years,
and was made a Col. of the Second Regiment, which became the first three
years regiment. Gen. RICHARDSON commanded a brigade at the first battle
of Bull Run and was soon after made a Brig. Gen. It was his brigade that
covered the Federal retreat and held the pursuing enemy at bay at Centreville.
He was the hero of the first day's fight at Blackburn's Ford. Shortly after
this and during all the Peninsula campaign he was in command of a Division.
He was in all the principal battles in the Peninsula, Williamsburgh, Gaines'
Mills, Malvern Mills and others, and always served with distinguished skill
and bravery.
So conspicuous and undoubted was his bravery that his soldiers familiarly
dubbed him as "Fighting Dick" -- a soubriquet with which the nation has
delighted to honor him." -- Detroit Advertiser & Tribune, Nov.
5, 1862.
Gen. RICHARDSON was buried with proper military ceremony at Pontiac,
Michigan, Nov. 11, 1862, under the supervision of Brig. Gen, TERRY. The
funeral services of the Episcopal church were read by the Rev. Dr. O'BRIEN,
of Pontiac, and the sermon was pronounced by the Rev. A. ELDRIDGE, D. D.,
of Detroit, of the Presbyterian church, of which Gen. R. was a constant
attendant. He had been twice married. He was first married to Dona Senorita
STEVENSON, of El Paso, Texas, Aug. 3, 1850, who died at El Passe, New Mexico,
Aug. 8, 1851. He was again married, May 29, 1861, in Detroit, Mich., to
Miss Frances A. TRAVER, only daughter of the late Simon A. TRAVER, Esq.,
of Kalamazoo, Mich., who, with a young child, survives him.
FROM
THE CHICAGO TIMES.
Col. I. B. RICHARDSON, of the Second Michigan Infantry, who has
distinguished himself by the plain, short and business-like report of his
operations, quite as much as by his bravery in the field, is a man of massive
frame, with the true iron-like expression of the men of the Green Mountains,
of usually quiet manners and unpretentious address. He was educated at
west Point, and served nearly 20 years in the army of the United States,
which he left a short time since with the rank of Major. His experience
as a fighter has been very great. During the Mexican war he distinguished
himself in nearly every important battle, and perhaps received more brevets
than any other officer of his rank, He was known in the army by the soubriquet
of "Fighting Dick," and it was said of him by an officer-himself greatly
distinguished for bravery-under whom he served, that "Richardson never
appeared well out of battle, but that in one he was magnificent."
In every-day life Col. RICHARDSON is the slowest and most deliberate
of mortals. Ht has none of the martinet in his discipline. Perhaps he should
be styled careless in this regard. Neither does he display the particularity
as to dress which usually characterizes regular officers. But be can live
as his men do and, if there is any fight in them, he will be sure to bring
it out. He probably never knew what fear was in his life, and goes under
fire with as much nonchalance as ordinary people go to breakfast. None
of the commanders sent to Washington by the States were greeted with a
heartier welcome by the Commander-in-chief than he was. "I'm glad," said
the old General upon meeting him, "to have my fighting Dick with me again,
and have plenty of work for him to do;" and in a few days afterwards he
placed him at the head of the brigade with which he covered the retreat
of the army at Bull Run -- a fact which is now proved by the official account,
but which the New York papers, most unaccountably, have kept from the public,
probably because be was not appointed from New York city. Yet every description
which has been given of the engagement reveals that he was in the right
place at the right time, and that whatever he had to do was well done.
This, too, without any special design to give him prominence, but because
the battle without RICHARDSON would be a funeral without the corpse. He
will undoubtedly be one of the principal figures of the war.
Colonel RICHARDSON is about 6 feet in height, broad-cheated, compact
and powerful in form. He is bronzed by the constant exposure of many years
of military life, has a loud sonorous voice, which it would take many cannon
to drown, and a piercing fiery eye, which few men can meet in anger. His
intonation and pronunciation are that of a New Englander. No one who hears
him speak can doubt where he comes from. He is no holiday soldier, and
has no doubt that war is earnest business, in which man must shoot and
be shot, and not a mere opportunity to wear fine clothes, and disport in
the bravery of evening parades.
From
the New York Times,
THE
LATE GEN. RICHARDSON.
A brief message comes by telegraph, announcing that Maj.-Gen. Israel
B. RICHARDSON died at Sharpsburgh on Monday night, of wounds received in
the battle of Antietam. So great a loss was seldom told in so few words.
The nation is called to mourn one of its staunchest supporters, the army
one of its moat gallant leaders. His comrades in battle -- -and in few
battles has our flag been borne where "Fighting Dick" did not lead the
van - will learn their loss with heavy hearts, and for his death alone
the future historian will write the victory of Antietam dearly bought.
Gen. RICHARDSON entered West Point early in life, and graduated
with honor. In the Mexican war, where the making of splendid names was
less sudden than in the present contest, there were three names that were
seldom absent from the Commander-in-chiefs dispatches -- RICHARDSON, RINGGOLD
and ROBERTS. At Cerro Gordo, a First Lieutenant commanding his company,
the young hero's brow was sprinkled with fire, and lie received the baptism
of "Fighting Dick," for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battles
of Contreras and Cherubusco, he was breveted Captain, and at Chapultepec
-- one of the little storming party that swept like a steel-crested wave
over the heights -- he won his majority. Cerro Gordo, Contreras, Cherubusco
and Chapultepec -- a prouder record no man need ask. Promotion in those
days, when it was thought a soldier did only his duty when he stood like
a wall and fought like a lion at bay, was slow and must needs be well merited,
but seldom were a Major's spurs speedier won or better earned.
When his country had no further use for him, seemingly, Major RICHARDSON
left the army for a farm in Michigan. But he did not beat his sword into
a plow-share -- it hung ever bright and ready to his hand against the time
when his country should need it. He forestalled the President's call for
men, and had a regiment well-nigh organized in his State by the time the
Proclamation came rolling over the prairies. With "Fighting Dick" to lead
them, men enough were found to follow. But he was not suffered to remain
a Colonel long. He needed no introduction to his old commander at Washington,
and a few days found him in command of a brigade with a General's star
on his shoulder. On the disastrous day which hurled back our army in broken
fragments upon Washington, he was conspicuous for his coolness and bravery,
and if individual heroism could have turned the tide of battle, it would
not have gone against us. When news of the rout and shameful retreat were
brought to Gen. SCOTT's ears, almost his first question was, "Where was
my Fighting Dick?" The record of the day told. When the Army of the Potomac
made its memorable advance upon Manassas, in March last, the writer of
this stood with Gen. RICHARDSON around the deserted fortifications at Centreville.
"These are formidable works and a strong position, General," we remarked.
"Yes, but a much smaller army of us took Chapultepec," he replied.
When the route to Richmond was changed, and the Peninsula was made
the point d'appui, Gen. RICHARDSON was made a division commander, and subsequently
promoted to a Major-Generalship for his behavior at Harrison's Landing.
His connection with the battle of Fair Oaks will not soon be forgotten.
In the retreat from the Peninsula, Gen. RICHARDSON achieved distinction
for the prudent and skillful handling of his division not inferior to that
he had previously won for valor in the field. In the battle of Antietam
he received the wounds that caused his death. He was leading a regiment
that had shown signs of wavering under a fierce artillery fire, when a
shell, bursting, struck him in the left breast, and his aids bore him from
the field. "Tell Gen. McClellan," said he, "that I have been doing a Colonel's
-work all day, and am now too badly hurt to do a General's." He was never
called on to do duty again. To the only command that could call him from
his country's be yielded.
In person, Gen. RICHARDSON was tall and commanding; 6 feet in height,
broad-chested, powerful in sinew, with an eye like an eagle's and a voice
that rang out above the shrilling of trumpets. He was scarcely the man
that even a chivalrous Southerner would select for a personal antagonist
on the field. His New England. birth betrayed itself in his accents, but
none ever joked him for being a Yankee In manners and dress he was eminently
unpretending, and seen sitting in the door of his tent in slouched hat
and only semi-uniform, would he selected by the curious observer rather
as the type of a farmer than the ideal of a General. But seen on the field
of battle, his character and rank could not easily be mistaken.
In our brief sketch we have been able to give but a very imperfect
idea of the man or of his life. But the biography of a man with whom deeds
took the place of words, who acted while others talked, who was in the
field before the President called him out, and left it only when the summons
of death came, who never had a private quarrel in his life, but was never
out of one of his country's battles when it was possible to be in it-the
biography of such a man is not to be written in newspaper limits. As soldier
and as citizen Gen. RICHARDSON served his country all his life. He never
drew his sword without crowning her with honor, and only caused her grief
when he died.
The following obituary notice of the late Gen. I. B. RICHARDSON,
was written by his intimate personal friend, Dr. J. H. TAYLOR (brother
of Bayard TAYLOR), Surgeon in Gen. R.'s division:
For
the Philadelphia Press.
Among the many eulogies to the memory of the late Maj. Gen. RICHARDSON,
few, if any, have paid tribute to his sterling qualities as a man. The
world acknowledges the hero and history will do honor to his fame; but
only those who knew him as a man, and had learned to love him, can appreciate
his noble character.
He possessed the kindest heart and the most unselfish nature; ever
careful and considerate where others were concerned, yet as guileless as
a child. His intellect was clear, vigorous and comprehensive, and his perceptions
so intuitive as almost to appear prophetic.
Possessing a singleness of purpose in the conscientious discharge
of every duty, he despised sophistry and duplicity in all their forms,
and went straight to his work with a firm and honest heart. He was earnest
in all he undertook, and integrity was so strongly marked in every act,
that faith in the man was irresistible. Impartial and just in his conclusions,
lenient in his judgments, firm in the right, and unswerving in his duty,
he impressed his manhood upon you. The most humble could approach him,
sure of an attentive hearing and a sincere interest in their wants; and
the affectionate respect with which he was regarded by every soldier in
his division is an evidence of his considerate care for their welfare.
They all felt and appreciates the true nobility and grandeur of
his character. Despising all vain pretensions, pomp and show, he recognized
greatness only by its worth. With manly independence of thought and action,
he was urbane and deferential to honest difference of opinion, but fearless
in the expression of his own.
The innate kindness of his heart made him tolerant and charitable.
He looked at the world through his own unselfish nature, trust-ed to that
integrity in others, which was but a counterpart of himself.
Life to him was earnest, and he felt as though it must be so to
all; thus his trust and confidence in human nature. The qualities that
made up the man adorned the soldier, they were one and inseparable; in
that his greatness consisted. He carried his manhood ever with him, and
lived out the honest promptings of his heart. No one could be in daily
intercourse with him and not feel his worth. Frank, cordial and genial,
and unpretending, where he trusted, he confided.
A close observer of men and events, a concise reasoned, possessed
of a wonderful memory, and an analytical mind, his conclusions were carefully
and accurately drawn, In council, as in the field, he was ever the same
fearless, independent man, conscious of the right, and steadfast in its
maintenance. His character was marked by strong contrasts, but the same
generous impulses prompted every act, whether by the family hearth or on
the tented field. It is in accordance with perfect manhood that it should
be so.
Forgetfulness of self pervaded his life. At home, the dutiful son,
the devoted husband, the affectionate brother, and kind friend; thoughtful
and ever mindful of those he loved, guarding them with jealous care and
tender solicitude.
But as he was kind and gentle in retirement, so was he stern and
invincible in war; and, as he had lived for others, so did he die.
J. H. T.
"The Vermont
Historical Gazetteer:
A Magazine
Embracing A History of Each Town,
Civil,
Ecclesiastical, Biographical and Military."
Volume
II, Franklin, Grand Isle, Lamoille & Orange Counties.
Including
Also The Natural History of Chittenden County.
Edited
and Published by Miss Abby, Maria Hemenway.
Burlington,
VT. 1871.
Page 165 -
190.
Transcribed
by Karima Allison 2004

|